User talk:Daß Wölf/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Welcome

Hello, Daß Wölf, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 01:38, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Daß Wölf (talk) 01:39, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Not a problem. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 02:34, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Daß Wölf, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Daß Wölf! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of L.A. Takedown

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article L.A. Takedown you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 14 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. 23W 17:00, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of L.A. Takedown

The article L.A. Takedown you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 14 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:L.A. Takedown for things which need to be addressed.

DYK for L.A. Takedown

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:42, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Re: Climate of Malta

...because:

• in section of Daylight you did logical error: Malta not enjoys one of the highest amounts of hours of daylight in Europe. Malta enjoys one of the most optimal arrangement of hours of daylight in Europe beacuse days in winter are not as short as in the northern part of the continent. In the northern part of the Europe days in winter is too short and days in summer is too long, Malta has better proportions but the total length of day / night is the same for whole Europe.
• is sea temperatures, you deleted bold. Subtropical-man talk
  (en-2) 19:10, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Generally, your change in tables of sea temperature did not make any visual changes: [1] [2] but your change is incorrect. If you want delete bold you must remove tags from two sides of names of months (if class="wikitable" near the tag of "!" will not apply bold automatically). However, other articles and standard weatherboxes use bold names of months. So if you want to change it, should be a consensus. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 19:31, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Yes, ! does make the text bold, at least in Firefox and also other. Your change in tables of sea temperature did not make any visual changes, so you change is redundant. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 21:34, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Croatian Natural History Museum

added a link pointing to Atrium

Dramalj

added a link pointing to Bora

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

An invitation to join the WikiProject Croatia

WikiProject Croatia
Project Icon Hi, Daß Wölf, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the WikiProject Croatia! WikiProject Croatia is a WikiProject whose aim is to improve the quality and coverage of articles related to Croatia and the Croats. It is chiefly designed to help users collaborate on articles, but also to resolve open questions and disputes, to establish project-wide conventions, and to coordinate work on vandalism clean-up. WikiProject Croatia currently covers a total of 17,856 articles and 8,393 other related pages on the English Wikipedia.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

Let me just say a nice job on the Croatian Natural History Museum, and I can only hope there's more coming... GregorB (talk) 21:30, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Re: Croatian Natural History Museum

Absolutely! The article is on my watchlist now; I'll take a look and possibly leave a comment in the article's talk page. Regarding the GA nom, I'm available should there be any questions or problems. GregorB (talk) 15:59, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Ferdinand Budicki

Is this a DYK candidate? Well, I'd say it should be... GregorB (talk) 19:46, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

There's the first driving licence, and also apparently the first traffic ticket...[3] :-) GregorB (talk) 06:57, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Indeed, he was a very interesting guy, so at least finding a hook shouldn't be a problem... GregorB (talk) 17:39, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Baron Franz von der Trenck

added a link pointing to Gulden

Samoborček

added a link pointing to Omnibus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Croatian Natural History Museum

Good call on the importance: indeed, Croatian Encyclopedia having an entry (unlike most Croatian museums) also roughly indicates importance class above "Low".

Still haven't taken a closer look - will do that one of these days... GregorB (talk) 09:25, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ferdinand Budicki

Thanks for helping Victuallers (talk 23:05, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spencer Halpin's Moral Kombat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob McKenzie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Croatian Natural History Museum

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:16, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Vrtare Male

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:17, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Beverly Hills Cop (soundtrack)

added a link pointing to Paramount

Cyborg 2

added a link pointing to Android

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Max Havoc: Curse of the Dragon

Seems to me the article by Mike Leeder at ImpactOnline is not a reliable source seeing as Leeder is a producer (therefore essentially an employee) for Albert Pyun [4]. While ImpactOnline may or may not be a reliable source, an interview/article written by Leeder re: Pyun most certainly has bias and point-of-view problems. Sprinkler21 (talk) 20:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)Sprinkler21

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2-Headed Shark Attack

added a link pointing to Lifeboat

Kickboxer 2

added a link pointing to Stephen Friedman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Duke Nukem Forever

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Duke Nukem Forever you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 13:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Duke Nukem Forever

The article Duke Nukem Forever you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Duke Nukem Forever for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 14:41, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Sorry

I just wanted to apologize for reverting one of your recent edits. It was my mistake, as I misread the diff. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:01, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

No worries, no harm done :) Daß Wölf (talk) 20:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1954 Zagreb tram accident, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page M-24. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: Lenuzzi's Horseshoe

No problem! I'm thinking of something silly, like "Did you know that there is a large horseshoe in downtown Zagreb?" (cf. Una-class submarine). I'll take a closer look tomorrow... GregorB (talk) 19:54, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes, it's in public domain now. If you agree, I'll transfer the image to the Commons so that it could be used in the article (today evening, time permitting). GregorB (talk) 08:05, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Done. After uploading, I noticed that the same map was already there, only in better quality. Anyway, problem solved. GregorB (talk) 19:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Daß Wölf. You have new messages at Talk:Timeline of Zagreb.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your GA nomination of Species (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Species (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 21:20, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Species (film)

The article Species (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Species (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 02:40, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Max Havoc: Curse of the Dragon

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Max Havoc: Curse of the Dragon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 03:40, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Max Havoc: Curse of the Dragon

The article Max Havoc: Curse of the Dragon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Max Havoc: Curse of the Dragon for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 17:20, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Species (film)

The article Species (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Species (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Max Havoc: Curse of the Dragon

The article Max Havoc: Curse of the Dragon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Max Havoc: Curse of the Dragon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the analysis at RfD

Thanks for the analysis over at {{WP:RFD]] for Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion#Picki_u_dusa. I am not good at Slavic languages, I live in Hungary and Hungarian language is a bit of an outlier, not Slavic nor Latinate nor Germanic, it is just Hungarian. So I tend to encounter a bit of these things as nouns etc. but would have no idea how they conjugate or decline; your analysis at WP:RFD was a perfect example of explanation without being patronising (as I am probably being but don't mean to be, just wanted to say a sincere thanks). Si Trew (talk) 20:13, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Any time, SimonTrew. It never hurts to take a guess :) Daß Wölf (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Lenuci Horseshoe

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Great work!

Thanks for your excellent article work. Can I interest you in joining WP:Intertranswiki? Each month we have a batch of articles to translate or write and I'm happy to regular put up Croatian articles which you want started!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:02, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: I'll give some of those a try, but the problem with hr.wiki articles is that they're usually poorly written and unsourced. A month ago I had an attempt at transwikiing 1954 Zagreb tram accident, which seemed a nice enough article in Croatian, but turned out to be a copyvio so I had to write it from scratch. Daß Wölf (talk) 16:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antun Sorkočević, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ragusa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

JFK: Reckless Youth

added links pointing to Kathleen Kennedy, Andrew Miller and Cedric Smith

Blind Faith (miniseries)

added a link pointing to David Andrews

Storm of the Century

added a link pointing to ABC (network)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Croatian Natural History Museum

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Croatian Natural History Museum you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:41, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Congratulations on making Croatian Natural History Museum a GA! GregorB (talk) 21:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much :)) Thanks for your help, too! Daß Wölf (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Croatian Natural History Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Littoral Croatia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Don't know if you saw this on the Max Havoc talk page or not:

Congrats on getting a GA for the article, Daß Wölf! I'm buried also in RL at the moment but do have a comment/issue or two. It seems you've changed a passage in the production (?) section to read that Pyun had to "resort" to a crew from Los Angeles. It's fine that Pyun claims this but it seems we might want to include what some of those Los Angeles crew members thought about Pyun and his direction. There are numerous sources that list problems Los Angeles crews had with Pyun. Also, I don't understand scaling back the controversy section (now the litigation section) when the film is mostly known for its controversy. More later. Congrats again.

Posted this on the MH talk page a while back. Don't know if you saw it or not. Looking for a consensus discussion. Hope you're well. Sprinkler21 (talk) 23:33, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Sprinkler21

@Sprinkler21: Thanks, and thank you too for helping out :) It seems you posted the message in the GA review, I unwatched that page when the review was finished, so unfortunately I missed it. Now, to get on with the issues you raised:

I've removed stuff that was unnecessary and already implied from the controversy section: repeating of dates, when it is obvious what is meant etc. Also, for example I removed the statement by the GEDCA guy that he feels confident Laing will pay up. If he was 90% sure Laing was going to stiff him, he would still have had to say the same thing, so that statement really means nothing at all, and can be presumed by the lack thereof. We would have written something had he attacked the debtor publicly, since that is what creditors don't typically do in such cases. I also removed the details about extending the deadline. This is implied, as they did not outright sue him for missing the payment, which it would have said in the article, had they done that.

Re: Los Angeles crew vs. Pyun, from all the sources I've seen, it seems one guy was interviewed about it – Ralph Coon(s), who was an assistant lighting technician. He claimed that the rest of the crew was uneasy about it, but no one else came out to back him up. He may have been telling the truth, but we can't presume that he wasn't lying, and in the end he was one technician. Many people working in large projects end up disgruntled, rightfully or not; I'm sure you would have found someone agitated and willing to talk to the press in pretty much any Hollywood project. While he did get five paragraphs in the L.A. Times article and the film director got one, that in fact begs some questions about undue weight in the L.A. Times article itself.

If you want to include Coon(s)'s opinion in the article, how to word it? "A member of the Los Angeles crew claimed the film crew deemed the project unprofessional"? "A member of the Los Angeles crew said the filming was done haphazardly"? Such sentences bring in mind WP:UNDUE (which was by the way cited by the GA reviewer for the Controversy/Litigation section). Stanley Kubrick was, for example, notorious for harassing the actors and crew, and demanding retake after retake, yet 2001: A Space Odyssey, a much longer GA than Max Havoc, does not mention this at all.

As for film being mostly known for its controversy, that is most definitely true on Guam, but I wouldn't know about the rest of the world. One of the sources says that the film made $250,000 worldwide (from DVD rentals and sales presumably). That would mean that at least tens of thousands of people have seen it. I, for instance, got it as a double feature for around $2, and surely not the entire $1 goes towards the gross income of Laing et al, so it may have even been hundreds of thousands. I believe most of those people don't read L.A. Times, Guam press or online critic reviews, and apart from that it didn't get that much fanfare; I was completely oblivious to the controversy until I came upon the Wikipedia article. Therefore I would say that casting, production, etc. are just as important in this case.

I'm sorry if this has ended up a rude wall of text, I just wanted to explain everything I've written/edited about Max Havoc. Thanks again really for taking time to contribute to the article :)) You did a lot of good work looking up sources and writing the article and I really appreciate it :) Cheers, Daß Wölf (talk) 14:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the response and willingness for consensus. It might be awhile before I can give this much attention. Unfortunately RL keeps popping up. Coons was not the only LA crew member interviewed about working on Max Havoc w/Pyun. A sound man was interviewed in the Pacific Daily News and stated that he felt duped by Pyun. Something about being hired for Max Havoc (a film) and being forced to work on a commercial for Pyun while on Guam and something about his rate being more for commercials and that Pyun was dishonest about the whole thing. The sound man also stated he felt the MH production under Pyun was amateurish. Also, I believe an LA assistant costume person was interviewed by PDN about the troubled production. When I have a moment I'm going to have to dig through my PDN archives for these interviews, but I know they exist. I don't feel your Stanley Kubrick/2001 comparisons is relevant here as 2001 had no financing/production controversies large enough to overshadow Kubrick's film itself. Even though you didn't know anything about the controversy surrounding MH when you picked up the DVD, as soon as you did an internet search on the film, that's pretty much the majority of information you found. It's what the film has become known for. I feel the editing of the controversy (litigation) section is bad for the article.

It'll be a while before I can work on the article some more, but I do intend to do so. Sprinkler21 (talk) 17:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Sprinkler21

If you can dig up the interviews, that might be a useful addition, but I would be a little bit careful using only sources from Guam for this matter. Re: doing an internet search, actually it is not. Maybe you're searching from a Guam Google mirror, but over here, I have to go to the fifth page of Google results to reach the first webpage strictly about the controversy. Several critic reviews mention it, but not hard to miss in most of them except DVD Talk's, and they are all even farther behind the L.A. Times article. I had certainly never heard of the situation before I came across the Wikipedia article. Part of the reason for this is probably good SEO work by Amazon, eBay, IMDb et al, but nonetheless I highly doubt that the majority of people are coming to this page because of the controversy. Daß Wölf (talk) 16:02, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Are the media from Guam not valid sources? Sprinkler21 (talk) 16:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Sprinkler21

@Sprinkler21: Sorry for the belated response, I've been really busy in the past week. Media from Guam are valid sources per se, but care should be taken to not show a Guam-side bias. Almost two-thirds of the sources in the article are publications on Guam, whereas the film has made an (albeit pretty minor) worldwide impact. Daß Wölf (talk) 16:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Not much time for Wiki work, but I did dig this up Re: Los Angeles sound guy on MH. See last two ¶'s or so: [[5]]. In the coming days I'll try to find what Los Angeles assistant costume woman said to the PDN re: MH experiences. If we're going to say (or say Pyun said) that he had to "resort" (a negative connotation) to hiring Los Angeles crew and that he "regretted" it later (another negative connotation), then I feel it's important to hear from the Los Angeles crew. And it's more then just Coons. Here is another Los Angeles crew member, Sean Skinner. Sprinkler21 (talk) 02:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Sprinkler21

@Sprinkler21: I've read your link and he just says he was talked into doing more work and hasn't been paid. That has been mentioned already ("Guam businesses and Max Havoc: Curse of the Dragon crew members also reported not being paid for work on the film.[6][7]"). Re: "resort" and "regretted", I've changed it up a bit, I think this is more neutral, but we shouldn't hide that Pyun had an ill feeling about them.

And we shouldn't hide how the Los Angeles crew felt about Pyun. I understand that the cited source has been mentioned in the article re: Sean Skinner not being paid, but it also contains information not in the article: that a Los Angeles crew member (other then Coons) came onto the film getting more than he bargained for. This is fundamentally different then just getting talked into doing more work. The MH article presents different viewpoints with how GEDCA felt about things and how producer John Laing felt about things. Why not include information about how crew members felt about working on the film under Pyun especially if you're going to make a point about saying Pyun had ill feelings about them. Seems Los Angeles crew Coons and Skinner didn't think much of him either. To not include this is disingenuous and not presenting all sides. Sprinkler21 (talk) 01:13, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Sprinkler21

@Sprinkler21: When it says "the Guam project was not what he had bargained for", getting talked into doing more work is exactly the first thing on my mind. He got talked into working for lower pay -- that's not good, but hardly a crime. He was not paid, which presumably is some sort of a crime, but it has already been mentioned in the article. If there was anything more sinister than that, it isn't in the link. As for his feelings for Pyun, I couldn't find Skinner mentioning him at all. Daß Wölf (talk) 00:23, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

So you feel no mention should be made that Coons had a problem with Pyun and that Skinner got more then he bargained for by doing extra work? Both bits of information, I feel, is different information then people not getting paid. Perhaps it's time for WP:3. Sprinkler21 (talk) 14:51, 29 November 2015 (UTC)Sprinkler21

@Sprinkler21: Yes, that is my opinion. IIRC, Coons is the only person we've found so far in reliable sources who complained about the quality of Pyun's work. Second, I can't see why you feel that way about Skinner's situation. English is not my mother language, but I'm fairly sure of my understanding of that paragraph. Are you sure you didn't forget to mention another source here? If you didn't, feel free to bring this to WP:3O. That is certainly a good suggestion, as we've been going back and forth about this; it's nigh time someone else had a look at this matter :) Daß Wölf (talk) 18:44, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Response to third opinion request:

It seems to me that giving more coverage to this controversy would be WP:UNDUE per the arguments given. The controversy seems to be too local unless sources could be presented which otherwise prove that it's not. If I understood correctly, there is a proposal to add Skinner "getting more than he bargained for" and Coons' complain about Pyun. I think it's fine how the article is: the mention "Pyun had to resort..." as well as the report that staff didn't get paid seem balanced enough to me. Further, I commend both the editors for maintaining civility and having a healthy discussion. Something like this is honestly, quite rare to see in my experience. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:39, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the opinion, I understood it the same way and I agree with you, Ugog. Pinging @Sprinkler21: in case he's not watching this page. Daß Wölf (talk) 19:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

I don't agree with either of you, but that's the way it goes. Sprinkler21 (talk) 04:18, 15 December 2015 (UTC)Sprinkler21

Review of Banker's right to combine accounts

Thanks for your review of the article. I note you put a {{globalize}} tag on it, but I did try to make clear from the first sentence that the article was intended to be about a concept which arises under English law. I have no idea if other legal systems employ a similar concept. --Legis (talk - contribs) 15:23, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

@Legis: I'd expect many countries to have something similar. However, IANAL and had no luck finding out if this exists in my country short of trying to read the law, and I suppose most other readers similarly won't be able to contribute, so the tag would really only elicit help from a small minority. To add to that, I've read the article again, and the English example seems fairly specific. If other examples get covered on Wikipedia, this one would probably be branched out into its own article, so I'm fine with keeping the scope of the article as it is. Daß Wölf (talk) 00:00, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baba Yaga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulgarian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cruel Intentions, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jock and In the closet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

IP who blanks talk page discussions

In this edit, you said that an IP editor "accidentally deleted" a talk page discussion. This was not an accident. This IP editor is very disruptive and will occasionally remove talk page posts that he/she does not like. For example: here and here. If you see a Malaysian IP editor who blanks talk page discussions, especially ones about move requests, it's this one. I've had several of my talk page comments removed. If you notice it, just revert it and issue a warning. It's been going on for a while now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:24, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

@NinjaRobotPirate: Thanks for the heads up, I wasn't aware of this. It did look a little fishy but I assumed good faith anyway. Daß Wölf 16:54, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Max Durocher - hostage, or chattel slave?

If Vincent were to say, "Drop that gun or else I'll shoot Max here - and you could never get a shot off with him in front of me" or "my ECG is hooked up to Max's vest right there, and if my heart stops beating, we'll all go up in a huge explosion" and mean any of these things, then Max would have been Vincent's hostage. None of the tasks Vincent forces Max to perform are hostage related except for Max's mom being Vincent's hostage. Max's mom is the hostage. Max is the chattel slave. 130.105.213.140 (talk) 06:50, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

You should read our article on slavery. What you want to describe is a willing accomplice (even though that is not true, Vincent threatens Max's life numerous times throughout the movie). A chattel slave, on the contrary, is a person to be bought and sold (hence "chattel"), while Vincent obviously didn't buy Max and cannot sell him to anyone. While hostage might not be the perfect word, chattel slave is a much worse fit. Daß Wölf 17:18, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Bought, sold - and originally stolen. A lot of chattel slaves are like that - they start out stolen. Slavery doesn't make a good fit for property norms. Vincent stole Max, and I really wouldn't put it beyond Vincent to try to sell Max. 130.105.213.140 (talk) 05:54, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

WP:PC2016

Hi Daß Wölf, on your oppose. Just to clarify, PC2 has no consensus for use here on the English Wikipedia at all (hence in some sense, there isn't truly an "existing" PC2 protection today), and no pages (outside of 3 test pages) actually use the current level, with concerns that it subjects far too many productive users to review, and does not assume good faith. Part of the motivation behind the redefinition was to make it a bit more inclusive. Anyway, just an FYI — Andy W. (talk) 03:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Daß Wölf. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Air Commerce

Hello, I appreciated a lot your edits at Air Commerce. There is just one minor aspect. You made a link to Donbassaero. The source I used says the Yak-42 was leased from "Donbass-Eastern Ukrainian airlines" (they use this exact words). I also made a search to find if there was any article for that airline and I didn't found any. I noteced the one you linked, Donbassaero, but there is one inconsistancy with it. Air Commerce used the Yak-42 in 1991 and 1992, while Donbassaero was founded in 1993. Seems "Donbass-Eastern Ukrainian airlines" was some other airline prior to Donbassaero, possibly its precedent, but possibly not, it is hard to know as there were literaly hundreds of new airliners appearing in former Soviet Union in those years and many of them opperated Yak-42 which was a very commum plane for short-range flights. I would also want to appologise to you for my perhaps hard words atmy edit-summary at Terrorism in Yugoslavia, I precipitated myselfthinking you were another user who also had "Wolf" in his name who ws years ago usually very active and tendentious against Serb-POV. Anyway, I do think you could adress the exact issuesyou believe make the artcle unbalanced and cite the sourcesyou find unreliablebefore tagging the article, which seems to be still in creation process by the author. Wish you happy Hollydays, kindly, FkpCascais (talk) 03:48, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

@FkpCascais: Feel free to revert the Donbassaero addition, of course. I don't know the name of the actual airline in question, I was just looking for something to link to, and Donbassaero seemed to be a good choice as it was the only airline from that area and with a similar enough name, so I assumed that's the one. I admit, I should've done more research.

As for the terrorism article, I do think we shouldn't rely on Serbian and Serbian expat sources so heavily. The whole matter of Yugoslav politics and determining what actually happened back then is a quagmire even today, and there are a lot of improperly politicised works being written by academics hailing from all ex-Yugoslav countries, not to mention anti-Serb, anti-Croat and anti-Bosniak sentiment being pushed for political points. Personally, I'm not interested in any of that stuff and abhor politics in general, so I can't tell how accurate the article is and I would be glad to recuse from the matter ASAP. I'll AGF that User:Zoupan has done their research, but as the references and external links contain articles from Kurir, 1993 Politika and a Yugoslav Communist Party newspaper, I think it would certainly benefit from expert attention. Therefore I think I would not be wrong in restoring the {{unreliable sources}} tag for the time being. If you disagree, it might be for the best to bring it to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard.

Happy holidays to you too, and no hard feelings, it's good to be WP:BOLD sometimes :) Daß Wölf 00:34, 27 December 2016 (UTC)