User talk:EllenCT/Archive 5

Latest comment: 8 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 30 December 2015
 < Archive 4    Archive 5    Archive 6 >
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  5 -  6 -  7 -  8 -  9 -  ... (up to 100)


Archive for 2nd half 2015

Please comment on Talk:Economy of Argentina

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Economy of Argentina. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

15:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

 

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

  • Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
  • Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
  • Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
  • Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
  • Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
  • Research coordinators: run reference services



Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on Talk:Credit Union Deposit Insurance Corporation (Prince Edward Island)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Credit Union Deposit Insurance Corporation (Prince Edward Island). Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

15:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

Please comment on Talk:Americans for Prosperity

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Americans for Prosperity. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

03:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

Please comment on Talk:United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

Please comment on Talk:Supply-side economics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Supply-side economics. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

15:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

Please comment on Talk:Corvette leaf spring

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Corvette leaf spring. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

14:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

16:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Association for Progressive Communications

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Association for Progressive Communications. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

Gender balance

In case you missed it on Jimbo's talk page. User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_185#Gender_balance All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 18:55, 20 August 2015 (UTC).Reply

”Socialism never took root in America”

Probably not authentic [53] Peter Damian (talk) 13:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Peter Damian: Thank you![54] EllenCT (talk) 14:11, 23 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

13:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Google

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Google. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

21:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Monsanto legal cases

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monsanto legal cases. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

Just checking in

You haven't edited in two days. Let me know if you still want to do this. Serendipodous 17:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

are you planning to do the top 25? Serendipodous 15:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Serendipodous: I've been looking at the exclusion patterns, and I want to take some more time to study them. What can you tell me about articles like Overview effect which get almost entirely mobile views, according to the current WP:TOP5000? Because it was transient, [63] I think it should be ignored. I am not planning to comment on 11-15. EllenCT (talk) 16:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
We don't have a lot of info about the all-mobile views, but one in particular, Angelsberg,was due to a bot basically load-testing the mobile Wiki servers. Others are probably spyware botnets checking for internet traffic. Basically, if it gets almost all mobile views, or almost none, you can bet it ain't human doing it. Serendipodous 16:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
The Top 25 still hasn't been published. It's less than 48 hours until the raw data gets updated. If you're having problems or do not wish to publish the report, let me know so I can do it. Serendipodous 14:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Serendipodous: I don't want to comment on items 11 through 25. I don't see how it serves the readers. I'm disappointed in the exclusion list properties I'm seeing and would prefer to comment on the most edited articles instead of the most popular articles, in general. EllenCT (talk) 14:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
I wish you'd been clearer earlier; you said "11-15" in your last post. As for exclusions, we've always made it clear that we exclude abnormally low or abnormally high mobile counts. We've been editing this report for years and are pretty solid on the patterns that indicate a false result. If you feel that our research isn't enough, you're free to conduct your own. As to whether it helps the readers or not, well the readers seem to think so; the 25 report gets thousands of views a month. Serendipodous 14:57, 11 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

17:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Please be aware of the sanctions

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to electronic cigarettes.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

QuackGuru (talk) 19:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on Talk:Conduit (company)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Conduit (company). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring on electronic cigarette talk page?

 

Your recent editing history at Talk:Electronic cigarette‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war.[76][77] To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. QuackGuru (talk) 03:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

16:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

18:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

You've been reported for repeated edit warring.

[101] — Preceding unsigned comment added by VictorD7 (talkcontribs)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#VictorD7

EllenCT, right now, there are numerous diffs presented to support VictorD7's case against you and you have posted little in support of your side. Right now, it looks like this case will be closed without action. Liz Read! Talk! 22:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Liz: Why do you think it is so difficult for arbitrators to see that in the diffs which Victor has presented, I have replaced his right-wing non-peer reviewed think tank sources with sources in agreement with the conclusive peer reviewed literature reviews? He's obviously just going to keep complaining, so if they ignore it this time he'll probably bring it up again. EllenCT (talk) 18:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
EllenCT, you are asking administrators, who take time out from their editing tasks to look at all of those diffs that are actually supporting Victor's case against you, to see what you want them to see. That is not a successful strategy.
An editor coming to these forums has to put forward a case, presenting diffs that support specific points they are making. What seems obvious to you is not obvious to admins who don't know anything about you or other involved editors or the disputed articles. My advice goes to anyone bringing a charge at ANI or AE...you need to be clear, direct, concise and explicit. Say what the problems are and give evidence that demonstrates each problem. By reproducing a 3RR charge against you and not providing details in your defense, the admins and editors participating in this discussion are unlikely to see Victor as the problem. If you don't have the evidence ready to support your argument, it's best not to even file a complaint at a noticeboard. Liz Read! Talk! 19:58, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

Please comment on Talk:Warminster Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Warminster Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 27 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

top25

Greetings, Ellen! Any interest in doing the Top25 again this week? It's my week if trading off with Serendipodous, though if you did it I'd do next week. Looks pretty straightforward at the top, with religious subjects led by the Pope moving in amongst the pop culture entires. George Hotz is due to Reddit [102] as is Robert Black (serial killer)[103]. I'm sadly not surprised that none of the articles relating to the 2015 Hajj stampede are in the top 25. 700+ people dead in many places (airline crashes come to mind) would generate much much more attention. But in a city closed to non-Muslims with no apparent social media coverage, supervised by a government that has a history of saying accidents like this are God's will, people don't care? Sad.--Milowenthasspoken 12:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Milowent: okay, but I can't do it until Wednesday. Will that work? If so, I'll try to do all 25 by Thursday. EllenCT (talk) 15:06, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Yes, that should work fine for the Signpost, too. Thanks!--Milowenthasspoken 18:24, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Milowent:, that's interesting because on this page of the top 20 edited pages, the Hajj stampede was #1. The article may not have drawn attention from readers but it drew a lot of attention from Wikipedia editors. Liz Read! Talk! 20:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Ellen, obviously we did not come together back here, though I would love to get your help in the future if you are still interested! Feel free to email me to discuss off-wiki if you wish. Cheers.--Milowenthasspoken 14:54, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

15:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Genetically modified organisms arbitration case opened

You may opt-out of future notification regarding this case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms/Notification list. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms/Evidence. Please add your evidence by October 12, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Genetically modified organisms/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC) on behalf of L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 20:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

You've been reported on WP:AE.

[116] VictorD7 (talk) 00:16, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture

You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture

 
  • Dates: 15 to 25 October 2015
  • Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event
  • Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR): Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
  • Sponsor: Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in association with Beverly Willis Architecture Foundation, Women in Design, and Wikiproject Women Wikipedia Design
  • Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a series of "physical" Guggenheim edit-a-thons. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in architecture and design to participate. The campaign aims to further the goals of Ada Lovelace Day for STEM, and Art+Feminism for art, in a field that by its nature combines both. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over a week and a half, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in this field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
  • RSVP and learn more: →here←--Ipigott (talk) 14:56, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

Please comment on Talk:Volkswagen emissions violations

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Volkswagen emissions violations. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

18:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration temporary injunction for the Genetically modified organisms arbitration case

You are receiving this message because you are on the notification list for this case. You may opt-out at any time The Arbitration Committee has enacted the following temporary injunction, to expire at the closure of the Genetically modified organisms arbitration case:

  1. Standard discretionary sanctions are authorised for all pages relating to to genetically modified organisms and agricultural biotechnology, including glyphosate, broadly interpreted, for as long as this arbitration case remains open. Any uninvolved administrator may levy restrictions as an arbitration enforcement action on users editing in this topic area, after an initial warning.
  2. Editors are prohibited from making more than one revert per page per day within the topic area found in part 1 of this injunction, subject to the usual exemptions.

For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) (via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC))Reply

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration temporary injunction for the Genetically modified organisms arbitration case

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

16:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Category talk:Establishments

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Category talk:Establishments. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

16:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Leschi (fireboat)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Leschi (fireboat). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 5

 
Newsletter • October 2015

Hello there! Happy to be writing this newsletter once more. This month:

We did it!

In July, we launched five pilot WikiProjects: WikiProjects Cannabis, Evolutionary Biology, Ghana, Hampshire, and Women's Health. We also use the new design, named "WPX UI," on WikiProject Women in Technology, Women in Red, WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health. We are currently looking for projects for the next round of testing. If you are interested, please sign up on the Pilots page.

Shortly after our launch we presented at Wikimania 2015. Our slides are on Wikimedia Commons.

Then after all that work, we went through the process of figuring out whether we accomplished our goal. We reached out to participants on the redesigned WikiProjects, and we asked them to complete a survey. (If you filled out your survey—thank you!) While there are still some issues with the WikiProject tools and the new design, there appears to be general satisfaction (at least among those who responded). The results of the survey and more are documented in our grant report filed with the Wikimedia Foundation.

The work continues!

There is more work that needs to be done, so we have applied for a renewal of our grant. Comments on the proposal are welcome. We would like to improve what we have already started on the English Wikipedia and to also expand to Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata. Why those? Because they are multilingual projects and because there needs to be better coordination across Wikimedia projects. More details are available in the renewal proposal.

How can the Wikimedia Foundation support WikiProjects?

The Wikimedia Developer Summit will be held in San Francisco in January 2016. The recently established Community Tech team at the Wikimedia Foundation is interested in investigating what technical support they can provide for WikiProjects, i.e., support beyond just templates and bots. I have plenty of opinions myself, but I want to hear what you think. The session is being planned on Phabricator, the Wikimedia bug tracker. If you are not familiar with Phabricator, you can log in with your Wikipedia username and password through the "Login or Register: MediaWiki" button on the login page. Your feedback can help make editing Wikipedia a better experience.


Until next time,

Harej (talk) 09:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

18:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Economic history

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Economic history. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

16:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

hello!

Hey Ellen, hope all is well, see you've been away for a bit. I've done some work at the WP:TOP25 lately including a new header for that page. I've included a link on the banner to the most edited report to give it more attention, though it is not technically part of the Top 25 data. I hope you think that is OK. Cheers.--Milowenthasspoken 22:57, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on Talk:Socialism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Socialism. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

17:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Genetically modified organisms arbitration proposed decision posted

Hi EllenCT. A proposed decision has been posted for the Genetically modified organisms arbitration case, for which you are on the notification list. Comments about the proposed decision are welcome at the proposed decision talk page. Thank you. For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on Talk:Killing of Cecil the lion

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Killing of Cecil the lion. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

19:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

Please comment on Talk:Trans-Pacific Partnership

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trans-Pacific Partnership. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Don't Cry for Me Argentina

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33i_BAhuiE0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.90.199.85 (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

20:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

Please comment on Talk:Jude Wanniski

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jude Wanniski. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

16:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

17:52, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Portal talk:Current events/2015 November 17

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Portal talk:Current events/2015 November 17. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

17:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Royal Households of the United Kingdom

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Royal Households of the United Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

18:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:ExxonMobil

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:ExxonMobil. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 24 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 30 December 2015