User talk:Esn/Archive02

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VI - November 2006

The November 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

overfishing

thanks for the good contribution to this article and the new reference. This article has been too timid with respect to "telling it like it is", with too much editing form the fishing industry and the "politiaclly correct" timid crowd. i hope you will continue to add to this important article. best regards. Anlace 02:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

L'Enfant au grelot

Wasn't this one a short ? I was actually thinking of La Prophétie des grenouilles (Raining Cats and Dogs) as Girerd's first feature.Ji-Elle 11:01, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, I haven't seen it, but most French sources mention 26 or 28', for instance Unifrance, an official (and very useful) database (http://www.unifrance.org/films/detail_film.asp?CommonUser=&langue=21004&cfilm=20905).

Couldn't "52'" refer to the duration of the whole DVD (including other shorts) ?.

Yes, it's great to work on this project in parallel. I'm rather out of practice in English, but any language will do. Ji-Elle 16:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Your graph proposal on the eastern front is bad

Why do you compare all Soviet losses with the lowest number of Germans military losses in the field

Why compare the 31 (which is 28 million not 31!) million soviet dead with ONLY German dead in the field. And then use the absolut lowest number for Germans who died in the field

Why do you totally ignore the axis dead Over 1 million German allies also died this you ignore

Why do you list civilians and military togheter

And why even install that graph at all because there is are much better graphs several at the bottom of the page

To compare ALL Soviet citisens who died with the lowest estimate of German military losses is bad.

You split up German military who died useing the lowest number in the field and the highest number in POW but you do not split up the Soviet military who died in the field and who died in camps and then you add Soviet civilians and compare this number with German military dead (the lowest number) in the field. Beenhj 14:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Ok, but the numbers are all wrong look at the end of the text and you will see that your numbers are all wrong. Beenhj 00:27, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Look the the numbers at the bottom are correct and have many sources and I think this whole infobox thing is a big misstake but if you are going to use them then atleast have correct numbers for example the german numbers are pre 2004, because if you look at the bottom you can see a german guy who wrote a book in 2004 and those numbers are used, why? Because he went through all German records of 1956 and all of the soldiers that could not be found or accounted for he declared dead. Also the sources used here are ENGLISH you must use English sources in english wikipedia, look I will mail the dude who wrote half the page and you can talk with him, but now i will change the numbers so that they fit with the ENGLISH modern sources listed at the bottom of the page. Beenhj 00:47, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes there is no absolut law but English SHOULD be used look there are many sources at the bottom also I know that the official Soviet military dead was 8,646,400 or something like that but a Russian guy called "Vadim Erlikman" in his book Poteri narodonaseleniia v XX veke: spravochnik. Moscow 2004. ISBN 5931651071 estimated that looking at the number of males between 19-49 that died (17 million) the official number is low. Look I have mailed the dude who wrote half the page and made all the graphs, he is a bit crazy and insane but he knows the numbers left and right up and down and side to side just wait until he mails you back Beenhj 00:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

The user got blocked again, he gets blocked every 5 minutes but you can check out the World War II casualties all numbers have been listed there. There is a guy called User:Woogie10w who knows English, Russian and German he keeps an eye on that page just shoot him a message and he will answer you. He also has access to vast amount of numbers Beenhj 18:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Esn/Temp

...now contains the article you're looking for. To revoke a deletion decision, please see WP:DRV. (Radiant) 16:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

This part was deleted

"(Russian: Великая Отечественная Война, Velikaja Otečestvennaja Vojna), a name which alludes to the Russo–Napoleonic Patriotic War on Russian soil in 1812. The term Great Patriotic War appeared in the Soviet newspaper Pravda one day after Hitler invaded the Soviet Union, in a long article titled "The Great Patriotic War of the Soviet People" (Russian: Великая Отечественная война cоветского народа). The term "war against aggression" was used by the Soviet Union before the involvement of the United States and Japan."

Do you understand?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.249.102.38 (talk • contribs) 10:55, 13 November 2006

Yes, I realized only later that it was deleted because the information was moved to another article so as not to clutter up the main article about the Eastern Front. Esn 11:00, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

In reverting, you also reverted another edit that was made. Be more carefull next time. I'm reverting to 67.168.24.170's version because the text in question was not deleted from the article, just moved. Esn 11:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

To move is to delete, who will know that it has been moved? --> Not many. If you move around bits and pieces of an article then sooner or later nothing will be left. Moveing something is the same as deleting but just much fancier.

If that is your view, then I suggest you go to the article on World War II and move back all of the stuff that has been moved to other articles. Move all of the info on every single battle back into the main WWII article, ok? You would make a lot of people angry, though.

It is wikipedia policy for things to be moved into sub-articles.

You may not have noticed this, but the user who moved the text created a link on the words "Great Patriotic War" - if anyone is interested in that term, they will click on it. Esn 20:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

re: 71.249.95.231 (talk · contribs) plus others

I am not an admin so I cannot block him. There are a couple of other IP's(same user different computer?) who make the same POV changes to those articles as well. Make up a detailed report about the IP's constant attacks on Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton and Harold Lloyd and submit it to WP:ANI. Perhaps an Admin familiar with the situation will take note and look after things. WP:ANI is "hit n miss" so good luck. In the meantime I will watch those pages for similar "Pro-Lloyd/Anti-Charlie" edits. Cheers! Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 15:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Our Gang

I responded to your questions on the talk page. I think the image is definitely better than the low-res one previously used, but it is not public domain. The website is incorrect: that's Andy Samuel, not Jay R. Smith, and the picture was taken in either late 1923 or early 1924 (Ernie Morrison departed Our Gang sometime in spring 1924). I added a fair use rationale and the proper fair use tag, and swapped the images out. Thanks for finding that photo! --FuriousFreddy 05:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Request for your opinion

Affirmative. D•a•r•k•n•e•s•s•L•o•r•d•i•a•n•••CCD••• 21:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Same Kc4 18:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Archiving

I notice that you have a lot of discussion. Perhaps you would be interested in archiving. Werdnabot can make it easier. Kc4 21:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Kc4, but I prefer to do it myself for now - if this user page becomes a lot more active, though, I may change my mind. Esn 00:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Newsletter

The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

ratatooooooy

yeah, I see what you're saying. SpikeJones 15:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006

The December 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:33, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

ise

Thanks, i had a Firefox plugin that auto-spell checks... so much for innovation. The rest of the article does not seem to go towards the British or American spellings. You are the first major contributor... revert it? Well done on the List of stop-motion films--Cans 00:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Newsletter

The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:29, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Notice

This is to inform you that Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Categorization has started. Any contributions in further developing it are warmly welcome. Hoverfish Talk 15:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry. My mistake.

I knew I'd made a mistake with the title, but I couldn't get back to my computer. I've fixed it since. HalfShadow 20:18, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006

The January 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Your question

Hmm, I'm afraid I'm not much of a television/cinema expert. I do, however, have access to very decent dictionaries and a few friends who work as interpreters in those fields. "Художник-постановщик" indeed best translates as "art director", a translation that's also often used for "художественный руководитель". The latter, however, more accurately translates as either "artistic (or creative) director" or "artistic administrator". As for the differences between the two, I am sorry, that beats me. It looks that "х-постановщик" has more say in things directly dealing with the play/movie/TV program, while "х. руководитель" is more in charge of art-related things around the production process. At least that's what my friends tell me, anyway :) I don't have anything reference-worthy, unfortunately. Hope this helps at least a little.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 23:01, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

re: The Snow Queen (1957 film) where the Snow Queen's ice palace is.

Hi, Esn, well, in the novel we find out that it is Spitzbergen, but I removed reference to it from the film plot because it is just said to be in the far north or in "Finland." This is from the "Fifth Story" of the "Snow Queen": '"There's ice and snow, it's so blissful and grand!" said the reindeer. "There you can bound freely through the great sparkling valleys! That's where the Snow Queen has her summer tent, but her permanent castle is up near the North Pole, on the island called Spitsbergen"' (p. 196, Hans Christian Andersen: Fairy Tales, trans. by Triina Nunnally, New York: Viking, 2004).--Drboisclair 05:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Rest On Your Shoulder

About that film "Rest on your shoulder" I have no idea what it is at the moment. I too have confirmed it is a film but that is it. Unless I find the native language name, I probably am stuck. Benjwong 23:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Cerkiew

Thanks for taking the time to be a voice of reason in a debate. KP Botany 14:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Wonderfullgrimm.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wonderfullgrimm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

About Pili (TV series)

Pili puppet TV show is not stop motion at all. There is not stop motion in it and the puppets are not the type that use strings. It's called budaixi or glove puppetry.

WP:Films Newsletter

The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 07:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Deletion Review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Robert Benfer. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Esn 04:51, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Are you sure you've got the right person? I don't appear to have deleted that page. Stifle (talk) 22:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Novels newsletter : Issue IX - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 16:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

jack the giant killer

Since you added a small refference to the movie,perhaps you can help adding/improving Jack the Giant Killer(film).Nadirali نادرالی 05:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Klayworld.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Klayworld.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Toon years

Late last night, I decided to do a test page concerning years in the animation industry. It centred on one I've been thinking of doing for some time now, 1985.

Yes, Wikipedia has year pages dealing with film, but isn't it time someone did the same thing for cartoons?

This is only the start of a series that will aim to be a really good resource for fans of the genre. Please leave messages and opinioins here and on my talk. --Slgrandson (page - messages - contribs) 19:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Limelight.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Limelight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

for you

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		You obviously showed interest in helping me improve the article I created by adding that image.Thanks for doing so,as it could not look as accurate without the image. Nadirali نادرالی

Thanks. :) Esn 07:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Lyle123 sockpuppets

I've blocked the accounts and I am cleaning up the fake articles he created; thanks for letting me know. —tregoweth (talk) 22:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Moscow

You are a member of WikiProject Russia. I wanted to let you know the article Moscow is in Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Moscow list now. --Hirakawacho 10:54, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

list of animated feature-length films/Lyle123

I've removed the notice; I was a bit hasty in slapping it on there.

Also, I had a feeling BarryGuy04 might be a Lyle123 sockpuppet; one more fake article and I'll block the account. —tregoweth (talk) 01:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

The Hunchbacked Little Horse

Hi ESN, the image is a production sketch, not a filmstill. It's scanned from Ivanov-Vano's autobiography Кадр за кадром. timo 08:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me. :) I've updated the information on the image now. By the way, you may already know about this, but if not you may be interested: I think a lot of Russia's leading animators/directors can be found online at places like this (there are also some similar groups, including one dedicated to Norshteyn). Through a quick glance, I already found Mikhail Tyumelya (who made The Magic Pipe). Esn 09:56, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Notability (films) nominated for deletion

Wikipedia:Notability (films) nominated for deletion This is a courtesy notice: Wikipedia:Notability (films) has been nominated for deletion. --Kevin Murray 00:35, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films February Newsletter

The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 22:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Award text

Hi Esn, yes, you can adjust the text. I guess it's better to say ...to Wikipedians who make outstanding contributions to WikiProject Films... or something equivalent. If you see any more improvements, feel free to make them. Cheers! Hoverfish Talk 08:13, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey Thanks for the award. I am taking a break from the film stuff at the moment. Will certainly get back to it later. There is a ton of projects on my to-do list. Benjwong 17:41, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Ашик Кериб

Прекрасная идея! I already thought of that but wasn't sure how to do it--thanks for the link. K. Lásztocska 16:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

CInema templates

I am very glad you like my cinema templates. I am drawing one up for each country at present. Each article related to the cinema of each country should have this template as the footer. My goal is to connect each article for each country's cinema related articles together

My latest is

♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 21:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Absolutely! I feel there should be one main article Cinema of Russia but in the sub sections have :main article: links to CInema of the Soviet Union etc which I think has been deleted. THis should be sorted thanks for bringing it to my attention ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 21:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

It is a tricky business with countries with a long history of political and regime change Germany is also difficult. If anything as the others exist I am thinking Cinema of Russia should cover the industry in the country of Russia from 1989-present ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 21:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

I beleive there may be Category:Soviet films ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 22:06, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes Russian-language films should cover the entire history I would prefer to keep the film cats as basic as possible Hmm. I would just suggest Category:Soviet films for every film up to 1989 (the combined of all SSR'S) and then after 1989/1990 just Category:Russian films Category:Ukrainian films etc ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 22:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

I know its a difficult one and I agree with you there should definately not be an overlap. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 22:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes by Russian Empire do you mean pre 1917? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 22:16, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

I would suggest three categories then for the three major regimes of Russian history.

• Pre 1917 - Category:Russian Empire films
• 1917-1990 Soviet Union- Category:Soviet films
• 1990-present Category:Russian films,Category:Armenian films, [[Category:Ukrainian films etc etc

Category:Russian-language films should cover every film ever made in Russian language regardless of boundary or time ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 22:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC) ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 22:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes but I beleive this is politically correct - agood idea would be if it doesn't exist already to find a list of pre 1917 Russian films and start a few articles to create the category. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 22:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

If it was deleted before I would suggest you bring it up at film project discussion to reach a consensus on it to gain support. I would imagine there are far more than two films made before 1917!!! Anyway I've just created the Cinema of Korea template . ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 22:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

It is of course no different than such a category as Category:Films of Weimar Germany. But if there are only a few films pre 1917 it seems more difficult to support a category. If it had for instance 20 articles it might look a bit more valid ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 22:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

I would like to ask you to notify us immediately at WP Films if you see any more film categories or lists up for deletion. Things start dissapearing here and there at random and no one notifies us. You could have saved Russian Empire films if you only had given us a warning. We have to either re-create it when we have enough films for it or find another name for them. And they were talking also of deleting German periods? They should bring such things up in films. Lately we've had lots of such deletions, in film lists too and I was lucky to notice in time few of them only. Hoverfish Talk 23:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Film template

Hi Esn! If this is within your field of interests, your opinion would be appreciated in Template talk:Film. Thanks. Hoverfish Talk 09:19, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Unbelievably a certain user has put all of the cinema templates up for deletion. I beelive they serve a great purpose for establishing a better understanding and connection between articles of each industry to make them flow. But in totla haste he has gone ahead and proposed the lot. If my hard work is deleted I really feel that I should leave wikipedia for good. I am willing to limit the use of the American template but not the others. It will affect thousands of articles already.

Please leave your view at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 March 13 THanks

♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 13:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Apology

I sincerely apologize for AfDing Ghastly's Ghastly Comic without checking for notability. If that were done, I would have not done the AfD, and everyone would be happy. - A Link to the Past (talk) 21:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Toy Story 3

Why did you change the release date to 2009? Lee Unkrich corrected Catmull that it was 2010, not 2009. RMS Oceanic 08:39, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Captain Sabertooth

Hi, this article could use some language and grammar checks. More info would also be appreciated.Summer Song 18:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject Actors and Filmmakers

Hey see my proposals at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Actor and Filmmakers and the main WP Film and Biography talk page. Know anybody who is interested? Actors and all film people articles need a body on wikipedia to upkeep them asthey need more focus -it would be a part of Biogrpahy and Film. If you are interested or know somebody who would be, please let them know and whether you think it is a good progession for the project or not. Please leave your views at the council or biogrpahy main talk page. THanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"I've been expecting you"} 14:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Le Roi et l'oiseau

Hi, I think it would be a good idea to make two infoboxes for this article and to enter in each the different data. I don't really see the point of making two articles, as most of the plot must be the same. In the List of French films, I will enter both titles, linking to the same articles, as the older one got some extra awards. In the newer one I guess I should mention remake(?) Hoverfish Talk 20:50, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

March WP:FILMS Newsletter

The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 00:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Your suggestion

Thank you for support. Could you then go to my project page and edit the article to make it more neutral and improve? I suggest new name "Internet brigades" as in Russian Wikipedia. But it could be wider/different, for example, "active measures in the Internet" ("active measures" also mean disinformation, hacking, mass-survelliance (SORM), etc.). Biophys 01:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Limiting criteria for inclusion in film lists

Although I had pushed a bit for the reawakening of Notability (films), I didn't take part in the discussion. I do admire however the efforts you did. The reason I stayed out is that on the one hand Zadignoze attempted his own version, on the other it became a battlegrownd of policy matters, which wasn't what I would have wished, plus I am lousy in following policy arguments. Now there is a similar issue I set for discussion in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/List and navigation management. It has nothing to do with which film articles pass notability criteria, but how far we should go in listing each countrie's films. I would appreciate you input. Hoverfish Talk 22:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Translating Princess Iron Fan

I saw your message. However I am not the best person for this. Usually I convert straight mandarin asciis through a number of converters and doublecheck my translation with other people's help. My chinese is not so good reading off an image for example. Straight translation without ascii or pingyin is actually quite laborious for me. If you can get it from mandarin to cantonese in sound or ascii, I'll convert it to straight english for sure. Anyhow, if you hop onto Wikiproject China, there must be a number of people far more skilled in the language. Benjwong 16:48, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

If you leave a message at wikiproject China hopefully someone will get back to you. I almost wished the movie was in Cantonese, in that case I would put it to English directly in one shot. Benjwong 00:31, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Notability (films)

Hi, you may want to revisit Wikipedia talk:Notability (films) where protection has been removed and the proponents have immediately pushed for accepted status. You had expressed some concern a while back. Thanks. --Kevin Murray 22:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

I really wish I could also help out (see my name back in early December talk), but most of it goes way over my head. Hoverfish Talk 08:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - April 2007

The April 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by Grafikbot 11:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Computer Animated Films List

The only section that I want up is the list of films by year. This is very convenient and allows you to see the increasing number of CGI films through the years. Should this be it's own article? ~Cnota

So you got it Translated

I was really impressed to see the translated list in Princess Iron Fan. It is just crazy to be watching a 1940s classic like that in 2007!!!??!?!! That is some timeless work. If I am eligible in any way to give you some wiki-award, let me know. If I can give the people who helped you translate some award, I am all for it too. Benjwong 04:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

BRIC

I admit, I wrestled with what to refer to China's political system as in the CEMENT section of the BRIC article. I am now wondering if Single-party state might be the best description/link? --Legis (talk - contributions) 09:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

TMNT & Meet the Robinsons

The release dates are WRONG. I know IMDb has them as such, but they do not update those, users do, and it takes 2-6 weeks. Boxofficemojo.com keeps up with when things are released to the day. What are you thinking? Do you live in the United States or keep up with movies? I'm just seriously wondering why you think they came out when they didn't. Cnota

How is that vandalism?

Russia and Israel are not important when it comes to movie box office numbers or release dates. You are being quite ridiculous.Cnota

Encyclopedia of Domestic Animation

On 25 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Encyclopedia of Domestic Animation, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 05:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 21:08, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

re: Wrong interwikilink

Hi Esn. Sorry about this edit. SundarBot is just a plain-vanilla interwiki bot that I downloaded. I'll try to incorporate your suggestion for disambiguating movie names to the code, if possible. Thanks for the notice. -- Sundar ^{\talk \contribs} 13:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - May 2007

The May 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 16:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Plumiferos.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Plumiferos.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 23:07, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 21:44, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Encyclopediarussiananimation2007.JPG

I have tagged Image:Encyclopediarussiananimation2007.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 12:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Ignosticism introduction

I've left a response to your last message on Talk:Ignosticism#Changed the intro, and I'd like to hear your thoughts before I change the introduction again. Thanks! — Elembis (talk · contribs) 20:58, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIII - June 2007

The June 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 14:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Solarisposter2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Solarisposter2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wonderfullgrimm.jpg

I have tagged Image:Wonderfullgrimm.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 20:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Vukdvd.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Vukdvd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 18:52, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 07:59, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: favourable

Hello! Sorry for that, it's my FF who suggested this correction! Please feel free to revert that! Thanks! --Vlad|-> 06:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV - July 2007

The July 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 17:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

The Life of Buddha

I just wanted to call your attention to a third film in the Thai animation category, The Life of Buddha, due for release on Dec. 5, 2007. — WiseKwai 17:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

murder vs. assassinated

I agree with you. Let me ask you this though... what is the point of a category of activists that happen to have been murdered? I would argue there is very little of value in it. Plus, the category wasnt empty until yesterday, when I started moving 50 or so activisits that were specifically refered to as being victimes of "assassination" in their WP bios. I feel it was just a source of confusion and decided to clear the whole thing out. Now, if you want to learn about all the activists that have been killed for what they believe, you can. Envirocorrector 17:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the tips, I didn't know categories don't redirect. I don't, however, appreciate the tone or accusation of vandalism. If you go through my changes, you find the vast majority really are very clearly assassinated activists who had been miscategorized (see Chico Mendez as example A. I agree it's not always clear who is killed for what reason, but that should be sorted out by the editors of the individuals article (who presumably know something about the person). I stand by my previous argument that if someone is an activist and happens to be murdered, they don't need to be categorized for their unfortunate luck, especially if it just makes things hard on people trying to make categories. Envirocorrector 22:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi, No hard feelings. My fault with the lack of etiquette on doing it right. You probably saw that I put the category up for discussed deletion. Obviously, feel free to weigh in there. Envirocorrector 11:04, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 18:28, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XV - August 2007

The August 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

British Raj/India

You have recently discussed the name of the British Raj article at Talk:British Raj and might be interested in a move request there. — AjaxSmack 07:20, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Belarusian wikipedia

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Belarusian wikipedia, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Belarusian wikipedia is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Belarusian wikipedia, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:32, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Belarusian Wikipedia article

The deletion log says:

14:39, 25 August 2007 Mattbr (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Belarusian Wikipedia" ‎ (Speedy deleted per (CSD r1), was a redirect to an non-existent page. Using TW.)

The non-existent page it redirected to was Belarusian Wikipedias which was deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belarusian Wikipedias. Such redirects can be speedily deleted according to WP:CSD#R1. mattbr 18:59, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 03:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Random Thanks

I have no idea how Wikipedia works but anyway, I guess this is the place for thanks? Looking at all the work you have done on Wikipedia, and even YouTube (heck, you've made me buy the Jiri Barta DVD in a second!), I'm starting to believe that you are the man who made me discover east-european animation, and even animation from my own country such as Jacques Drouin. I'm certainly not the only one: what you have done for animation is great.
3 September 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.68.110.106 (talk) 05:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

I don't know what to say, but thank you for the thank you. Esn 01:29, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Girlshy4sheetmusic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Girlshy4sheetmusic.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Crystalnovel.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Crystalnovel.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI - September 2007

The September 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 09:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Old Man and the Sea question

Hello. Did you provide the information on the English and French language DVDs in the article for Petrov's "Old Man and the Sea" article? If so, I have a question. You mention that the French language DVD has some of Petrov's older films included. Does this apply to the French language DVD that's sold in Canada or just the version sold in France? Thanks. -Matt Goode —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.171.63.89 (talk) 21:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure, but I think that the Canadian French DVD is just the Canadian English DVD with a different cover. The Canadian English DVD also has a French menu and soundtrack. Its cover is also different to the one from France. Compare: [1] with [2]. Although the picture is the same, the stuff around the edges is different. You could also wait a year or so until Petrov's My Love is out on DVD. Perhaps it will contains some of his other films as well. Or you could go to a website like cine-clasico. :p Esn 22:45, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.101.79.40 (talk) 03:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call

Hey fellow Wikipedian! Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name to the Active Members list. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. We also have several task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

Also, elections for Project Coordinators are currently in sign-up phase. If you would be interested in running, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. You can see more information on the positions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators. Thanks and happy editing!

An automatic notification by BrownBot 23:12, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Burma riots

As noted in the edit history, China's interest in preserving stability is already in the BBC citation in the sentence before it. Information from the same source can be placed after its citation. -- Permafrost 06:27, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter

The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 22:58, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XVII - October 2007

The October 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 09:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Re:DRV

I have replied there. I trust that, considering my comment, you will do some better investigation next time, before submitting an article to DRV. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 07:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Restored, as well as the talk page, and the DRV closed. If a mistake happens like that again, it is often better simply to ask the sysop who made the error. Once again, I really do apologise - I at first thought that it was an ignorant editor who had not bothered to consider what they were doing, but, of course, I was very mistaken; you could be an administrator. Regards, -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 08:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Konyok3.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Konyok3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Alex Spade 17:53, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:HaroldLloyd dvd2.jpg

I have tagged Image:HaroldLloyd dvd2.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Eachwiped 04:22, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XVIII - November 2007

The November 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 15:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Alexeieff nose.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Alexeieff nose.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Llorcs (talk) 08:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIX - December 2007

The December 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 11:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Forheavenssake2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Forheavenssake2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:10, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XX - January 2008

The January 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 13:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Harold Lloyd

Template:Harold Lloyd has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Wildhartlivie (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Speedygerman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Speedygerman.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXI - February 2008

The February 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot --11:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thetwelvemonths.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thetwelvemonths.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thetwelvemonths2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thetwelvemonths2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Forheavenssake3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Forheavenssake3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Druttenochgena.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Druttenochgena.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Comeandsee3.jpg

I have tagged Image:Comeandsee3.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 01:01, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Motherpudovkin.jpg

I have tagged Image:Motherpudovkin.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 15:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Kingofhearts2.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Kingofhearts2.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 18:18, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Krysardvd.jpg

I have tagged Image:Krysardvd.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 19:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Beregis.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Beregis.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:24, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXII - March 2008

The March 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot --16:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)