E bruton

Good entrance

THanks for the Ada Lovelace biography Victuallers (talk) 21:03, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Ada Lovelace Day

		Ada Lovelace Award
		Hi E. Bruton, Thank you for participating in the Ada Lovelace Day editathon! For your work on the Hertha Marks Ayrton article and for starting the Anne Elizabeth Ball and Alice Everett articles, I'm presenting you with the Ada Lovelace Award. Your contributions are very appreciated. Cheers, Gobōnobō + c 14:03, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! E bruton (talk) 15:46, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Anne Elizabeth Ball

If you have a minute, would you be able to weigh in at Template:Did you know nominations/Anne Elizabeth Ball? We have some references that say Ball was born in Youghal and are wondering if there was a source that placed her birth in Cobh. Thank you, Gobōnobō ^{+ c} 12:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. This is the only thing holding up the nomination. Hopefully, it's a quick fix. Anne (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Sorry I haven't logged on for awhile. I've added a citation to the Oxford DNB for her place of birth and replied to your DYK query. I'm really pleased to see this included on the DYK entry. Thanks!

E bruton (talk) 15:25, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Anne Elizabeth Ball

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

E bruton (talk) 18:21, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK nom

Template:Did you know nominations/Beryl Platt, Baroness Platt of Writtle. Thanks for contributing at the event! Johnbod (talk) 01:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Beryl Platt, Baroness Platt of Writtle

The DYK project (nominate) 10:02, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! E bruton (talk) 10:37, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

You are invited! Join us remotely! World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

Dates: 8 to 29 November 2015 Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR) in collaboration with Women scientists: Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you! Sponsor: New York Academy of Sciences Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a "phyisical" event during the afternoon of Sunday, November 22 in New York City. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in science to participate. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over three weeks, new participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in the field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and learn more: →here←--Ipigott (talk) 10:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thanks for your work improving the Elizabeth Moran article. I see you already have an Ada Lovelace Award. Great to see that you're continuing to work on women in science articles. Cheers, MartinPoulter (talk) 15:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! E bruton (talk) 11:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Contacting Editors from the Ada Lovelace Editathons

Hi E bruton,

I hope you don’t mind me contacting you via your talk page. I’m a new Editor to Wikipedia, part of a small research team based at the University of Birmingham in the UK. I’m getting in touch as we’re trying to contact all the Editors who were involved in the Ada Lovelace Editathons in Oxford or London. If you have been, or still are, involved in editing, whatever the scale of your involvement, we would be very grateful for the opportunity to talk to you about your experiences. In the first instance, we’ve set up a short (10 minute) survey, which you can access via my User Talk Pages. If you are interested in helping with our research project, please can you drop me a line?

Thanks, RuthPage (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Enjoyed your talk at Wellcome. I drink too much tea too but a virtual cuppa shouldn't stop you sleeping. Andrew D. (talk) 14:24, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!

E bruton (talk) 16:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Gertrude Rosenblum Williams) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Gertrude Rosenblum Williams, E bruton!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add additional references that substantiate all claims in the article. The source provided is insufficient.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 16:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Welcome back!

Welcome back to contributing to Wikipedia! There are plenty of opportunities to make fixes, like you recently did to Colombian press. Its really important that we continue to expand articles as the opportunity allows! Please let me know if you need help finding those opportunities.Sadads (talk) 17:25, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Mary Size.

User:Cwmhiraeth while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

An interesting and well-written article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:16, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

If it's not too meta, thanks for saying thanks

E bruton (talk) 21:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Medical Artists Association of Great Britain moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Medical Artists Association of Great Britain, does not have third party sources to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:45, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Two of the three sources - https://www.medical-artist.com/about-medical-artist/memberships-training/medical-artists-association-carries-out-professional-medical-art-course/ and https://www.artbiogs.co.uk/2/societies/medical-artists-association-great-britain - are third party sources so I have resubmitted it as is. If you feel these are not third party sources, I would be interested to know why you think so.

E bruton (talk) 10:19, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

April 2020

Your addition to RAF Grove has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Thomas Lucas (shorthand)

Hello! Your submission of Thomas Lucas (shorthand) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 15:26, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, since the template is closed, let's continue our discussion here. "Hook refs are verified and cited inline" is simply shorthand for a review of the DYK criteria. I'm verifying that I saw the hook fact in the online sources, and that the sources were given as citations at the end of the sentences in which they appeared. You did the notelist fine; the blue background is gone now! Best, Yoninah (talk) 21:56, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks very much for clarifying that - much appreciated. This is my first DYK nomination so lots to learn E bruton (talk) 11:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome. If you have any future questions, I'd be happy to answer them. Yoninah (talk) 11:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Thomas Lucas (educator)

On 13 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thomas Lucas (educator), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British educator Thomas Lucas created an embossed shorthand to teach the blind to read by touch around 1830–1832, before the introduction of Braille in the UK? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Thomas Lucas (educator)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know E bruton (talk) 13:20, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Women in Red

Hi there, E bruton, and welcome to Women in Red. On the basis of all the interesting women's biographies you have created over the years, it looks as if you are going to be a useful contributor. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks very much, I look forward to contributing to the project. E bruton (talk) 20:33, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

James Dunn Comment

Enjoyed that! Thanks! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

- Thanks very much and thanks for your swift copy editing. E bruton (talk) 16:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Elizabeth Moran (scientist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elizabeth Moran (scientist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Moran (scientist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HyperAccelerated (talk) 23:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)