DietCokeFeast

Welcome!

Hello, DietCokeFeast! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 01:34, 7 December 2019 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

July 2020

Hi DietCokeFeast! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Stimulant use disorder that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Greyjoy ^talk 06:46, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Wikiproject

Hello DietCokeFeast: Thank you for your contributions to veganism – or vegetarianism – related articles. I'd like to invite you to join WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a WikiProject to improve veganism and vegetarianism articles on Wikipedia and coverage of these topics. If you would like to participate or join, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! Psychologist Guy (talk) 20:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Edits

Hi DietCokeFeast​,

Your recent edits on pollotarianism, white meat, Semi-vegetarianism, vegetarianism are quite problematic. Content sourced to blogs, small sample studies, single cohorts, opinion pieces etc which are primary sources. WP:MEDRS applies for WP:Biomedical content, so primary sources are not generally reliable. Some of the content you added also looks like original research but this is not allowed on Wikipedia, see WP:OR. Your edit here is very problematic [1] it contains original research, indeed none of the sources you added mention the pollotarianism. You may want to read up on the Wikipedia policies in regard to health content. I noticed you have been adding health claims content to articles for about a year but you have added small sample studies (primary) and single cohort studies in various places, these are not considered reliable on Wikipedia in regard to biomedical content in relation to health matters. It's more reliable if you find a recent systematic review. Some of your edits have been very good but this is totally unacceptable because you are linking to primary and unreliable sources like the Sun Newspaper [2] Psychologist Guy (talk) 22:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Agree. While the effort seems sincere and wide-ranging, there is substantial verbose writing and inattention to concise, correct content, exemplified in this reverted text. DCF needs to slow down, read and apply solid MEDRS sources (no blogs or popular media), and pay closer attention to succinct, grammatically-correct English composition. Zefr (talk) 23:17, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

I also agree. I cleaned up the white meat page a few days ago, and I was going to ask if DietCokeFeast​ should be approached about his/their edits because he (?) is just going to keep editing like that. ApproximateLand (talk) 08:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

I can help you with sourcing, DietCokeFeast​. Please don't use very old refs. ApproximateLand (talk) 08:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@ApproximateLand:, @Zefr: - DietCokeFeast added original research to the monotrophic diet again. I am concerned this type of editing is having a negative effect on this website in regard to nutritional content. DietCoke linked to a study on the monotrophic diet which does not mention the carnivore diet and this seems to have attracted attention from a new user. DietCoke does not respond so I think this user should be reported to the admin board if this behavior continues. I want to assume good faith because English might not be their first language and they do add some good content but they are making too many mistakes in their edits. We shouldn't have to clean up after them. Psychologist Guy (talk) 20:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Monotrophic diet. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. You are putting nonsense from spam sources into the encyclopedia. Stick to WP:MEDRS. Zefr (talk) 02:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:AdvancedSunscreenProducts.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:AdvancedSunscreenProducts.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:AdvancedSunscreenProducts.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:AdvancedSunscreenProducts.jpeg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Salavat (talk) 14:49, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Thank you for contributing to the article List of pescetarians. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you.

See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 262#Dexerto. FDW777 (talk) 17:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 07:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 07:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Statements that others may rely on for medical information MUST be supported by citation

Hi DietCokeFeast, I'm John Maynard Friedman. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to one or more articles such as Handwriting without citing a reliable source. Please note that all content and edits on Wikipedia are expected to be verifiable in reliable sources. In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and in your edit you did not include any references that meet that ideal. Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. John Maynard Friedman (talk) 10:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

If you cannot find the supporting evidence in the next 24 hours, please delete your addition until you can. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 10:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Sock-puppet investigation

Please see [3] Psychologist Guy (talk) 02:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Logged-out editing

Hi DietCokeFeast. I'm Blablubbs, and I'm an administrator and SPI clerk here on Wikipedia. Per the sockpuppet investigation linked by Psychologist Guy above, it appears that you have been editing the same pages both logged in and logged out, which is prohibited by Wikipedia's policy on sockpuppetry because splitting contributions can create an illusion of support and makes it harder to evaluate an individual's behaviour. Since this has been a long-term issue, I have blocked your IP address for six months to prevent it from happening again. You will still be able to edit while logged in. Please familiarise yourself with the appropriate and inappropriate uses of multiple accounts and/or IP addresses I linked above. Please consider this a stern warning: If issues like this persist, your main account will likely to also be sanctioned. --Blablubbs (talk) 10:12, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

You are risking a block

Hello DietCokeFeast. Please see WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#DietCokeFeast long-term disruption on Pescetarianism. You can respond there if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

The ANI report has been archived to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1101#DietCokeFeast long-term disruption on Pescetarianism. I notice that you continue to revert at Pescetarianism without ever using the talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 18:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

EdJohnston, I didn't know the user had a history of doing it, but I see now they have a pretty substantial track record. Perhaps we need to consider partial blocks? Drmies (talk) 00:47, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Pescetarianism) for ongoing edit warring, refusal to communicate.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 00:49, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Original research

You have been told this many times already, we can't add original research to articles. This edit [4] "this certification can also be attractive to pescetarians because all Kosher-Pareve foods are permissible for them" is not supported by the sourcing. There are 5 sources (I have gone through each), none mention "pescetarians" or anything to do with pescetarianism so what you are adding is original research and against Wikipedia policy. Please read WP:OR. Psychologist Guy (talk) 11:52, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)