Dooiney

Welcome!

Hello, Dooiney, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Green Bay Country Club, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Maen. K. A. (talk) 21:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Green Bay Country Club

A tag has been placed on Green Bay Country Club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Maen. K. A. (talk) 21:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

FYI conflict of interest guideline

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Green Bay Country Club, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. — Athaenara ✉ 22:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Newspaper or magazine articles

Please add as references newspaper or magazine articles about the Green Bay Country Club. Articles without references are at risk of being deleted. -- Eastmain (talk) 02:14, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of List of Characters and Races of Mario Kart Wii

A tag has been placed on List of Characters and Races of Mario Kart Wii requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 01:29, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jason Bay, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Muboshgu (talk) 17:20, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

This is a friendly note. It says clearly where you edited Bay's team: "Jason Bay is not, and will not be, a member of the Mets until the team officially announces it (press conference) and until he passes his physical. Do not change the team until an official announcement is made." So please don't edit this again. --Muboshgu (talk) 17:22, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page 2010 Pro Bowl. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 00:22, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2010 NFL Draft, you will be blocked from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:22, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Changing capitalization of player positions

Please do not do this. It does not follow WP:MOS and it's just unnecessary. Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 13:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Conor Jackson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 02:27, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Rickie Weeks. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 02:32, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Roy Halladay. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Please do not put periods at the end of captions where they are not full sentences. Thanks. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 11:49, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

ANI notification

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 02:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. SGGH ^ping! 09:22, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Player image captions

Please stop punctuating sentence fragments with periods when adding captions to MLB player infoboxes. It's grammatically incorrect and against the Manual of Style. Thanks. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 16:59, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Again, please be sure to observe this stylistic convention. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Can you at least acknowledge that you've read these messages? Dabomb87 (talk) 22:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did in Roy Halladay, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Do not punctuate incomplete sentences, like those in image captions, with a period/full stop. Continuing to do so could be construed as willful ignorance of the numerous messages that many editors have left on your talk page. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 17:27, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's Manual of Style by using disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did to Adam LaRoche, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. It is obvious that you are either reading these messages and ignoring them or just don't care to listen to the concerns that other editors have raised on your talk page. If you continue to insert incorrect punctuation in image captions, you will be blocked. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 17:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

NBA captions

Hello, I can see that you have already been warned about not putting period in image captions, and have not listened. I would just like to sincerely ask that you stop this mistake, as it requires other editors to fix those mistakes. Thank you.--Henry talk 03:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Linking

Please make sure that you do not duplicate links that are repeated earlier in an article, like you did at List of Major League Baseball awards. Thanks. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 12:46, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Michigan highway infobox

WP:USRD/STDS says to limit the junction list in an infobox to 10 junctions. Many articles don't even have that many, limiting the list there to just the most major junctions. You've increased the length of some lists to 15 or even 20 junctions, not counting the termini. Please use some discretion to keep these lists to a reasonable size. As well, when dealing with I-96 and the I-x96s, if you use |country=USA instead of |state=MI, then the template won't link to the Michigan-specific version of the link, which just redirects to regular article. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 22:54, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Your edit to the infobox on U.S. Route 223 introduced an error. As it is explained in the body of the article, US 223 actually extends concurrently with US 127 to terminate at US 12. It might not be signed that way, but it does. I have reverted your change to restore the correct terminus. Imzadi 1979 → 02:04, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

When a junction lists multiple highways, the convention is to list the Interstates first, US Highways second and state highways third. If more than one of the same type are listed, normally each type is listed in numerical order. Please keep this in mind for your future edits. Imzadi 1979 → 01:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Missouri infobox

(edit conflict)Please, please, please read WP:USRD/STDS. Not only was Interstate 70 in Missouri over the ten junction limit in the infobox, each line of junctions was listed numerically! When using {{Jct}}, please list the Interstates first, then the US Highways, then state highways. Thank you. –Fredddie™ 01:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please review WP:USRD/STDS. –Fredddie™ 12:53, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

And again on Interstate 44. –Fredddie™ 22:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for You have failed to respond to the concerns of the community on your talk page.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rschen7754 22:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Bull-hole18.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bull-hole18.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Bull-hole8-pan.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bull-hole8-pan.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Bull-hole5-bach.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bull-hole5-bach.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:06, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Beautifulgrassandblueskyresized-2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Beautifulgrassandblueskyresized-2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:06, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Uridge long.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Uridge long.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Chicago street article suggestions

I see that you've been busy creating/editing articles related to Chicago's major streets. I have a few suggestions:

1. Add a "See also" section with links like:
   • Chicago portal (*{{portal-inline|Chicago}}) and U.S. Roads portal (*{{portal-inline|U.S. Roads}})
   • If there are already legitimate see also links, you can use {{portal}} to generate the float box on the right side, but if there aren't, I use the {{portal-inline}} version (which has to be repeated as separate lines in a bulleted list) to generate a nice bulleted list in the section.
2. Commons boxes (or the -inline variant) should go into an External links section, because Commons pages are not on Wikipedia. Portals are internal links because those are hosted on the same website.
3. Remove the {{Chicago}} navbox because none of those links in that box are to the street articles. Listing two navboxes makes them autocollapse, and then the reader doesn't see all of the related links in {{Streets in Chicago}} navbox, which are directly related.

The U.S. Roads project may not support/tag/assess/etc street articles, but the U.S. Roads portal includes streets in its scope. So few street articles are in good-enough shape to merit inclusion, but Prairie Avenue was the portal selected article last October; we always welcome street-related content for photos and DYKs as well. The WikiProject has "Roads" in its name because "U.S. Highways" is the name of one of its task forces related to the United States Numbered Highway System; the portal has "Roads" in its name because it includes all types of roads, streets included, in its scope. Imzadi 1979 → 22:04, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Illinois Route 58 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Glenview, Illinois

Illinois Route 83 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Willowbrook, Illinois

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:51, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Please explain

Your recent edits of Illinois routes, particularly I've noticed on 22 and 120, have left without explanation why you changed the major junctions infobox from "near" to "in" on certain cities. For 22 I clearly wrote in the edit summary that "based on multiple boundary maps, this interchange resides directly between Lincolnshire and Bannockburn and is therefor not 'in' Lincolnshire" and you changed it without explanation. I'm guessing that this is the case for other routes as well as some junctions are between 2 cities or not clearly in any city, so it would be nice if you provided an explanation as to why multiple maps are being disregarded. RoadView (talk) 18:36, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Jeffery Boulevard (Chicago)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Jeffery Boulevard (Chicago). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Jeffrey Boulevard (Chicago). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Jeffrey Boulevard (Chicago) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. --IShadowed 01:27, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Tri-State Tollway

Please see Talk:Tri-State Tollway#Infoboxes for the reason why the main infobox should not be modified to include the Edens Spur. Imzadi 1979 → 04:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Junction count in an infobox

Please be careful in updating the junction list in a highway article's infobox. USRD has a firm 8–10 limit in response to feedback we've received over the years at WP:FAC. In short, other groups of editors don't like long infoboxes, so we have that limit to keep them from getting too big. Second, we don't have to link the second usage of a city or location name in the list, and in fact, we shouldn't per WP:OVERLINK. Third, it's not necessary to list each end of a concurrency in an infobox, especially when there are no junctions in between. And fourth, it's not necessary, and in fact can make things harder, if you collapse the list by removing the line breaks. We're looking at implementing {{plainlist}} which would mean we actually format each junction as a separate line in a bulleted list in the wikicoding, but the template would not display the bullets. The reason that's done is so that screen readers and another adaptive technologies for the disabled or differently-abled would know that they are items in a list (the bullets), but the plainlist template coding would not display them that way. Removing the line breaks makes it harder to compare changes from one revision to another in "diff" mode. 22:50, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Oh, and don't put the segment headers in "Title Case"; Wikipedia uses "Sentence case" for headings and things. That means "Western Segment" is wrong, but "Western segment" is right in the infobox on US 2. The only exception is if the header/heading uses proper nouns that should be capitalized, but such a descriptive name is not a proper noun. Imzadi 1979 → 22:53, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Why did you remove Wisconsin Highway 41 from the browser order on U.S. Route 41 in Wisconsin. Just because it's a former designation doesn't mean that you should skip it. Imzadi 1979 → 02:02, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

I concur. Please stop doing this and discuss; this is standard procedure per WP:USRD/STDS. --Rschen7754 04:40, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Please see WP:USRD/STDS#Browsing, which states: The bottom section of the infobox provides a field for browsing all highways in a state in numerical order. Wisconsin Highway 41 exists as an article and historically existed as a once-used highway designation. It should be included in the U.S. Route 41 in Wisconsin article. Further removal of it could be termed vandalism. Please discuss this, and stop changing the browser to bypass the article, thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 04:41, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

This editor doesn't seem to reply to anything, at least not in the obvious place, which is here. They have been doing a huge amount of editing on road articles and some of what I've seen is questionable which makes me wonder about the vast majority which I haven't looked through. RoadView (talk) 09:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, that's the thing... I know very little about Midwest roads, so I have no idea if something is right or not. I already blocked this editor last year (which, granted, was a bit sketchy) but as I see it, we're running out of options here, and I'm not exactly sure what else to do. --Rschen7754 09:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, it's weird, I glanced over a few Wisconsin edits and for the most part the changes to the infobox appear to be fine. But I have noticed some very likely errors, such as Wisconsin Highway 11's junction with I-94/US-41; it was changed from Sturtevant to Mt. Pleasant, which is incorrect but I don't know what citation/source to use for something like this. Another thing is on the U.S. Route 12 in Wisconsin info box there are way too many junctions listed even though alot of it appears to be accurate. There are other similar issues too, and probably more with other states as well, but it would be incredibly time consuming and tedious to go through every edit. Again, most of it seems to be correct, so I'm not sure what happens in situations like these, especially when the user ostensibly refuses to have a discourse. RoadView (talk) 12:48, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Junction changes

You changed U.S. Route 141 from using {{jct|country=USA|I|43}} and {{jct|country=USA|US|8}} to using the |state=WI. While this is technically correct, it has the side effect of pointing the link to Interstate 43 (Wisconsin) instead of Interstate 43 and U.S. Route 8 in Wisconsin instead of U.S. Route 8. Since the state version of the link redirects to the undifferentiated link, you're linking to the intended target through a redirect. That's fine, but not necessary, and since we're not going to break out state-detail articles for I-43 (it's an intrastate Interstate) nor US 8 (250 of the 280 miles of it is in WI and the MI segment is only 2 miles), linking directly to the intended target if preferable. Imzadi 1979 → 00:10, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Do you ever reply or even read your talk page? Imzadi 1979 → 03:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic User:Dooiney. Thank you. --Rschen7754 07:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Green Bay Country Club

The article Green Bay Country Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim to notability, fails WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nouniquenames (talk) 10:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 13:18, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

• Your contribution history has a disturbing pattern of ignoring the concerns of others and refusing to communicate and address those concerns. It appears that many of your edits are counter to the guidelines in WP:MOS, which means other editors are having to spend time cleaning up your mistakes and misunderstandings. Many times, they have tried to approach you above to discuss them, but you have refused to engage. Communicating with other editors is required at Wikipedia in circumstances like this, it is not optional. To prevent further disruption, I have blocked you from editing for a period of two week, as your last block for one week was ineffective at getting you to address the concerns. Allow me to be blunt here: If you do not engage in discussion with other editors so that you can discuss and compromise on these edits, and resume your previous disruptive editing methods, you will be blocked for an indefinite period of time, meaning you will not be able to edit here at all. I am hoping that you will be wise enough to start a conversation here, so we can address these concerns. As always, any admin reviewing this block is free to user their best judgement without consultation from me if they feel a modification of this block is warranted. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 13:24, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeffrey Boulevard (Chicago)

A tag has been placed on Jeffrey Boulevard (Chicago) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, image description page, image talk page, mediawiki page, mediawiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, or user talk page from the article space.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DASHBot (talk) 18:11, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm Admrboltz. Your recent edit to the page Interstate 494 appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AdmrBoltz 14:52, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Indiana. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Infoboxes are for brief factiods. detailed info is already covered in the article and in the Wikilink. John from Idegon (talk) 19:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dooiney. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dooiney. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 18:46, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 18:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Howdy. Ease up on the long-winded edit summaries. GoodDay (talk) 00:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Vandalism at Elissa Slotkin

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Elissa Slotkin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 02:51, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

How the hell was that edit unconstructive? All I did was removed the sentence claiming Slotkin was a "moderate" Democrat. I removed it because in the very next sentence, it states she has voted in line with Biden 100% of the time. Those two sentences are very clearly contradicting to one another. I don't know about you, but that definitely does not sound like a moderate to me. Dooiney (talk) 03:33, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Are you seriously substituting your OR opinions for what a good RS says? That's a clear NPOV violation. Don't just remove properly sourced content, especially without an edit summary or discussion.

Biden happens to be fairly moderate, and even if he weren't, party loyalty is very important now, so her supporting him, instead of handing the GOP victories by creating division in the Democratic party, is strategically the smart thing to do, regardless of any minor differences between him and her. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 03:55, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

BTW, 90% of the time, when RS say something like the above, our logical job is to learn from them and bring our opinions into line with them. Follow the evidence. OTOH, if there is clear disagreement among mainstream RS, it's another matter. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 03:59, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

(Redacted). The only truly moderate Democrat is Joe Manchin. He will vote against Biden's positions a fair amount, especially when it comes to economics and "climate change." Manchin understands that the horrendous inflation and the looming depression (not recession, but depression) is by far and away the number one priority for over 99% of Americans at the moment.

And calling Biden a moderate is also a fucking joke. He has been a puppet his whole career, just going along with whoever the most vocal Democrats have been at the time. Yes, he took much more centrist views in 1990s when Clinton was president, but that is because the Democrats were only slightly left-of-center then. Most of what Biden says and does now echoes the America-hating communists of the Squad, and those idiots are as far from moderate as you can get, on either side of the political spectrum. There have been studies that have shown that Democrats have moved significantly further left since the 1990s than Republicans have moved right in that time frame. Republicans are closer to center than Democrats are today, and it is not even close.

(Redacted) Dooiney (talk) 22:09, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Biased sources

Only trusted journalistic citations should be used as sources for edits to Wikipedia article. In the 2022 Michigan gubernatorial election article, you used questionable and biased sources the Washington Times and the blog Legal Insurrection. Blogs are frowned upon as anyone can make a blog. Both of these sources have a right-wing slant. Steelbeard1 (talk) 01:35, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

So Wikipedia cannot have right-wing bias, but it can have left-wing bias? I could list countless examples of this if needed. It is a fact that Whitmer stated that schools were closed for only three months, and it is also a fact that schools in places like Ann Arbor, Detroit, and Flint were still closed in the opening months of 2022. And finally, please list at least five sources that have a right-wing slant, and then list at least five sources that have a left-wing slant, just so I can see that Wikipedia is doing everything they can to remain neutral, because turning back this edit makes me question the true neutrality of Wikipedia. Dooiney (talk) 01:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

I'll list five each. Left-wing: Alternet, BuzzFeed, Huffpost, Mother Jones, Slate. Right-wing: American Spectator, Breitbart, Blaze, Newsmax, OAN. There are others. Once again, it was the school districts, NOT THE GOVERNOR, who closed schools for COVID outbreak reasons longer than three months. Steelbeard1 (talk) 12:41, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

It doesn't matter if Whitmer was the one responsible for those schools being closed into 2022 or not. The fact that she said that they were only closed for three months, which is factually incorrect, shows that she has no problem covering up for and defending those school closures, which we are now seeing the drastic negative impacts those had on children, when it comes to learning loss and test scores, social development, depression, drug use, etc. Dooiney (talk) 14:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

And speaking of bias, let me ask you this. Which of these sources would you consider biased, if any: Detroit Free Press, Detroit News, New York Post, New York Times, and Washington Post? Dooiney (talk) 14:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

The clear answer regarding your new list is the New York Post with an obvious right wing slant. Steelbeard1 (talk) 18:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

That's what I figured you'd say. You are so far to the left yourself, it is so obvious. The New York Times and the Washington Post are further left than the New York Post is to the right. Don't kid yourself, you know it's true. So if anyone posts anything from the New York Post on Wikipedia, it would be considered from a biased source and removed? Dooiney (talk) 18:43, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Regarding the questionable citations I called out, the blog Legal Insurrection gave the headline "Michigan Gov. Whitmer Lies About Closing Schools for Only Three Months Over COVID" when I made it VERY CLEAR that it was the school boards and not the governor who kept the schools closed longer. Note that questionable news stories have a tendency to edit stories to fit their biases and also change the story's context. The Washington Times piece does mention in the body of the text about the school boards closing the schools, but Republican spokespeople in the piece blamed her and NOT the school boards. Steelbeard1 (talk) 18:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Check out this Forbes magazine piece from 2017 regarding reliable news sources. [1] Steelbeard1 (talk) 18:54, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

You dodging me calling you out proves my point even more. I'm done with you. (Redacted). Dooiney (talk) 18:58, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

• The requirement to edit civilly on this collaborative project is not an option. If I'd see your blatant attacks from July I wold have blocked you then.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

"List of Characters and Races of Mario Kart Wii" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect List of Characters and Races of Mario Kart Wii and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 7#List of Characters and Races of Mario Kart Wii until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 17:16, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jeffery Boulevard

The article Jeffery Boulevard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldnt find anything about this besides directions, fails GNG in terms of reliable sources. If you find any reliable sources, please add them

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. `~HelpingWorld~` ^(👽🛸) 21:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC)