Welcome!

edit

Hello, Dinesh5070, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 19:10, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Zero (2018 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diff: [1] Please provide a reference indicating that this person received a "starring" credit. "Starring" is not interchangeable with "appearing in". Also, please don't use inaccurate edit summaries. You marked your edit as "minor spelling changes" when that is clearly not what you did. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:30, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced changes and conflict of interest

edit

Hi there, re: these changes, a Google search for "Dinesh Malakar" and "Bank Chor" yields zero results. Even the IMDB page for the film doesn't list this person, which makes me question why you are adding the name, especially when you place it in the #6 spot, as though this was a prominent cast member/role.

It seems to me that you might be here to promote yourself, as I also notice that you're working on an article about Dinesh Malakar in your sandbox. You should be advised that if this is you, you have a conflict of interest and you should not be writing about yourself here. Note also that Wikipedia is not a social media platform or a vanity website. You must be sure that subjects you write about meet our General Notability Guideline, and in the case of actors, our more specific notability guidelines for actors. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:46, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dinesh5070 (August 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 08:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Dinesh5070! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 08:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Jklamo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tata Group have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Jklamo (talk) 17:45, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Marketing strategy. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [2] MrOllie (talk) 13:32, 29 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Daily fantasy sports, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 18:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tata Consultancy Services. -- DaxServer (talk) 07:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 2021

edit

  This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Typing, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Back from your block and right back to spamming the same article Meters (talk) 06:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page.

Kuru (talk) 14:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply