Hi to Dbaidoo

Sockpuppet investigation edit

 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omorodion1, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

--Stay safe, PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•AC) This message was left at 17:47, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


This is unrelated because I am using only one account on Wikipedia. I am have created another account due to the IP error message I received when I created the first account. The error message prevented me from logging to the AfLIA dashboard, which forced me to try creating another account. Wikipedia can delete the other account if it is on their system because I am not using it. I had not logged on to it since, and I cannot use two accounts for the same purpose. A new user error of this nature usually happens but that does not mean that the user is using both accounts. I know that could not be possible, but if that could be possible, in my case, I am using only one account. Besides, I cannot remember any other password to any other account on Wikipedia apart from the account I am using presently.Dbaidoo (talk) 04:27, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Hi, Dbaidoo. Please disregard the message above, which misidentified your edits as potentially disruptive. I sincerely apologize for this error, and please rest assured that there has been no negative finding against you above. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. Respectfully, Mz7 (talk) 23:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

× Hi Mz7 Thanks for responding to the issue raised and my defense. I appreciate. Regards Dbaidoo (talk) 02:48, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mirrors edit

  Thanks for contributing to the article Cocoa production in Ghana ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 14:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


Thanks for the alert. I am new to editing and providing citations on Wikipedia. I have realized that I am improving as I continue to develop on the work. I be careful to following all your alerts and corrections which are welcomed by me.

Thanks.Dbaidoo (talk) 14:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I know it's hard to spot those sometimes. Kuru (talk) 15:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


Hi I have looked through the document but could not find where the issue raised could be located. Could you please redirect to where the issue raised is for a possible substitution of the citation inserted. Thanks Dbaidoo (talk) 02:54, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sure.
  • In this edit, you added a reference to "wikiwand". The page there notes at the top of the page "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". It further notes that "This page is based on a Wikipedia article written by contributors (read/edit)." at the bottom of the page. As the text was clearly copied from here, it cannot be used as a reference.
  • In this edit, you added a reference to "enacademic.com" which notes the source as "Wikipedia" at the top of the page, and includes an attribute to "Wikimedia Foundation. 2010." at the bottom.
Please let me know if you have any other questions. Kuru (talk) 13:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kuru, thanks once again for alert and for helping with this issue. I checked to replace with an external citation but realized it had been removed and that is fine with me. Kind regardsDbaidoo (talk) 15:23, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. You just added a reference to "peoplepill" here. This site has this disclaimer at the bottom: "The contents of this page are sourced from Wikipedia article." Please take the time to evaluate these references - if they have the same sentences as the Wikipedia article, that's usual;y a clue that something is wrong. (either they copied us, or we copied them) Kuru (talk) 17:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Majavah was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 Majavah talk · edits 17:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Dbaidoo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!  Majavah talk · edits 17:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Dbaidoo (talk) 20:59, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

African Library and Information Associations and Institutions (AfLIA) Week Celebration: the Wikipedia assignment

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Dbaidoo (talk) 20:59, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dbaidoo (talk) 20:59, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of From Colonialism to Freedom edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on From Colonialism to Freedom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Loksmythe (talk) 18:08, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

From Colonialism to Freedom moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, From Colonialism to Freedom, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 19:49, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

What do I do if I complete the article and I need it back on the mainspace? Thanks. --Dbaidoo (talk) 07:38, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Once it is complete you can submit it for review by following the instructions in the box on the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 13:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of From Colonialism to Freedom edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on From Colonialism to Freedom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Noahfgodard (talk) 15:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

The page was moved to the draft and working on it. Thanks.--Dbaidoo (talk) 17:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've moved it to User:Dbaidoo/From Colonialism to Freedom again since it appears that you accidentally recreated it in the main article space. Please note that the topic matter falls under the existing Ghana article, so the content should probably be added there instead of as its own article. Additionally, remember to keep a neutral, encyclopedic tone when writing about topics. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me! Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:43, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2020 edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:African Library and Information Associations and Institutions, from its old location at User:Dbaidoo/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, Dbaidoo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: African Library and Information Associations and Institutions (August 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

The writer Dbaidoo wrote this article whiles in a contest with AfLIA 1Lib1Ref campaign for African Librarian. The write-up was based on the writer's own experiences of the programme. The writer had only used the name of the association and can change the title if possible. The whole write-up was not plagiarised. Thanks. --Dbaidoo (talk) 03:46, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem: Draft:African Library and Information Associations and Institutions edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:African Library and Information Associations and Institutions, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://web.aflia.net/about-aflia/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:African Library and Information Associations and Institutions saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:57, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

The writer Dbaidoo wrote this article whiles in a contest with AfLIA 1Lib1Ref campaign for African Librarian. The write-up was based on the writer's own experiences of the programme. The writer had only used the name of the association and can change the title if possible. The whole write-up was not plagiarised. Thanks.--Dbaidoo (talk) 03:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kwame Nkrumah commanding power for freedom.png edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Kwame Nkrumah commanding power for freedom.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://thepeoplesnewsafrica.com/kwamer-nkrumah-the-black-african/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikiacc () 00:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: From Colonialism to Freedom (August 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ɔkɔdeɛ edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ɔkɔdeɛ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. noq (talk) 14:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:From Colonialism to Freedom edit

 

Hello, Dbaidoo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "From Colonialism to Freedom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your edits to Information science edit

Hi Dbaidoo, I'm afraid I have reverted the references you added to Information science in this series of edits. I noticed one that did not look like it would have anything to do with the topic – a book called Ableism in academia : theorising experiences of disabilities and chronic illnesses in higher education which you added as a reference for the sentence "An information scientist is an individual, usually with a relevant subject degree or high level of subject knowledge, who provides focused information to scientific and technical research staff in industry or to subject faculty and students in academia." You did not provide a page number for where the text about information scientists could be found – that is important when you quote a 245-page book – but I assumed that you had access to the work and would have been able to verify that the sentence was in fact supported. Then I started looking at the other references you added, and when I had looked at six different references I was unable to find that any of them even mentioned the topic, and then I simply removed them all. Which part of this article about Dutch compound verbs supports the assertion that "[information science] tackles systemic problems first rather than individual pieces of technology within that system"? I can access this book about housing issues in the United States through my university, but I fail to find any mention of information science, much less of the claim that "one can see information science as a response to technological determinism, the belief that technology "develops by its own laws, that it realizes its own potential, limited only by the material resources available and the creativity of its developers". Looking more closely at that bit of text, I realised that you had added the reference in the middle of a verbatim quote from another source (which was already in the article). You did the same thing elsewhere in the article – in the "Definitions" section, you inserted three different reference in a blockquote from an identified source. None of those three sources included the quoted text, but even if they had, it would have been pointless to include them. The text already has a clearly identified source.

I am not sure what your purpose was – you are clearly not a spammer, but this addition of entirely unrelated references is not constructive, I'm afraid. Have a look at this policy to get more information about why Wikipedia articles have sources, and what the sources should do. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 14:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply


Just to note that I have also reverted your additions to E-book since they were equally unconnected to the topic. This online edition of a book catalogue from 1738 definitely doesn't tell us anything about the trend of print and e-books moving onto the Internet in the 2000s, and this text about concrete in the natural environment, does not support the information that the e-reader had an imagined precursor in a manifesto from the 1930s. Maybe you noticed the word "manifesto" and thought that on its own made the concrete book a useful source for that information? (In any case, there is a source for that, so another one is not required.) --bonadea contributions talk 14:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please ask a computing expert to help when adding references to library (computing) edit

Topics in computing, such as "libraries" of code in computer software, are a very specialized topic, which uses common English words to refer to things very different from the way they're used in common situations - and a term may even be used in more than one different sense in computing.

For example, "relocation" in computing is very different from "relocation" in the sense of a person moving or "relocation" in the sense of a business or an organization such as a library moving, and "linking" to a library is different from "linking" to another web page.

You should probably ask for help from somebody in the Department of Computer Science and Information Systems at your university. They should be able to determine whether a given reference is relevant to a particular item. Guy Harris (talk) 07:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Failed verification in one of your edit edit

Hi Dbaidoo, you added [this source] to the slavery in contemporary Africa article. But the source talks about the Atlantic Slave Trade in Central Africa. Where does it say that the Ashanti Empire existed in a state of perpetual warfare for slaves. Do you mind sharing the pages and text for verification?(Kwesi Yema (talk) 11:58, 10 October 2022 (UTC))Reply