Wikipedia

User talk:Disavian/Archive 17

< User talk:Disavian
Latest comment: 11 years ago by The Interior in topic Welcome to the Wikipedia Ambassador Program
Archive 10 ← Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

pi FA

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for offering to help with the pi FA nomination. I'm appreciate the work you did getting the GA status. Please post any suggestions for the article in the FA review page (or even in the pi Talk page, if they are not a formal review) and I'll take care of them. --Noleander (talk) 04:27, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Advice for improving a research institute page?

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Disavian, I noticed your work on Georgia Tech Research Institute and SRI International. I'm looking for some advice/help on improving a research institute page, Digital Enterprise Research Institute where I'm worried about my own WP:COI. I've made only minimal edits to this page in the past, since I currently work there. However, a colleague wants to expand the page and they made some recent edits based on the structure of other articles. I can't tell if this is getting better or worse, though I think that the additional references are useful. What do you think? Any suggestions? Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 09:26, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

I have been editing a lot in this subject area, and if you have a positive change you'd like to make, just be BOLD and make it. Just remember to be mindful of staying neutral and sourcing everything you can; that can be difficult sometimes, and you have to have some language pointed out to you in order to realize that it's not neutral. That's why we have the review processes that we do, I suppose. I do like the structure of the two articles I've primarily worked on, but I've run into the same issue of wondering what material to include. I'm fortunate enough that those two organizations have (relatively) long histories, and several reliable written works that cover each of them. You're welcome to copy that format and contact me for advice on any specifics of doing so, on here or over email if you prefer that. Disavian (talk) 16:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
I went in and made a few changes, such as adding an infobox, which you can fill out with information at your leisure. The sources are nice, but they should really be integrated into the article of the body as inline references. Disavian (talk) 16:58, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the edits and the advice! Much appreciated. It's especially useful to point out what needs sourcing. And I'll try to move some of the "further reading" inline. :) Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 00:00, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of G. Wayne Clough

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article G. Wayne Clough you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:G. Wayne Clough for things which need to be addressed. GoPTCN 19:11, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of G. Wayne Clough

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article G. Wayne Clough you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:G. Wayne Clough for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? GoPTCN 09:31, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Talkback

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 
Hello, Disavian. You have new messages at Rahulmothiya's talk page.
Message added 13:58, 29 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Rahul Mothiya ( Talk ) 13:58, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Great American Wiknic for Atlanta in June

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hi Disavian. I would like to invite you to help plan the Atlanta edition of the Great American Wiknic this June (you could update Wikipedia:Meetup/Atlanta) :) Also, please confirm any preliminary details at Wikipedia:Wiknic#2012 Wiknic.--Pharos (talk) 15:51, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Flying Spaghetti Monster Userbox

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The image used in your Flying Spaghetti Monster Userbox isn't what it used to be. For some reason File:Flying Spaghetti Monster.jpg now redirects to File:Plate of Spaghetti.jpg. While I don't recall what exactly was there, I think replacing it with a more suitable image (File:FlyingSpaghettiMonster.JPG? File:FSM_Logo.svg or File:FSM_Logo_white.svg?) would be a good idea. 786b6364 (talk) 20:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Do whatever you think improves it. :) Disavian (talk) 23:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! I've gone with my first suggestion, seeing as how it's from Touched by His Noodly Appendage. 786b6364 (talk) 00:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

List of SRI International people

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello.

Are you going to head back to WP:FLC to address the remaining comments on the above list or would you prefer to withdraw the nomination at this time? Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:00, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

I've been meaning to take care of the remaining issues, but real life has been rather intrusive on my wiki time. I'd be okay with withdrawing it for now. Disavian (talk) 15:00, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SRI International

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article SRI International you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Viriditas (talk) 08:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

GTRI prose review

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hey mate! In case you hadn't noticed, I've begun reviewing the GTRI article. My comments are listed here. Cheers! --Cryptic C62 · Talk 19:51, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll see if I can get to some of that today. Disavian (talk) 19:57, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Stanford University libraries

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, and thanks for your recent improvements to the "Libraries" section at Stanford University. Big improvement! You also made a proposal to split off the libraries into a separate article. I have started a discussion about that proposal here. --MelanieN (talk) 16:34, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion


Your GA nomination of SRI International

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article SRI International you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:SRI International for things which need to be addressed. Viriditas (talk) 01:19, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll try to get to that sooner rather than later. Disavian (talk) 01:20, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Main page appearance: pi

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is a note to let the main editors of pi know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on July 22, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 22, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

π (or pi) is a mathematical constant that is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. It is approximately equal to 3.14159. π is an irrational number, which means that it cannot be expressed exactly as a ratio of two integers, although it is roughly approximated by 22/7. It is a transcendental number – a number that cannot be produced with a finite sequence of algebraic operations (sums, products, powers, and roots). The transcendence of π implies that it is impossible to solve the ancient challenge of squaring the circle with a compass and ruler. The digits in the decimal representation of π appear to be random. Because its definition relates to the circle, π is found in many formulae in trigonometry and geometry, such as Euler's identity, eiπ + 1 = 0. It is also found in formulae from other branches of science, such as cosmology, number theory, statistics, fractals, thermodynamics, mechanics, and electromagnetism. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SRI International

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article SRI International you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:SRI International for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? Viriditas (talk) 01:29, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Stanford University

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

I got the impression that you intended to split this article. Do you still wish to? if not can we remove the tag? Op47 (talk) 20:36, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I totally forgot about that. Yeah, I still think there needs to be a Stanford University Libraries article. Disavian (talk) 22:29, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
It has been implemented and the tag is gone. Disavian (talk) 08:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Thankyou. Op47 (talk) 11:38, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
And then I added another splitsection tag to the article! Will my evil ever end?!?! :) Disavian (talk) 18:18, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Lane Medical Library

Latest comment: 11 years ago25 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Disavian! I'd like your opinion. I have been thinking about doing an article on Lane Medical Library, the medical library at Stanford. But I'm not sure there's enough material, particularly enough independent material, to pass the notability hurdle. Also, I couldn't find any details about the size of the collection, and very little about the facilities in the library. I have a draft in my sandbox. Could you take a look and let me know if you think it would pass muster, or if it is too short or lacks sufficient Independent Reliable Sources? Thanks! (I've never had an article of mine deleted; don't want to start now!) --MelanieN (talk) 15:05, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

I went and made a few edits, and found you another source. I find that it's helpful to first write the associated biographies; for example, Levi Cooper Lane is definitely notable, and Elias Samuel Cooper probably is as well. Disavian (talk) 18:14, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the improvements, and the reference! Interesting idea about the biographies; I had assumed there would be less material available about the person than about the facility. I'll give that some thought. --MelanieN (talk) 20:26, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Sometimes you find references that way that you might have otherwise missed. And sometimes... well, it turns into James E. Boyd (scientist). Disavian (talk) 20:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Totally unrelated, but if you could spare some meatcycles to improve Arati Prabhakar, I'd appreciate it. Disavian (talk) 20:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
That new reference you found is very detailed (although it does contain a few internal contradictions; they can be resolved by other sources.). I could almost write the bio from it alone. I see what you mean about the Boyd article. (Looks like it got big enough to become a vandal magnet - lucky you!) Arati sounds like an interesting person; I'll take a look if I can ever dig myself out of Stanford messes. (Among other things, I discovered that the Stanford University School of Medicine article hadn't been updated in three years; it kept talking about facilities that "will" open in 2010!) --MelanieN (talk) 20:35, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Glad to help! And any article that goes on the main page gets vandalized, I've had... five so far? I'm used to it by now :) Disavian (talk) 20:39, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Well, sorry to say, my first input on her article will be a debunking. It turns out there are lots of candidates for "first woman to earn a PhD from CalTech." Prabhakar isn't even close. 1984? Not by decades! The actual first seems to have been Dorothy Ann Semenow, 1955, PhD in chemistry & biology [1]. Lorraine Foster was the first woman PhD in math - 1964 [2]. Sorry! I'll see if I can find some positive contributions! --MelanieN (talk) 20:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
I didn't really look closely into that fact. I appreciate you helping :) Disavian (talk) 20:57, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Always the first thing I check. I'm especially skeptical of claims of "summa cum laude", which it seems almost every biography here claims (without any evidence, ever). I especially love it when someone claims "summa cum laude" from Stanford, because Stanford does not award that distinction! --MelanieN (talk) 21:04, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Well, you were right - the biography wrote itself pretty quickly. I'll post it and see what happens. Any improvements appreciated! --MelanieN (talk) 23:19, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, it's a pretty effective method. Are you currently editing it? I don't want to edit conflict with you. Disavian (talk) 00:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
No, go for it. --MelanieN (talk) 01:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Having written a few biographies, there are certain features you add to all of them, such as the persondata template, and you plaster their birth and death dates ALL OVER EVERYTHING. :p Also, I use citation templates quite a lot. Disavian (talk) 01:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Look who I found a picture of! [3] And it's published before 1923, so it's totally public domain. Disavian (talk) 01:47, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Nice find! And you found all kinds of missing details - thanks! I'm not very skilled with things like infoboxes and templates, and I don't know the first thing about pictures (except how to steal them from other articles). Funny, I have seen people go around ripping out the birth and death dates saying "once is enough!" I'm with you, put 'em in there. --MelanieN (talk) 02:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey - un-debunk! Prabhakar does have a claim to being first - the first woman to get a CalTech PhD in applied physics. Sometimes the devil is in the details! I put it in the article --MelanieN (talk) 02:31, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Oh, okay. Did you find a source that I can use for that, other than [8] in the article? Disavian (talk) 02:32, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Yes, the New York Times - the same article that you already had. I already cited it for that fact. Other than that I can't add a thing, you did a very thorough job! --MelanieN (talk) 02:49, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Oh, okay! Thanks. I just got annoyed when I saw this as the article of the head of DARPA, and sort of attribute it to Wikipedia's gender bias. I've made... a couple edits to it since then :) Disavian (talk) 02:57, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
At least there was an article. A stub is better than nothing. Nice job expanding it and giving her her due! Almost expanded enough for a DYK. --MelanieN (talk) 03:17, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
I actually did nominate it for DYK. I use the User:Shubinator/DYKcheck tool to verify if something is eligible for nomination, and I had expanded the article enough. Disavian (talk) 03:37, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Kewl! Just one comment: I don't think most people know what NIST is, especially out of context like that. Do you have room in the hook to spell it out? --MelanieN (talk) 04:17, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
I spelled it out, if a reviewer wants to shorten it they can. :) Disavian (talk) 04:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
If they think it's too long, you might consider dropping "engineer and". It may detract a little from "DARPA director," as if the two titles were comparable. (There are lots of engineers, but there is only one DARPA director.) Listing her PhD makes it clear already that she is a smart and highly educated woman. --MelanieN (talk) 15:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Microsystems Technology Office, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, bot! You're a pal. Disavian (talk) 17:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

  • The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
  • To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
  • If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
  • HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
  • Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
  • When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Arati Prabhakar

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Discussion at "Did you know..?"

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Disavian! Take a look at Template:Did you know nominations/Stanford University Libraries which you wrote and I nominated; there is some discussion about the hook. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 14:10, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

P.S. What happened to two of the pictures in the article??? Bing Wing and Bender Room have gone blank. --MelanieN (talk) 14:25, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
They were apparently deleted from Wikimedia Commons, discussion here: commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ninotwenty11. Disavian (talk) 14:35, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Bummer. Do you want to move one of the other pix into the infobox? --MelanieN (talk) 15:10, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Greetings

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey there. First of all, thanks for your many excellent contributions to Wikipedia! That's awesome you've helped produce so much quality content. I'll be going for my first FA soon with DVT. I'm contacting you because it looks like we'll both be helping out the 90+ students in the GT Introductory Neuroscience class. I'll email you. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 16:40, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to the Wikipedia Ambassador Program

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hi Disavian!

Congratulations! Your application to join the Wikipedia Education Program as an Online Ambassador has been accepted. We are honored to welcome you the Ambassador team.

The information below is provided to ensure that your new role as an Online Ambassador is a successful one. There are tasks listed, as well as reading material. Please make sure to complete the actions presented below, as quickly as possible.

The Wikipedia Education Program is a relatively new program that is continuing to experience change and transition. Our goal is to be better than we were yesterday. For this reason, please remember to check the information and talk pages of the United States Education Program and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program often. If you have any questions, please contact myself or one of your fellow Ambassadors.

Please complete the following, as soon as possible
  1. Add your username to the official list of Online Ambassadors;
  2. Add a profile for yourself here; and
  3. Read and review the Wikipedia Ambassadors Principles;
  4. Read the United States Education Program's Memorandum of Understanding (provides list of current courses); and
  5. Choose courses from the active lists (United States, Canada) and add yourself to the template and course page of the course you wish to assist.
  6. Sign up for the Wikipedia Ambassador Program announcements email list.

Support Structure

Online Ambassadors serve as a vital link in the Wikipedia Education Program, assisting new student editors transition into the Wikipedia editing community. They serve in a leadership role alongside the course instructor; local Campus Ambassador(s), who work with the class in person; and the Regional Ambassador, who checks in periodically with the pod to make sure everything is going well. Together, the instructor, Campus Ambassador, Regional Ambassador, and Online Ambassador encompass the course "pod".

The pod is the term we use to refer to the group of individuals that work together to help the students in a particular course successfully contribute to Wikipedia. A prototypical pod might look something like this:

  • A professor or course instructor who is fairly new to Wikipedia, leading a class of 20–30 students, who have been assigned to make significant contributions to new or existing articles related to the course subject.
  • Two Campus Ambassadors, one of whom is an experienced Wikipedian and one of whom is new to the encyclopedia. The Campus Ambassadors are provided with training to learn the basic policies and guidelines of Wikipedia and how to help students contribute effectively.
  • Two Online Ambassadors, one of whom is a moderately experienced Wikipedian, while the other is very experienced. Both have knowledge of community policies and guidelines and are available to provide editing guidance, answer questions, and assistance navigating the community. When needed, Online Ambassadors are also available for one-on-one mentorship.
  • One Regional Ambassador, a moderately experienced Wikipedian who coordinates assistance and support for universities and courses based on a large geographical region.

Role and Responsibilities

The list of the responsibilities of the Online Ambassador are presented in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). In essence, the role of the Online Ambassador includes:

  1. Helping students in your class(es) when they ask for it and answer their questions;
  2. Serve as a liaison between the professor/student and the community;
  3. In general, keep an eye out for the students and professors and help them navigate the community;
  4. Helping students get feedback on their work (whether from you or other editors with an interest in or knowledge of the subject area)
  5. Be a good example for students, modeling good faith communication and editing practices; and
  6. Communicating regularly with the other members of your pod regarding the progress of the student, along with any issues that come up.

Online Ambassadors can also assist students that are outside of their pod. Generally, Online Ambassadors represent the Ambassador Program and provide assistance for students whenever encountered. While feedback on the style and formatting of student articles is essential, assistance may also be needed to review the articles substance and content. When needed, the Online Ambassador may request the assistance of WikiProjects that focus on technical issues presented in student articles.

Communication Channels

There are five main places for news, updates, and discussion about Wikipedia Ambassadors and the Wikipedia Education Program:

  1. Wikipedia talk:Ambassadors
  2. Wikipedia talk:United States Education Program
  3. Wikipedia:Education noticeboard
  4. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program announcements list. This is a low-traffic email list that is used for significant announcements that are relevant to the whole program. Please sign up as soon as you get a chance.
  5. Internet Relay Chat (IRC). If you use IRC, please consider adding #wikipedia-en-ambassadors and #wikipedia-en-classroom to your channel lineup. The latter is the main help channel for the program, where students and instructors seek live help.

Future communication tools are being developed. Newsletters about the program or messages for Online Ambassadors may occasionally be delivered to your talk page. If you have any questions, please let me know.

Again, welcome to the Ambassador team! We look forward to working with you. The Interior (Talk) 04:36, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Disavian/Archive_17&oldid=1190142060"