Dallae, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Dallae! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

edit
 

Hello, Dallae, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. If you need assistance, check out the Getting Help section below or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please always fill in the edit summary field to describe your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. North America1000 21:16, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

Writing articles
The community
Miscellaneous

Invitation to join WikiProject Food and drink

edit
 
Hello, Dallae.

You are invited to join WikiProject Food and drink, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of food, drink and cuisine topics.
Please check out the project, and if interested feel free to join by adding your name to the member list. You can also sign up to receive project newsletters and notifications at the notifications list, even if you choose not to join. North America1000 21:16, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

June 2017

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kelp tea. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You are engaged in edit warring, WP:3RR. Please work through a better reference and discuss on the Talk page. Zefr (talk) 04:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Zefr: You removed referenced sentences with a reliable tertiary source, blanked your talk page, and removed my comment from Talk:Kelp tea page. Please stop doing them. --Dallae (talk) 04:29, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Content should be discussed on the article talk page. Zefr deletes everything from their user page. Don't personalize things. Do pay attention to the policies and guidelines that govern what we do here. Jytdog (talk) 04:56, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Please also know that every editor has the "right" to remove a comment from their own talk page. See WP:OWNTALK. You are brand new here and don't know what you are doing, and you are being way too aggressive. Jytdog (talk) 05:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Edit war warning

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Kelp tea shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 04:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Actually, you went way too far already.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 05:04, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

June 2017

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Kelp tea. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:37, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Dallae. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply