October 2014 edit

  Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. C759 (talk) 13:14, 7 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at IPhone 6. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Final warning for repeated refspamming of links to a technology blog. Thomas.W talk 13:52, 7 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Tech Portal (December 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Avono was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Avono (talk) 23:15, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Deep2701, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Avono (talk) 23:15, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: The Tech Portal (March 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CookieMonster755 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CookieMonster755 (talk) 17:57, 29 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Draft:The Tech Portal concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Tech Portal, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Tech Portal (April 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yashovardhan Dhanania was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Yashovardhan (talk) 18:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Email edit

Deep2701 – I see you tried to send me an email, but I never received that in my inbox, please try emailing me again at detente@journalist.com or you can leave a message on my talk page. Cheers, CookieMonster755 𝚨-𝛀 16:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:The Tech Portal has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Tech Portal. Thanks! —Anne Delong (talk) 09:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Tech Portal (June 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
» Shadowowl | talk 09:44, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:The Tech Portal concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Tech Portal, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The Tech Portal edit

 

Hello, Deep2701. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Tech Portal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Abelmoschus Esculentus 12:06, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2021 edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 12:15, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blue Box Media Pvt Ltd moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Blue Box Media Pvt Ltd, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 11:04, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Astraverse for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Astraverse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astraverse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ab207 (talk) 20:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Blue Box Media Pvt Ltd edit

  Hello, Deep2701. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blue Box Media Pvt Ltd, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Blue Box Media Pvt Ltd edit

 

Hello, Deep2701. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Blue Box Media Pvt Ltd".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:08, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply