Welcome!

Hello, Digifiend, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- 9cds(talk) 09:09, 5 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks 9cds, mostly I've done minor updates, but I have created one stub article - Big Fat Joe - I don't want to be accused of vandalism, so I'm playing it safe! Still this site is fantastic, I like the fact anyone can edit, that's why I joined. One thing though, your user page says its been vandalised three times - maybe they should ban editing on user pages unless you're logged in as that user. Digifiend 09:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ah, it's not much of a problem :) -- 9cds(talk) 09:39, 5 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

RE: Sonic Adventure edit

It wasnt confirmed, it doesnt matter how close the gameplay is, it wasnt confirmed. - Luigi128

Helpful Henry edit

Thanks for your comments. Helpful Henry was certainly in the first issue of the Beano (July 30th, 1938) and also featured in the first Beano Book (1940).

To be honest, I don't know if his Dandy Monster Comic appearance was a one-off, or if he actually started out as a Dandy character but was transferred over to the Beano for the launch issue (by which time, the art for the 1939 Monster Comic would already have been prepared). AdorableRuffian 19:09, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fred's Bed edit

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Fred's Bed, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. greenrd 21:43, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Apprentice (UK) edit

  Hello, Digifiend and thank you for your contributions on articles related to The Apprentice UK. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject The Apprentice UK, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of The Apprentice UK and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us here for more information. Thanks! Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK Series Three)'s Peer Review-Review now please! 15:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)Reply


Notability of Trevor Metcalfe edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Trevor Metcalfe, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Trevor Metcalfe seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Trevor Metcalfe, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 23:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

to you edit

  The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
For working to greatly improve comic related articles, I award you this barnstar! Spiby 18:26, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

May 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Midnight (Doctor Who), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TreasuryTagtc 14:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

The date I used was exactly 7 days after the previous episode, there's no way that was wrong. If any more get postponed this year, they should've started the series a month earlier, and I'll be complaining to the BBC. And why is the title of this message "May 2008"? That's not what I added. Digifiend (talk) 08:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as [[Talk:Last of the Time Lords]] are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. ╟─TreasuryTag (talk contribs)─╢ 09:40, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I hope you also told that to the person whose comment (about the Medusa Cascade) I replied to! Anyway, point noted. Digifiend (talk) 09:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last of the Time Lords edit

Hi Digifiend. This news article seems to relate to the importance of Image:Last of the Time Lords.jpg now up for deletion. Perhaps you can use the information in the Last of the Time Lords article to clarify things. JohnABerring27A (talk) 19:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, that's not a citable source, it's a personal webpage, not a news article. Digifiend (talk) 08:46, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re:- Insider? edit

I have my sources ;-) ╟─TreasuryTag (talk contribs)─╢ 07:38, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The TV Lounge edit

Hi Digifiend as you know about a year ago The TV Lounge went down after the domain expired however a new forum has been set up by "Daniel89" called "The TV Shelter". Here is the link:

http://shelter.taskerlands.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.108.145.78 (talk) 10:15, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the link. Digifiend (talk) 12:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

No problem by the way if you are signing up it would have to be approved by "Daniel89" as we've had troll problems recently. By the way this is "garethwilliams".

Tsk. Can't. I'm using a shared computer and the firewall blocks it - usenet news apparently. Oh well. *sighs* Digifiend (talk) 07:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Thief! edit

What the heck are you on about? How is it stealing? All I did was add a comment to it and that's it. Jammy (talk) 19:47, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok I see your point, someone removed your comment and I had the same knowledge as you and so happened to say something similar. Not my fault that someone else removed your comment which I think was bizarre considering yours was worth contributing to the conversation. Jammy (talk) 19:52, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I checked the history - you're the one who changed it. You can't cover your tracks at Wikipedia, didn't you notice the "history" tab at the top of the page? Digifiend (talk) 11:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Laura Howell edit

 

A tag has been placed on Laura Howell, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Laura Howell and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:41, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, can't see how it differs from a lot of other Beano/Dandy artist stubs, although I admit my info did come from her own website. I was just trying to eliminate a red link. And being the first and only female Beano artist makes her notable in my book. Digifiend (talk) 12:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Talk page comments edit

Please check the dates at the end of other users' comments before you add to the conversation. Of all of your comments at Talk:Power Rangers: RPM, all of the threads have been resolved and no comments added for at least a month.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Observer edit

Hi, you dropped a couple of supplements [1] as discontinued; do you have a source? It would be best to provide a source in the article and say they've been dropped. Rd232 talk 11:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately my source was a thread on the Digital Spy forums, which I understand is an unacceptable source under Wikipedia's rules. The poster I found out from probably just noticed they were missing from the paper, he said they'd been missing for a few weeks. Digifiend (talk) 12:14, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Duncan Scott edit

Hi Digifiend. I notice that with this edit you requested a removal of the redirect (what you called "autoforward") to Duncan Campbell Scott. Are you still interested in this Duncan Scott? Enough to write an article? Because if you do, i believe that it can be put in place of the redirect very easily. Talk to me, if you're interested & would like some help.... Cheers, LindsayHi 20:07, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Big Fat Joe edit

 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Big Fat Joe. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Fat Joe. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Talk pages edit

Please check the dates on conversations on talk pages, as you recently contributed to one that had ended over a year ago.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:53, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Layout fixed" edit

The following edits actually broke the page: [2] [3] [4].—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:57, 15 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Eh? But I've got a large bar with just a number in, then a cell so small the episode title goes onto three lines. After my edit, it fitted on one line. Does it display differently in different browsers maybe? Digifiend (talk) 01:45, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Arthur Darvill edit

Hello Digifiend, I wondered if you'd read this? It fills in some detail about why using YouTube links is generally frowned on in references. Alistair Stevenson (talk) 18:52, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

List of The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episodes edit

Please weigh in on Talk:List of The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episodes#Inclusion of episode segment links, so we can generate a consensus. Thanks, Fixblor (talk) 09:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Goukaiger edit

There is a very simple reason why the name "Goukaiger" was not listed on any item relating to Super Sentai when I first discovered it this morning. It is because it is not actually confirmed. This image that you posted? We have no idea where it actually comes from. It is not from any particular magazine like Terebikun or Terebi Magazine. It probably comes from some industry press release that the general public never gets access to. Because of this, this particular image is not a reliable source. As such, we cannot use that particular item to support the fact that the show 海賊戦隊ゴーカイジャー exists.

However, the Industrial Property Digital Library has had entries for 海賊戦隊ゴーカイジャー since August, and now references pointing to those items are on the article and that supports the fact that 海賊戦隊ゴーカイジャー exists.

Onto my next note: "Goukaiger" is most certainly not confirmed as the name of the series. At this stage, we have no way of knowing how TV Asahi, Toei, and Bandai will be Anglicizing "ゴーカイジャー". For one thing, it does not have a "U" sound in the name. It is just a lengthened O sound that does not result from an OU sound. The show could be "Go-kaiger" (like "Go-onger") or "Gokaiger" or anything else. For that reason, we at Wikipedia should not use the name that the fandom uses because they do not know how to properly read Japanese and simply turns any long O sound into an "OU".—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:59, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of British International Comics Show edit

 

The article British International Comics Show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article gives no indication of notability, and even notes that the event is no longer ongoing.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 23:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

non-free media overuse edit

Yes, even leaving one image could be overuse. Please have a look at the WP:NFCC policy, WP:NFLISTS, and WP:OVERUSE for more information. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:44, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

The current rationale is "The image is used to identify the organization Night_Network, a subject of public interest. The significance of the logo is to help the reader identify the organization, assure the readers that they have reached the right article containing critical commentary about the organization, and illustrate the organization's intended branding message in a way that words alone could not convey."

No, the image is not used to identify the organisation, it is purely to 'illustrate the organization's intended branding message' - so it does not serve an identification purpose, and it not an image which is critically described. Sorry, this one still fails WP:NFCC. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:53, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Go-Busters edit

The scan that is going around the internet is not a reliable source. It is a photograph taken from the pages of a proprietary trade catalog and not a magazine that is available to the public. So we will not mention the title "Gobusters", "Go Busters", or "Go-Busters" until we have a freely available reliable source (one of the children's or hobby magazines) that features the title logo.

And either way, the one from the trade catalog is such a low resolution photo that we cannot feasibly tell what the hell the logo says anyway.—Ryulong (竜龙) 01:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

You can on this one. It's bigger, and you clearly see the word GO-BUSTERS in the logo. It's confirmed. [5] Digifiend (talk) 17:11, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
I still don't see a dash between "Go" and "Busters". Again, this can wait till we get higher res things. But even then, it is not confirmed enough for Wikipedia standards.—Ryulong (竜龙) 18:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Will you stop complaining about this? I have told you that we cannot use the image that you have provided me because it does not pass WP:RS because it is not a publication that is available to the general public. It is from a trade catalog that only shows up at the Japan toy shows that are not open to the general public. And I am actually not even 100% clear as to whether or not that is an accurate description of the scans like that one or this one or this one. The fact that we cannot even begin to name the publication means it will never be a reliable source. It's a nice image for the fandom to figuratively masturbate over, but it does not qualify for useful content on the English Wikipedia.—Ryulong (竜龙) 10:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KClogo2010.gif edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:KClogo2010.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:24, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think it's fair use to use that logo, as it illustrates their brand, and there's no free alternative. Please don't delete. And I've put it back into the KCom article. Digifiend (talk) 21:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Brittany Anne Pirtle edit

You are welcome. --Chiya92 12:34, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined: File:TV Land 2012.jpeg edit

Hello Digifiend. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:TV Land 2012.jpeg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 16:13, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Megaforce edit

Don't make a Megaforce page unless you can find a reliable source (that is nothing that can be linked directly to the fandom, e.g. do not fucking use Samurai Cast) that states any of the information recently revealed at the panel at Power Morphicon 3. Remember that Wikipedia has stricter standards than the fandom, and we should not report on anything that does not have reliable sources because the page could very well be deleted and then we have to cut through a lot of red tape to get a proper page set up.—Ryulong (琉竜) 20:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Fansites are not reliable sources, no matter if they reported on an actual event and may be 100% right. When a press release comes out with that same information, we can start building up a Megaforce page. Until then, and regardless as to how other articles may have started out on Wikipedia, there cannot be a standalone Power Rangers Megaforce article on Wikipedia. If you make one using the pisspoor sources that are out there as of the time that I am writing this, I will send it to WP:AFD and have it officially deleted.—Ryulong (琉竜) 02:53, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Instead of discussing this on 4 different talk pages, I think we should all discuss this in the discussion that was started at WP:Notability/Noticeboard#Power Rangers Megaforce back in June. Powergate92Talk 06:33, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Samurai Cast is a fan blog and it is not a reliable source. There are zero reliable sources out there for any of the other 4 cast members. Do not put them on the article. And even if there are photos of four other people in costume, we do not have any reliable sources for their names. Either way, you completely botched up the source formatting. You cannot have four citations all to the same website. There is a way to make it so you don't have to link it 4 times in a row but why bother because we're not going to use Samurai Cast.

Long story short, no information from Samurai Cast or any other fandom website ever.—Ryulong (琉竜) 00:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 22 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kix! (TV channel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Legend of the Dragon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wizard cast order edit

I know it's not you fault, but you should really double check before you go about changing the order of the names. Several days ago an IP editor switched the English order around to be wrong, and your edit made everything worse by association.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

George Entwistle edit

Hello. Glad to see an update on this page. I had put together a section under the heading "controversy" which covered the background of the Savile and Newsnight crises this morning 12:18, 10 November 2012‎ . This was wrongly removed in its entirety by Widefox who substituted an inaccurate and libellous paragraph implicating Lord McAlpine and making partisan and incorrect references to "Tories" "Thatcher" etc - none of which are relevant or germane to the story. Widefox's conduct is unworthy of a Wikipedia editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newsnet (talkcontribs)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Kamen Rider Wizard characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phoenix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 11 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined: File:KoperCapodistria.jpg edit

Hello Digifiend. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:KoperCapodistria.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:59, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

DharakJoo edit

I'm just as frustrated with DharakJoo as you are, but I'm more pissed with the Wiki higher-ups for not blocking him and his sockpuppets. When I flagged him as a sockpuppet, the admins dismissed the case on the grounds that the second account was created because he probably forgot his password.

However, I may have scared him off for good, as one of his anonymous IP addresses hasn't made an edit since he apologized to me on 15 January. - Areaseven (talk) 15:22, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Do you want to go report DharakJoo and Leokimdon for sockpuppetry? - Areaseven (talk) 16:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please add your comments on this page. - Areaseven (talk) 15:32, 25 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bad news: Despite using Leokimdon's edit on your Talk page as evidence, the higher-ups dismissed DharakJoo's second sockpuppet case. Nevertheless, neither account has moved since that investigation. - Areaseven (talk) 17:28, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

RangerWiki edit

Don't say that to him. He just editing good stuff. So please, apologize to Samueljoo. --DharakJoo (talk) 00:10, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Don't say that to ME you mean, sockpuppet! And I don't know what you're talking about. You should be blocked. Permanently. I'm watching you. Digifiend (talk) 01:45, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

You're really screwing things up by allowing all of the fandom confirmed episodes to be on the Power Ranger Wikia because now we have some shitty banned user here screwing everything up and using that site as proof.—Ryulong (琉竜) 17:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I hope you told them about WP:SPS. Wikipedia has a rule that other wikis shouldn't be cited, right? Digifiend (talk) 23:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Toei and other companies release their episode guides monthly. Since those are in Japanese, we can really only go to other blogs to get proper translations. The episode guides do count as sources.Gaeaman787 (talk) 00:19, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
They shouldn't be citing RangerWiki though. I've just added a notice on RangerWiki's forum and Style Guide saying this. They should be citing whatever source we got it from. Unfortunately, the translations still fall foul of WP:BLOGS. Digifiend (talk) 00:27, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Gaeaman, this is concerning the full list of Megaforce episodes that has been circulating around the fandom since February. And we don't use any blogs to translate the titles of episodes for Super Sentai. We do it ourselves.—Ryulong (琉竜) 10:35, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Saban themselves probably released it on Rangerboard. That's my only guess. And why are we still dealing with DharakJoo, he hasn't edited since like, January.Gaeaman787 (talk) 18:00, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Kyl posted them on Funaroboard and it got to the other forums from there. I sent him a message asking what his source is. I would imagine it would be either Nickelodeon or Saban themselves. Digifiend (talk) 21:14, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 21 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American and British English spelling differences, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Recognise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 12 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ERT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dino Charge edit

Question, what should be done with the announcement of Dino Charge for 2015. I added a placeholder spot in the PR menu box for it, but I'm guessing there won't be a article for it until later this year. So I was asking at what point do we create a article for Dino Charge?Gaeaman787 (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'll answer this. An article is created when there is enough information that can be verified such that it can pass Wikipedia's notability guidelines. And it does not need to be in the navbox because there's nothing to navigate to, and it's not like other areas on this site where things are normally put in navboxes despite there being no article for the topic yet.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 08:58, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Since it was announced in a USA Today article and then confirmed by Saban themselves on the Power Rangers Facebook page, we do at least know the show exists, and I see USA Today has been cited on the main Power Rangers article. A separate article for the season would just be a stub though, there's nothing we can add that's not on the franchise page, except for the season logo. Can't even say it's based on Kyoryuger (even though that's blatantly obvious), as that would be original research. Digifiend (talk) 13:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but mere existence does not denote notability. And for all we know they'll use the Go-Busters crap for season 1 and Kyoryuger for a "Super Dino Charge" season 2.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 13:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Well, that's now confirmed to not be the case. This shows the Kyoryuger - though it's still WP:OR and therefore unciteable. Digifiend (talk) 17:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2009 in American television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC Kids (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 14 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Mop Girl edit

As per your Pages needing translating posting regarding Mop Girl#Episodes Ratings I complemented the Japanese titles in the table with English transcription and translation, in case you personally were interested in this information.--Kiyoweap (talk) 03:35, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Power Rangers Dino Charge edit

OK. I reduced it to semi. If it gets reverted start a discussion and don't edit war. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:15, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Given the article's past history I hope the article will stay and can be built without the controversy it caused over recent months. I tried to link this from a episode list but because I just started editing the attempt failed. Slimer5Buster (talk) 12:09, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Someone also has to un-blacklist the episode list. I created an alternate title (List of Power Rangers Dino Charge episodes), but it should be moved. Slimer5Buster (talk)

Digimon Wiki edit

Are you still interested in editing there?192.249.47.186 (talk) 23:21, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KClogo2010.gif edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:KClogo2010.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Remove the ones in two pages on Beano-pedia edit

Do you want to remove "*It is unknown why this is on Beano-pedia since this has nothing to do with the Beano and neither does Curious George." and the Candidates for deletion category in The City and " (also known as Class 2B)", " of Class 2B" and the Candidates for deletion category in Bash Street School on Beano-pedia? 67.218.18.234 (talk) 22:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikia edit

How are the Wikia requests going? You are no longer labelled as globally blocked on Wikia. -- AxG /  / 10 years of editing 22:22, 30 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, got an email at 10.40pm telling me I was unblocked. They investigated and must've concluded that a) it was out of character and b) the IP address I was logged in from usually did not match up to the one the vandal was on. Digifiend (talk) 00:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Revert an edit by 107.5.141.18 on Roller Monkey Transcript on Beano-pedia edit

Can you revert an edit by 107.5.141.18 to the last version by 65.183.252.2 and remove the Candidates for deletion category on Roller Monkey Transcript? 67.218.18.234 (talk) 13:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Revert an edit by 107.5.141.18 on Curious George, Door Monkey Transcript on Beano-pedia edit

Can you revert an edit by 107.5.141.18 to the last version by 65.183.252.2 and remove the Candidates for deletion category on Curious George, Door Monkey Transcript? 67.218.18.234 (talk) 23:44, 7 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KClogo2010.gif edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:KClogo2010.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Merger discussion for Sports Direct edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing—Sports Direct—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. zazpot (talk) 22:29, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Digifiend. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Blocking YukiNagatoIsGorgeous on Beano-pedia edit

Another user called YukiNagatoIsGorgeous has vandalized the place a lot on Beano-pedia, could you revert edits by her before you block her please?

The Beano

Mrs. Dulson

Snow Use

Curious George Visits a Police Station Transcript

Beano-pedia

Bash Street School

Dennis the Menace 67.218.18.234 (talk) 12:51, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Anon, I don't have the power to block, I'm not an admin on that wiki. In fact I don't think it has any active admins. I suggest you instead report it to VSTF. Digifiend (talk) 16:54, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Facebook as a source edit

I would like to point out that I was not necessarily disputing the accuracy of the social media reports about Leo Baxendale's death, but I was disputing the reliability of the sources. Facebook and Twitter are generally not considered reliable sources. See WP:BLPSPS. Ollie231213 (talk) 11:34, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Question about "Y" (as consonant) edit

Hello Digifiend and sorry to disturb you here "at home". I just happened to notice you, at the talk-page Talk:Y of the Y -article. And as I see you are native in British English - and also since things appear to go extremely slow at that particular talk-page, do I wonder if you possibly could help me with a language question. - Is there (in your opinion) a notable difference in how a "J" and a "Y" actually are pronounced in the cases of "yet" and "jet". ("Haven't seen her here yet" / "A huge jet engine") I'm not after prooving any point - but am curious and would very much appreciate any answer. If this was dull, just ignore it. Cheers ! Boeing720 (talk) 01:55, 11 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Digifiend. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

CappottoTehObjectXD on Beano-pedia edit

We've got another problem. CappottoTehObjectXD is vandalizing the place a lot on Beano-pedia. 209.133.221.254 (talk) 13:45, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

And you're telling me this why? I'm not an admin there. Digifiend (talk) 07:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Could you mark these pages CappottoTehObjectXD made for deletion?
Cappotto's World
Spring Time!
The Vacation
One Of Genderman
Night Living of Stars
The Name Of Prot
The Name Of Prot Transcript
Sunyin and Spriyang
Rusced Ovening
Still Crave
New Friends
Expansion Slime
Expansion Slime Transcript 209.133.221.254 (talk) 16:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Removing the Candidates for deletion category in the pages on Beano-pedia edit

Can you remove the Candidates for deletion category in these pages on Beano-pedia?

Bea

Bertie

Curly

Danny

Dennis the Menace

Erbert

Fatty

George

Gnasher

Gnipper

Ma Bear

Minnie the Minx

Mr. Dulson

Pa

Pie-Face

Plug

Sidney

Smiffy

Spotty (Softie)

Ted

The Bash Street Kids

Toots

Walter The Softy

Wilfred 209.133.221.254 (talk) 18:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Didn't you read my reply last time, I'm not an admin there! Digifiend (talk) 14:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Could you please remove the Candidates for deletion category in Wilbur Brown's page on Beano-pedia? 209.133.221.254 (talk) 19:34, 31 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Beano television show doesn't exist edit

Hi, I was dropping in to remove the discussion on Pamelyn Ferdin's talk page. Can you mark some of the episodes, transcripts and complete seasons that don't exist for deletion on Beano-pedia? 209.133.221.254 (talk) 11:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Digifiend. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Digifiend. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bury FC edit

Totally Agree - Good job - Cameron Scott (talk) 18:34, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Diamond Comic Distributors & SARS-2 effects edit

Moved this to Timeline of the 2020 coronavirus pandemic in the United States#March 23. X1\ (talk) 02:49, 27 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Removing pointless talk pages edit

Sorry about that, could you remove these pointless talk pages in here?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Digifiend#Remove_the_ones_in_two_pages_on_Beano-pedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Digifiend#Revert_an_edit_by_107.5.141.18_on_Roller_Monkey_Transcript_on_Beano-pedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Digifiend#Revert_an_edit_by_107.5.141.18_on_Curious_George%2C_Door_Monkey_Transcript_on_Beano-pedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Digifiend#Blocking_YukiNagatoIsGorgeous_on_Beano-pedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Digifiend#CappottoTehObjectXD_on_Beano-pedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Digifiend#Removing_the_Candidates_for_deletion_category_in_the_pages_on_Beano-pedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Digifiend#The_Beano_television_show_doesn't_exist — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.38.88.127 (talk) 15:29, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nicky Nutjob edit

 

The article Nicky Nutjob has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 00:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Marking pages for deletion on Beanopedia edit

Could you please mark some of these pages for deletion on Beanopedia?

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/User:92.15.8.45

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Bash_Street_Kids_in_Who_Stolds_the_Class

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Bertie?redirect=no

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Bill_Farmer

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Billy_West

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Businessman

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Talk:Curious_George_(film)

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Cuthbert%27s_dad?redirect=no

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Gloria_Camacho

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Gnasher_and_Gnipper%27?redirect=no

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Ivy_the_Terrible_on_Safari_Transcript?redirect=no

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Jack_Duffy

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/John_Matthews

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Massive_Minnie_Minxs?redirect=no

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Meebo_and_zuky?redirect=no

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Minnie%27s_Dad?redirect=no

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Minnie%27s_Mum?redirect=no

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Minnie_the_Minx_-_Minnie_Chairs_Transcript

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Minnie_the_Minx_-_Minnie_Clones_Transcript?redirect=no

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Mrs._Greature?redirect=no

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Pamelyn_Ferdin

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Poo_Poo?redirect=no

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Season_1_Episodes

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Season_2_Episodes

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Season_3_Episodes

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Season_4_Episodes

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Season_5_Episodes

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Season_6_Episodes

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Season_7_Episodes

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Season_8_Episodes

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Squirrel_for_a_Day?redirect=no

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/The_Competition?redirect=no

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/The_Three_Bears_-_Bed

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/The_Three_Bears_-_Chair

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/The_Trail_Transcript?redirect=no

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Tony_Fraizer?redirect=no

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Tony_Frazier

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Transcripts

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Yellow_Hat

https://beano.fandom.com/wiki/Young_Boy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.218.18.234 (talk) 00:12, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ant & Dec's Limitless Win (March 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DarkGlow was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DarkGlow • 20:40, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Digifiend! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – DarkGlow • 20:40, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Movie Channel (British TV channel) edit

 

The article The Movie Channel (British TV channel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable. I googled it, and found no reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avishai11 (talk) 20:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Movie Channel (British TV channel) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Movie Channel (British TV channel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Movie Channel (British TV channel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Avishai11 (talk) 20:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply