User talk:Fayenatic london/Archive04

Please click the "new section" tab above to add a new message below.

If you are a registered user and I left a message on your talk page, I probably added it to my watchlist, so you can reply there if you prefer and I should still read it soon. However, I no longer check Wikipedia every day, so please also leave me a note or a {{talkback}} here. - Fayenatic (talk) 09:40, 9 August 2009 Fayenatic (talk) 14:01, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

2009

Happy new year!  Kalajan  01:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Singing in the Spirit

Well done. Sorry: I cannot help on references; I know it only from experience, but I am sure there must be some literature on it. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:22, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Don Potter (musician)

I think it looks much better now. Nice job! Eric444 (talk) 13:39, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Regarding removal of portions which violates BLP

The sources only say that Rajmohan Pillai was convicted by a Special CBI Court. According to the law in India, he was eligible to appeal to a higher level of judiciary and Mr. Pillai had done it already. This information was not available in the wesites shown as references 3 including former bank official get jail but was present on the regional newspapers Malayala Manorama and Mathrubhoomi dated 12 December 2008. So at this point of time, we cannot conclude him as convicted. Doing so will be a violation of Biographies of living persons and also will be a personal harassment to Mr. Pillai. --Z16bsr2 (talk) 15:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

This has been answered at BLP Noticeboard.

If you have access to additional WP:Reliable sources, it would be relevant to state whether Mr Pillai is currently detained or at liberty pending his appeal. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:27, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

The Christmas massacres

When redirecting or merging articles, it is nice if you make sure that the infomation is merged aswell. Chesdovi (talk) 21:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. I did check the most notable elements of the content, and they had been merged. I noticed some that was not merged, but considered it to be less notable. If I had not redirected it then it was due for deletion yesterday; whereas now any editor can check the edit history and retrieve any information they think should be added to the new article. Keeping the old page as a redirect also retains the history of which editors started the coverage of the subject in Wikipedia, which I understand is good practice under the GFDL. I trust that on balance my action was positive. - Fayenatic (talk) 08:46, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Names Pages

Hello Fayenatic! Thanks for your invitation to join WikiProject Anthroponymy - I was there and left a message on the discussion page. I would be glad to join. Thanks again!

TedSwarovski (talk) 17:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

W L A

FYI [1] Gordo (talk) 20:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Windows Media Loss Less

Hi Fayenatic. You think a redirect is a better on the Windows Media Player LossLess page? I was thinking a delete proposal such that the information could be reviewed, merged into the page I proposed, and then maybe that page could be deleted. The one incoming link could also be updated. I feel like simply making a redirect instantly purges the information on that page without any review. Any thoughts? Shields020 (talk) 19:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't feel strongly about it, but: (i) redirects are cheap, (ii) if a link title is created once, even if you change that one then it might be deleted again, and (iii) I thought it was a useful set of words to have as a direct result if used in the search box. On the other hand, the CamelCase "LossLess" is a bit odd. I'll revert, and create a redirect without camelcase. - Fayenatic (talk) 21:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Year of birth missing instead of Date of birth missing

Hi. Concerning this edit I would like to inform you that for for article pages we use Category:Year of birth missing (living people) instead of Category:Date of birth missing (living people). Please read instructions in both categories and WP:BLP for more information. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 16:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks -- I will remember that in future. I also did not know that Category:Living people was not a head category of that one. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

help me edit my page?

Hi,

my brother Fred R. Shapiro, editor of the Yale Book of Quotations, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_R._Shapiro suggested that i contact you and ask for your help.

Another reason is that i see that you are a Star Trek "fayenatic"...

Last week, i created a page about myself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_N._Shapiro

It has been neither deleted nor approved... they seem to want me to make further changes... but i do not know what to do... could you please edit it for me, i trust your judgment, you will know what formatting changes they are looking for...

Thanks, Alan —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlanNShapiro (talk • contribs) 16:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

List of Fictional Quatets and Larger groups

• This will be a list of grou;s of 4 or moreRegemet (talk) 18:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Michael Perry (hymnwriter)

On January 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Michael Perry (hymnwriter), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 13:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Working Man's Barnstar

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		I, electricRush, hereby award you this Working Man's Barnstar for your hard work. -electricRush | Sign! 23:18, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Coventry Cross

I think there is huge history to Coventy Cross. Now that I have your attention, are you coming on my walk on Wednesday 4th February 2009? Gordo (talk) 09:27, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Can do. When and where? - Fayenatic (talk)

Sian (Goddess)

I don't know how this "article", Sian (Goddess), survived so long, but I can assure you that it is utter nonsense - there is no such figure - and can be safely deleted as a hoax. Regards, Enaidmawr (talk) 00:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Tanakh stubs

Hi there - I don't know how to re-submit something to the server...let me post something to WPSS and see if anyone has any ideas. Thanks for the haeads up - Pegship (talk) 18:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

You're probably right, but I don't know anything about how bots work or how to request one. I'll check...or if you know someone feel free to instigate it. Cheers, Pegship (talk) 23:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Westminster School

In your last edit to Westminster School, you moved part of the references higher up the article. I have replaced it back at the bottom as it disrupted the look and feel of the article, but you have a particular reason for its placing, I have no problem with its replacement. Thanks Tmwerty (talk) 21:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Oops, bother and sorry! I inserted the Reflist tag so that I could preview the expanded references and check that they displayed properly. I meant to delete it before I saved the page, of course. Thanks for fixing it.

What about this edit? It should either be cited or reverted. - Fayenatic (talk) 21:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I missed that - a search on the internet brings up £24000 and a reference here BBC News, but others bring up numbers such as £31000, and the schools boarding fee is what is mentioned here, which only under a third of the pupils in the school pays, so perhaps it should be removed. What do you think? Tmwerty (talk) 21:45, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

I think the fee level is suitable information to include in the article. For example, Eton College has a section on "Charitable status and fees" and states their annual fee. However, this does not belong in the lead section. Some comparison to other schools' fees may be relevant to the article, but probably not the comparison to average salary. - Fayenatic (talk) 21:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

revision 268602372

To answer your question, the "parts" referred to from Trek episdode "Return to Tomorrow" were not props. The script for "Spock's Brain" i.d.'ed the controls McCoy used as scavenged from the incomplete androids. Furthermore, the reference book Star Trek Compendium explains about the unnamed actor, including an edited blooper reel after his scene with Diana Muldaur and Leonard Nimoy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Energicko (talk • contribs) 22:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Please go ahead and re-write it more clearly, stating your sources and why it is notable. I started to do so but then realised that I still don't understand the specifics.

While you're doing it, I suggest changing the heading from "Notes" to "Continuity with later episodes"; that seems to me to add significance. Best wishes, Fayenatic (talk) 23:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Removing 'philanthropist' in Faye Wong article

Thank you! It was getting so ludicrous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noveltykid (talk • contribs) 18:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Moin Fayenatic london,

Thanks a lot for your help. I'm not so gut in foreign languages, that's why i'm very thankfull.

I'm looking for people that help me to translate in French, Spanish and so on.

Best Regards, --Raboe001 (talk) 17:20, 7 February 2009

Turner Falls

Thanks, but with an article that small, 3 pictures is too many. 1 is plenty. I've left the 3 up now, could you pick one and link to the others? Thanks. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 00:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

The pictures are complementary, and I see no harm in keeping them all. Does a Gallery layout look better? Somehow it makes the text look even shorter. - Fayenatic (talk) 08:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

3 pictures would be fine, if there was enough text so the pictures would not dominate. Galleries are discouraged. Again, this is a matter of taste. Perhaps beefing up the article text is the best solution, provided it can be done without puffery. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 14:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

OK, I selected the picture which gives the falls some context/scale, and also illustrates the park since that is covered in the text. I couldn't find much in reliable sources to expand the article, but added a little from the town and state's official websites. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

I like your changes. The infobox is good too. I found an announcement about a survey that may require this article to be updated when the survey is complete. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 18:28, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. When you do, please update Natural Falls State Park as well, since it also claims the tallest falls in the state at 77'. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Jewish Christians

Thanks for the note. Im dealing with a few issues related to it. -Stevertigo 18:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Bubble tea!

-download | sign! has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!

Spread the bubbliness of bubble teas by adding {{subst:bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Fay (name)

No, please do not merge Fay and Faye. If people do not know the correct spelling they will access the other spelling under "See also". Kraxler (talk) 00:28, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia article about Igor Panarin

Thanks for your editing - it's always much better if a native speaker revises the text! :) Лъчезар (talk) 14:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

My pleasure! - Fayenatic (talk) 14:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

I had forgotten one small matter. You changed the original Panarin's text on Gorbachev "but when it came to work, it was a different matter" to "but he could not do anything to make his vision work". The original text may be a quick Russian to English translation but even imperfect, it more exactly reflects what Panarin means. Do you mind if I (of you if you want) change this text back to what it was? Of course, if you can come with a better sounding version that doesn't change the meaning, that would be even better... Лъчезар (talk) 09:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

If that better reflects the original, then you were right to revert that part of my edit. The trouble is that it is not at all clear (in English, at least) what that means. Did Panarin mean that Gorbachev talked a lot but did no work? If it's not clear, then it can't be notable, so I'd rather delete the sentence completely. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it better reflects the original, and I understand that the English translation of his words is rather bad. He meant that Gorbachev did the opposite of what he talked. If you read his article Gorbachev - the Antihero of Russia (you can use translate.google.co.uk to get a rough but readable machine translation), you'll better understand Panarin's opinion on Gorbachev. So if you can reword the bad English sentence while keeping the original meaning, great. Лъчезар (talk) 19:20, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

This is not easy... Panarin writes near the end, "it is not clear whether this is the result of managerial incompetence or deliberate malicious intent." We should add that article as a ref. How about "but he failed to manage the changes, and only presided over the Union's economic disaster and national collapse". - Fayenatic (talk) 19:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I agree with both adding that article as a reference and changing the text according to your proposal. Can you please do it? (The idea was yours :) Лъчезар (talk) 05:26, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Which sequence of tenses do you use as a native English speaker? Now that I read about this (I didn't even know how this thing is called in English!) it turns out that I've used the "natural" sequence of tenses in my text, especially the "Interviews" subsection. Is this OK, or would the "classic" (as I've been taught to it!) "attracted" sequence of tenses be better? Needless to say I prefer the current "natural" one but if you firmly think that the "attracted" one is better, I could rewrite the text... Лъчезар (talk) 17:33, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Year of birth unknown

Well done for the great job in moving the category in the correct place. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

OK, thanks for leaving a clear edit summary when fixing one that I had done wrong! It's not very exciting so I don't promise to do a lot more of these... Fayenatic (talk) 17:44, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Consequent link?

Hi, I'm puzzled by this edit summary: "consequent link have to be avoided, if possible". Please would you explain here? - Fayenatic (talk) 21:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

I meant "one after the other" :S Manual of Style reads: "If possible, avoid placing two links next to each other in the text so they look like a single link, as in [[film]] [[actress]] (film actress). Consider rephrasing the sentence, omitting one of the links, or using a single more specific link instead." -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KWordQuiz

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article KWordQuiz, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Promotional article, little content, flagged for sources and notability since Dec 2008

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fayenatic (talk) 13:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

If you think the article has to be deleted, I won't object. --Eiku (talk) 15:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

date, year, decade and century!

Hello, Fayenatic london. You have new messages at Robertgreer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

move categories (and pages) within Category:William Shakespeare plays to Category:Works by William Shakespeare

Hello, Fayenatic london. You have new messages at Robertgreer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Blackwall Peninsula

Hi Fayenatic. It's certainly true that many references to Blackwall Peninsula turn up, so I suppose from that viewpoint there ought to be a redirect. Are they valid references though? Loads of these actually mirror old copies of Wikipedia, so must be ignored. Of more credibility is an LDDC article ( http://www.lddc-history.org.uk/planning/index.html ) which is actually talking about an entirely different peninsula - in Blackwall - the one surrounded by the Lea. Many of the rest are clearly not by experts of any description. You have edited the article to say 'for much of the 20th Century it appeared on maps as Blackwall peninsula' with a reference from a newspaper entertainment section that actually says "..in pre-Dome maps, always called the Blackwall Peninsula (no mention of Greenwich)." It depends how far back you go - for example the OS 1:2,500 scale maps of 1867, 1894 and 1914 call it "Greenwich Marshes". It was certainly generally known as East Greenwich (that's the alternative name for Blackwall Point Power Station for example). Can you point me to any map which shows the name Blackwall peninsula? If so I'll shut up. Pterre (talk) 00:49, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi Pterre, thanks for the note. I believe the Independent story is sufficient for WP:V. The same writer, Paul Barker, included a similar statement in a New Statesman article in 1997. Then there's Hansard: Simon Hughes in 1993 [2] ("British Gas... Port Greenwich development proposals on its land at Blackwall peninsula") and John Austin-Walker in 1994 [3] ("Blackwall peninsula—derelict land that once housed the now-defunct metropolitan gas works"). Good enough? - Fayenatic (talk) 08:53, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

The Hansard quotes would be better, but even MPs make mistakes - it was of course the South Metropolitan Gas Works, also known as East Greenwich gas works. I've combed carefully through Mary Mills' "Greenwich Marsh - The 300 years before the Dome" looking for any reference to Blackwall peninsula. Names include Greenwich Level, Greenwich Marsh, Greenwich Peninsula, Blackwall Point or Lea Ness (the northern tip), Bendish Marsh, Bugsbys Hole, East Greenwich, New East Greenwich. Late in the century we get North Greenwich tube station (not to be confused with North Greenwich across the river). So far as I can see the Web references to the Greenwich peninsula as Blackwall peninsula date from circa 1993 or later, do not include any official maps, and may have originated with confusion with the actual Blackwall peninsula. Since the confusion seems to exist (or did for a while?) we probably need a link, though unless you can show me otherwise your quote about maps on the Greenwich Peninsula article is simply incorrect. But how do we disambiguate from the 'correct' use of the name which is here? Pterre (talk) 09:40, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Do you have any other citations for the peninsula in the Lea being called that? I haven't come across any other instances. It has been known as East Poplar and Orchard Place.[4] Recent planning applications in Tower Hamlets have used Orchard Place and "Leamouth Peninsula" for both parts of the "whale's tail",[5] but "blackwall peninsula" is not found on that Council's website.

Even the LDDC made mistakes. (Oh yes.) Maybe they invented the name for that article. The only other case I can find where the LDDC used "Blackwall Peninsula" clearly refers to the Greenwich one: see Improving connections to Docklands and Figure 16. - Fayenatic (talk) 12:10, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Also, Paul Barker seems a reliable source to me. He is a senior research fellow of the Young Foundation, formerly the Institute of Community Studies.[6][7][8] - Fayenatic (talk) 12:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Reliable is as reliable does. His statement in the article that you quoted is Its very existence would, it was hoped, cancel out the blight over what was, in pre-Dome maps, always called the Blackwall Peninsula (no mention of Greenwich). That is plainly wrong - the peninsula has a long and very well documented history as Greenwich Marsh, East Greenwich and the Greenwich Peninsula. It is true that the odd report has a sketch map with the name Blackwall peninsula, but these all appear to be post 1990, and possibly repeating a misunderstanding. I don't believe they support his contention. I think it would be better to alter the quote to one of the Hansard ones and comment that it 'is today (confusingly) sometimes referred to as the Blackwall peninsula' or words to that effect. Pterre (talk) 18:39, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for butting in - North Greenwich has always been a mutable term - being also applied to the southern end of the Isle of Dogs - a la North Woolwich. The principle determining factor is likely to be Blackwall Reach - which lies at the end of the peninsula. I have never come across 'Blackwall peninsula' as a descriptor, a quick look at Brit History online gives no such derivation; and I'd expect some reference to it there. HTH Kbthompson (talk) 00:16, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi Kb, butt away. Your sentiments support mine, though it does seem to be true that the term Blackwall peninsula came into use in parts of the development community in the 1990s. Not sure if the unfortunate term has gone away yet. Pterre (talk) 09:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Probst

Sure looks like they're all the same person. One problem is the two different spellings in the Holweck, but I can try to check on them and maybe check the lists of books printed then to see if there aren't two separate books by similarly named people. I do think they are the same, though. John Carter (talk) 16:36, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Hit Singles clean up on Greg London page

Happy New Year to you to Fayenatic. Thank you so much for reworking the page. I am practicing and using other pages that look good to me and still learning more about what is accurate so I appreciate the attention. We have Editorial coming from the Music Journalist community that should be published soon concerning Greg London having been declared the highest charting new and indie single on Media Base and R & R, hopefully this week. DJ Laurent Wolf does not have a US Wiki page yet. I will see about getting one up in order to substantiate that new relationship better, however, the song is coming to You Tube soon as well and could be referenced in the video channel at that time. Within one week the collaboration should be news, I am told. Publicity for Greg London is LUCK Media and they are highly reputable, no faking or hyping. The FMQB Chart and USA Today Media Base Chart is posted on the Greg London Official website at the moment on the home page.

I look forward to additional corrections or aid.

Kindly, Monika LondonMonika London (talk) 21:48, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you so much, Kindly71.93.74.74 (talk) 18:48, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: message on my talk

Hello, Fayenatic london. You have new messages at Tide rolls's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mackenzie Calhoun

I think we are slightly askew when it comes to the role canon plays in Wikipedia's coverage of Star Trek characters. However, I think we can agree that very few non-canon characters are notable enough to warrant articles here -- and having a category for the two or three that are seems like unneessarily granular categorization. I switched Calhoun to the broader Starfleet officers cat. since, well, he is, and because the article makes clear he originates in the books and not a Paramount-produced production. Right now, he's the only entry in the non-canon characters cat -- would you object to having that category emptied out so it can be CSDed for its tiny population and implausibility of any expansion? --EEMIV (talk) 23:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

No problem. I was going to self-revert first thing this morning anyway. - Fayenatic (talk) 07:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Hornsey Housing Trust

Hi, thanks for your correction - but I assume that it is not a place within either Category:London Borough of Haringey, or Category:London Borough of Barnet - as it says on the tin "This category is for places within the London Borough of ...; other items should be placed within one of the more specific linking sub-categories". It seemed that "Buildings and structures in ..." might be less non-acceptable - since I assume the organisation has "buildings and structures" within those boroughs than adding them into a general grab bag. Perhaps there's an argument for a more specific "Organisations in ..." category.

Sorry if that comes out 'snitty' - it's not my intention - just been a long night; I'm sure we can find the right place for this 'thing'. Cheers Kbthompson (talk) 23:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I started a reply at length, but lost it. In short, the text on the category page is misleading, as the category is also -- properly -- the home for sub-cats which are not about places, e.g. People, Politics. I suggest asking WikiProject London (a) whether to revise the text that is on some London Boroughs category pages, and (b) whether to add sub-cats for organisations based in or active in Boroughs. - Fayenatic (talk) 07:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

See - Category:London organisations; and Category:Charities based in London. HTH Kbthompson (talk) 08:14, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

danish deletion

Thanks for catching that! I thought I had checked for incoming links, but obviously I didn't. Brianyoumans (talk) 01:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello Fayenatic you have a message at user talk page

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Monika_London&diff=next&oldid=287730121Monika London (talk) 16:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

If you meant to leave me a message, I think you forgot to save it! - Fayenatic (talk) 20:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia is tantimount to rocket science. Monika London (talk) 13:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Yesterday Saga

how about just redirecting it? Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

What for? There are no incoming links, and I don't think just 2 books would justify categorising a redirect within Category:Science fiction book series. - Fayenatic (talk) 17:20, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Because people might search for it. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

OK, keep the words in one of the articles, then it would show up in a search. - Fayenatic (talk) 12:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

But why should it not go there automatically? That's the whole point of redirects. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

OK, done. - Fayenatic (talk) 10:16, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

File:StKitts Xmas 1983 MS.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:StKitts Xmas 1983 MS.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:09, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Corrie Theme Greg London

Mail on Sunday this coming Sunday's issue. Fox 5 Las Vegas Tuesday, June 16th, Nevada Magazine reader's poll results.

86.217.130.67 (talk) 23:21, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Ballet redirects

Hello, Fayenatic london. You have new messages at Robertgreer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Deletion review for Surnames by Country

The discussion for Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 June 6#Category:Surnames by country in which you participated was closed as delete and is now under review at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 June 25#Category:Surnames by country. Your participation and input is invited. Alansohn (talk) 05:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Elisha

Dear Faye... I'm new to this briefly: i need to re-edit thing on Elisha because the article crosses both Ikings and 2kings, inaccuracy can lead to untruths, those for me go against the grain, I like the grain to go upward. Rubics Icosahedron —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubics icosahedron (talk • contribs) 17:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

OK, what help do you need from me? The article Elisha does need more work; it appears to be 2 accounts of his life pasted one after the other, as the miracles and other events are summarised and then repeated in different words. It's fine that the one article covers both 1 and 2 Kings, but feel free to rearrange it into a single account. However, please work from what Wikipedia policy calls reliable sources, not directly from the Bible. We are not allowed to add our own opinions or interpretations; if you do that, somebody will probably revert your work, which can feel hurtful and frustrating until you get the hang of the main policies around here. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

A ping from Coralmizu

Hello there, Fayenatic. Check your sandbox if you haven't already; I've fulfilled your request on my talk page. Thanks, —Coralmizu (Mizu onna sango15)^{Drop a line} 03:19, 16 July 2009 (UTC).

Copyeditor's barnstar

		CopyEditor's BarnStar
		I award you this CopyEditor's BarnStar for insisting on clear, comprehensible, and grammatically correct articles. For you great work fixing all my language mistakes in the Igor Panarin and Prediction of the United States collapse in 2010 articles, and thus teaching better English to me!--Лъчезар (talk) 17:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Request to protect List of Mudaliars and Mudaliar articles

In the List of Mudaliars and Mudaliar articles, some unknown IP is adding many non-notable names. I had reverted the vandalism by such IP many times. Inspite of it adding of non-notable and non-Mudaliar persons continues. Through the revision history of Pillai article, I came to know that you are always stressing the importance of citations and protecting that article. Similarly i req. you to protect these articles from vandalism --Sureshmaran (talk) 23:31, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

The Bug Squashers' Award for Excellence

		The Bug Squashers' Award for Excellence
		For your recent timely report of an error made by xenobot during task 6.1, I award you the Bug Squashers' Award for Excellence in bug squashing efforts. Thank you for catching this error so quickly! –xenotalk 14:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Allison (surname)

Thanks. It's easy, but then, there are the "what links here" to think about and I had already done that once the same day.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:30, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure I understand your point, but you're welcome anyway! - Fayenatic (talk) 21:59, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Nathan

Actually he is, lots of fans will generally refer to him as just Nathan. If you meant formally, yes, he isnt. I may be missing something, but aren't disam pages for listing everything? I added his name because any casual fan (not necessarily knowing how wiki naming formats are) may just enter 'nathan' in the search bar. Isnt that the idea? Suede67 (talk) 14:14, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Oh, good. I did not have the other page on my watchlist, so I could know. I understand what you said, and the link was helpful, thanks. Suede67 (talk) 17:52, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Teluk Intan, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Bob K | Talk 11:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your note; I did know about MOS. I also knew the article still wasn't perfect after my edits, but at least it was an improvement. I think you left it worse than I did, so I am reverting your Undo. - Fayenatic (talk) 12:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Your message on my talk page

Hi F ... I'm not sure what you're asking me to do with your message on my talk page. If you're looking for admin intervention, I'm not your man since I'm not an admin. Perhaps you meant to leave your request with someone else? --sanfranman59 (talk) 22:32, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Deletions

I deleted the reception paragraph of 18 (album) because it was too short and insignificant. For example, having a reception paragraph for Play (album) would make more sense, because the album was very popular and sold many copies worldwide. I hope it makes sense to you now. --James599 (talk) 11:24, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

List of overweight actors in United States cinema

You edited this article. This is a friendly notice that your input would be welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of overweight actors in United States cinema. This information is provided without any request that you support or oppose the deletion of the article. Thanks. Edison (talk) 04:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Dussehra

I don't remember the redirect, Dasara in South India (see Mysore Dasara) implies the ten-day festival of Navaratri as a whole and in the North, Dasara implies the tenth day of the festival - Vijayadashami, Dasara as it is now corresponds to Vijayadashami day. What you think we should do? --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

On further inspection I think Dasara should become a disambiguation page between Navaratri, Vijayadashami, and Mysore Dasara - if you agree, I'll post this at talk:Dasara. - Fayenatic (talk) 16:52, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

See Wikipedia_talk:Hinduism-related_topics_notice_board#Dasara. Put your comments here. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:40, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Kamal Chunchie

Nice work on Kamal_Chunchie Gordo (talk) 22:07, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

It's nice not to be the only person who understands that Hilary Duff doesn't belong on the Hilary dab page. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Disney India Pvt. Ltd.

Thanks man.I ll surely look forward to edit Disney India. st ttb —Preceding unsigned comment added by St ttb (talk • contribs) 07:23, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: WikiCleaner malfunction

Honestly, I have no idea. I will say, though, that whatever it was, it was my fault but not WikiCleaners. Usually if it's a mistake, it's me mistyping. Not sure about that one. --User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 05:16, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Web squared

An article that you have been involved in editing, Web squared, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web squared. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:18, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hero Boy

The article Hero Boy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim to notability, director redlinked, no references. Only external link is to Imdb, which has less detail than this article. No ghits except this article, imdb and mirrors.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:01, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Sugar Blue

Wow - what a detective you are ! A very good spot, I may say.

It was 'my' article and I simply took the quote from Sugar Blue on face value. To be honest I am going on holiday for a couple of weeks later on today, so I did not take as much time investigating all aspects of the topic as I might have done. However, you appear to be quite right. I looked at Allmusic and a couple of other sites, and can find no reference to Sidney Bechet recording the song, "Sugar Blues", nor an album of his of that title. There is the track named "Sugar" [9] - which may have been billed on the record label as "Sugar" (Blues). Alternatively Sugar Blue himself has got a little mixed up; and the box of old 78s he saw contained Bechet records and another - perhaps by Clyde McCoy, Bob Wills or Fats Waller - of the song "Sugar Blue". Obviously either 'explanation' is pure speculation on my part. I do feel this is worth investigating further, but, as I say, I am going away so will not be able to delve deeper much before Christmas time.

We perhaps need a Bechet 'expert' (assuming you are not one) to fully confirm our suspicions. Or, and this is a longer shot, someone with contacts with Sugar Blue himself, to see if we can better verify his quote. I suspect that someone, somewhere along the way, may have already pointed out to Blue that Bechet did not record such a track.

If your interest goes no further than posing the questions on the article's talk page, then I understand. Otherwise, please bear with me. Regards,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:24, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Apologies

I'm sorry and apologize if I sounded harsh. I'm not quite sure, however, how -- if you followed WP:BEFORE -- you missed all the cites here. When one editor fails to do a google news search, at minimum, and then noms an article for an AfD, many other editors end up doing what that one editor alone should have done. That's why I viewed it as a waste of time, and failure to do a wp:before search, as is required. This is happening way, way too often at the music/band AfDs these days for some reason. But apologies if you thought my response too harsh. And thanks for agreeing to the close.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:01, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the message. As you can see from the previous entry here on my talk page, I sometimes get the detective work right! In this case plain Google search brings up mainly mirrors, record sales and blogs. Two other editors had agreed with the PROD and only Thaddeus opposed it, mentioning Washington Post, and searching there is empty. I did try Google news, so I'm not sure what went wrong -- I should have found some results from [10] and [11]; perhaps I failed to click the news archive button, as there is nothing in current news. Live and learn! - Fayenatic (talk) 12:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Again, I totally understand that your nom was good faith now. To give you some background, if you take a look at other nominations on the list right now, you will see that an uncomfortably high percentage look as though the noms--unlike you--didn't take the time to do any research, and had no concern about nominating the articles even after the sources were surfaced by others. That ends up wasting a whole bunch of editors' time, as you can imagine, that could better be spent improving articles. I think a good course for a nom in your situation is to withdraw the nomination (or suggest that it be closed as a snow keep) once the nom is satisfied that proper sources have surfaced. That at least cuts down on the time wasted by editors after that point. And I--and I imagine most editors--have respect for those few editors who do that. I routinely do it when editors surface sources that change my mind as to an AfD. Anyway, I appreciate your message, and am happy to work with you and look forward to it, and again -- I apologize if I was short. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:11, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: WikiCleaner malfunction

If you look above, I did answer your last inquiry. There isn't a "malfunction" of WikiCleaner. All of the edits are my own. WikiCleaner just gives an easier to deal with list than regular Wikipedia does. It's not a robot or even semi-automatic. In this case, I don't even remember what I did. I have a feeling it was just a copy and paste issue, which happens. All of the edits are basically copy and paste for WikiCleaner. --User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 02:07, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

It's quite alright :) --User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 00:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Please see

Talk:List of international professional associations... I dont believe the move was discussed or required. Please see my comments there. Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 00:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of female stock characters

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of female stock characters.

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of female stock characters (2nd nomination).

Ikip (talk) 17:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EyesOnMeSmall.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EyesOnMeSmall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:12, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Dude. Too busy to watch my watchlist these days! - Fayenatic (talk) 13:47, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EyesOnMeSmall.jpg. ... Skier Dude (talk) 05:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks again, it was a redundant duplicate image which I had reinstated to the article -- now it's this one. - Fayenatic (talk) 17:29, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EyesOnMeSmall.jpg. ... J Milburn (talk) 22:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you too for the warning. You suggested adding the image at the article on the single instead, but the article on the single was previously merged there. I don't mind recreating the article in the single, which was certainly notable, but other editors forcibly and repeatedly merged it into the article on FF8 music, and merging it does avoid unnecessary fancruft. - Fayenatic (talk) 00:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

I have no objection to the image appearing in the article on the single, but mindlessly asserting that the image is "iconic" is going to get you nowhere with regards to including it in the discography article. I have no opinion on whether an article on the single should exist. J Milburn (talk) 01:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

That word was not the sum total of my justifications recorded on the talk page and in edit sumaries.

You may have three times as many edits as me, but that doesn't exempt you from WP:CIVIL. Perhaps you thought that "mindless" was a suitable epithet to go with my user name. I chose it without a great deal of thought, intending humour, but sometimes regret the choice; you wouldn't be the first editor to take it the wrong way. - Fayenatic (talk) 14:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC)