Chainsawpunk

Welcome!

Hello, Chainsawpunk!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Netherzone (talk) 14:55, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! I have made some edits and am hoping to resubmit shortly. It's a little difficult to narrow down the exhibitions to that few. Do you think it will get flagged if I narrow it slightly? Chainsawpunk (talk) 20:30, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

I saw the changes you made in table format. In all honesty, @Chainsawpunk I think it still needs to be trimmed. WP is an encyclopedia, which is very different than an artist's personal website, or a gallery website. Articles should be written concisely. I was tempted to edit the draft myself, but did not want you to feel like your toes were being stepped on. To my mind, the table is a) too long, and b) has a lot of repetitive data and c) relies mainly on one source. It is clear that he was a highly respected and exhibited artist; trust that. Here are some suggestions: I'd start a prose section that states that Shields had solo shows at Paula Cooper gallery annually or semiannually. We don't need to list each year when those shows took place because it is redundant info. Then, I'd select the solo shows at notable museums - those with a blue link, and cut out everything else. If our readership wants to know all the shows he's had, they can simply click a link to his website for that info. If you are comfortable, I can help out with the editing, just let me know. All the best, and thank you for the work you have done! Netherzone (talk) 22:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

This is a great response thank you! I am going to try to edit it one more time with your suggestions in mind! If it doesn't work out then, I would love your help and suggestions. Chainsawpunk (talk) 00:52, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Wow!!! I Just saw all of the articles you have written and I am in awe!! Really amazing contributions and I hope to add as many. Thank you for all the work you've done, can't wait to read them :) Chainsawpunk (talk) 14:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello! I wanted to let you know why I changed the wikiprojects on the article talk page. Museum wikiprojects are for museums themselves as corporate or organizational entities, we don't use them on artist articles even if those artists have work in the museum collections. I moved the Textile arts WProj. inside the WIkiProject banner shell to keep things tidy. Next, I will modify the Biography tag - you can watch what I do to learn how to do this for your next article. Happy editing. Netherzone (talk) 19:18, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Okay thank you! I was just trying to figure out the tagging system for this and a few other articles I have pending. Thanks for clarity and all your help. Chainsawpunk (talk) 19:20, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

If you have questions, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page User talk:Netherzone or "ping" me here by using a template like {{u|Name of editor you want to notify}} - that is two curly brackets: {, the letter u, the pipe symbol | (above the backslash on most keyboards), then close the template with two closing curly brackets } . More information on notifications can be found here: Help:Notifications. Netherzone (talk) 19:29, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

I also fixed some of the redlinks in the exhibitions section of the article. Netherzone (talk) 19:45, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Alan Shields

Hello! I saw your draft article on Alan Shields. He was a great artist, whose work I have admired for many years. If you are open to hearing feedback on the draft, I would suggest removing the long CV-like list of exhibitions, and instead select 5 or so of the most prestigious solo shows. Each of these should have a citation so that the shows can be verified. It could be then written in paragraph form with a sentence or two on the work in each show. (It's not necessary to write it in prose-style but it's more encyclopedic). The reason for this suggestion is that we see a lot of promotional articles for artists and actors, and I wouldn't want the article to be flagged as promotional content or maintenance-tagged for being resume-like. Just so you know there is a backlog at Articles for Creation, and it can sometimes take weeks to months for a draft to make it thru the process. Just sharing some thoughts as I see this is your first article. Will post a more formal Welcome message. Netherzone (talk) 14:54, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Shields (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alan Shields and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alan Shields, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 22:55, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Chainsawpunk! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 22:55, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chainsawpunk (talk) 18:49, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

I have edited with your suggestions in mind!

AfC notification: Draft:Marsha Cottrell has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marsha Cottrell. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:14, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Photo in Draft:Marsha Cottrell

Hi, in reviewing the Draft:Marsha Cottrell I noticed that you had uploaded the image used there as your 'own work'. This suggests that you may have an external relationship with the person in question, given that you have been at close enough quarters to take such a photo. I will post another message below with instructions for declaring and dealing with conflicts of interest (COI); please action as needed. Alternatively, it could be that you have no such relationship, and didn't in fact take that photo, but then you shouldn't have uploaded it as your own work, since you may not have the necessary rights to do that. Grateful if you could clarify either way. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

I could just remove it. I did not take the photo but I emailed her gallery for a photograph. Didn't realize how else to upload it. Chainsawpunk (talk) 16:25, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, when you e-mailed them for a photo, they probably assumed you just wanted to have the photo for your own use; not that you would release it into the public domain under commons licence so anyone can do whatever they want with it. That's why the upload system asks you to confirm that you have the right to do what you're about to do, before you upload it. This isn't just a case of uploading a photo to a website; it's a case of fundamentally changing the copyright conditions applicable to that photo. If you're now saying that this photo isn't actually your own work, then I will go and ask for it to be deleted. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes please! Thanks Chainsawpunk (talk) 16:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marsha Cottrell (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marsha Cottrell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marsha Cottrell, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:36, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Chainsawpunk! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Talk page? Secret edits?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sal Salandra (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sal Salandra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sal Salandra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Shields has been accepted

Alan Shields, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 01:24, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Penn has been accepted

Sara Penn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 08:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Awesome Chainsawpunk (talk) 14:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations on your second new article! It looks really great and it's wonderful to learn about the history of her store Knobkerry. I saw that a show at The Sculpture Center, sorry to have missed that last year. It's also surprising to see redlinks for the Cedar Bar, Ken Tisa, Niloufar Emamifar, and SoiL Thornton and that we don't have articles for these yet. Ever onward! Netherzone (talk) 15:17, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! I was thinking I might start a Ken Tisa or Cedar Bar article once I finish the other drafts I'm working on. The Sculpture Center show was great! I really appreciated the free PDF with the Knobkerry oral history they made available on their website. It's a great read and I learned so much. Chainsawpunk (talk) 15:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Great to know about the free PDF! Cheers, Netherzone (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Sounds like you're giving us homework :D

I'll take those assignments. Star Mississippi 16:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Hahahaha sorry~ But I loved it so much I have to spread the word! Chainsawpunk (talk) 18:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

It's great to have wiki-pals with common interests! Netherzone (talk) 18:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Absolutely. Makes collaboration even more fun! Star Mississippi 19:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Greg Colfax KlaWayHee has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Greg Colfax KlaWayHee. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greg Colfax KlaWayHee has been accepted

Greg Colfax KlaWayHee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 16:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks!! Awesome Chainsawpunk (talk) 19:19, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marsha Cottrell has been accepted

Marsha Cottrell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:14, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Chainsawpunk! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Images, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Chainsawpunk! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Accidentally posted a draft!, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Chainsawpunk! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wikidata?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sal Salandra has been accepted

Sal Salandra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 22:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Wow, what a fascinating artist and subject matter. He's definitely notable, so I've accepted it. I tweaked it a little for flow, but let me know if you disagree and I'm happy to go back to your style. Star Mississippi 22:50, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! I appreciate all the help you've given me. Chainsawpunk (talk) 15:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Any time. Some folks have been along for the projects, category tweaks but it's in good shape. Any others you have in the queue? Happy to have a look. Star Mississippi 16:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

The Jusaburō Tsujimura article is the last one I have queued right now – you had offered some advice but I haven't had too much time to work on it lately. Any help you can offer is always much appreciated! Chainsawpunk (talk) 16:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Chainsawpunk! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Anything to do for drafts?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Chainsawpunk

Thank you for creating Sara Penn.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! Chainsawpunk (talk) 14:11, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jusaburō Tsujimura has been accepted

Jusaburō Tsujimura, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 15:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path
		For your excellent contributions, especially in the visual arts. Keep up the great work, Chainsawpunk! Netherzone (talk) 17:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Wooo! Thank you!!!! I'll be back to make more soon! Chainsawpunk (talk) 19:19, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays

Ohara Shoson (Koson), Egrets in Snow, Ohara Koson, 1927	Have a wonderful holiday season filled with peace, joy, prosperity and wonder.
	Hi Chainsawpunk, Thank you for all your contributions during the year. It's been great collaborating with you on article improvements! May your 2023 be filled with creativity and good health. Image: Egrets in Snow, Ohara Koson, 1927 Netherzone (talk) 22:48, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm back and working on some new artices again. Chainsawpunk (talk) 20:50, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oren Pinhassi has been accepted

Oren Pinhassi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Asparagusus (interaction) 22:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Oren Pinhassi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Oren Pinhassi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, @Onel5969, as a courtesy to the article creator @Chainsawpunk, I have added multiple reviews (and citations) in reliable sources such as Domus magazine, The Guardian, Contemporary Art Review, The Quietus, and Sculpture Magazine. Also, the Pollock-Krasner Foundation grant is a highly competitive notable award. I think he meets GNG now. Netherzone (talk) 19:47, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Cool. Feel free to move it back to mainspace and mark it reviewed if you feel it passes GNG now. Nice effort. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:58, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Done! Netherzone (talk) 20:09, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oren Pinhassi has been accepted

Oren Pinhassi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Netherzone (talk) 20:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

thank you for all your help always! Chainsawpunk (talk) 03:04, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madame Zo has been accepted

Madame Zo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Netherzone (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Oh wow, I literally just pressed post on your talk page! Same wavelength... Thank you! Chainsawpunk (talk) 15:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The Barnstar of Fine Arts
		For you contributions on contemporary textile artists. Thank you for bringing these articles to our readership. Keep up the great work! Netherzone (talk) 16:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you!! Chainsawpunk (talk) 19:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Amy Brener has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Amy Brener. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:25, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matthew Kirk (artist) has been accepted

Matthew Kirk (artist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:35, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Chainsawpunk (talk) 15:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Ken Tisa

Hello! I saw your draft at Articles for Creation on Ken Tisa. He is definitely notable! However because I have a conflict of interest, so I can't approve the draft. That will have to be left to another reviewer. I can, however, help develop it in draft space. Once in article space, I will not edit it directly but use the talk page to make suggestions for improvement. Netherzone (talk) 18:43, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Okay! Happy to hear any feedback. Thank you as always for your help. Chainsawpunk (talk) 18:53, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

I saw the comment on the draft; basically the draft must meet the criteria for notability per the general notability guideline WP:GNG - so multiple in depth reviews of his work in reliable sources. So I started a section in the draft called Reception that can list these publications with citations to help WP reviewers understand his importance and notability. The comment questioned how he meets NARTIST - the criteria can be found here: WP:NARTIST, he needs to meet ONE not all of those criteria. BTW, an artist does not have to meet both GNG and NARTIST, but it is good practice if they do. GNG alone is enough to pass. This is why I often include a section on Collections (criteria #4 of NARTIST) - consensus is that two or more collections in notable museums or national galleries meets this criteria.

So I think we should look for museum collections, so far I've searched MoMA (where he has shown but is not in the collection), the Whitney (where he has donated the work of another artist, but he himself is not in the collection), the Baltimore Museum (since he's taught in Baltimore for a looooong time), but so far have come up cold. However he does meet criteria #3, since he has been in shows like the Whitney Biennial, the show at MoMA/PS1, Philadelphia Museum, and the like.

I'll keep looking for collections, but in the meantime, try to find as many in-depth, verifiable reviews in art magazines, newspapers and art history/theory books such that there is no doubt about GNG. Netherzone (talk) 19:20, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Oh! I just saw that Theroadislong accepted it! Congratulations! Netherzone (talk) 19:21, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! I am going to continue to add to it, I think that he is not in any public collections, which is a little surprising. Kate Werble his dealer does not have any public collections listed on his bio and usually they would be listed there. Chainsawpunk (talk) 19:23, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

I too find this surprising, but I guess he's more of a gallery artist rather than a "museum artist". Do consider mentioning the Whitney Biennial in the article if it's not already there. Netherzone (talk) 19:26, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Added! Thank you. I can't seem to find the Philadelphia museum exhibition he was included in... Chainsawpunk (talk) 19:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

According to his CV he was in the 2019 Off the Wall: American Art to Wear, Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, PA[1]. (a better source should be found since that's a primary source not secondary.) The catalog for the exhibit is on Google Books, but it is not searchable.

BTW, the CV states he's in the collection of the La Salle University Art Museum in Philadelphia, PA which is verifiable [2] so that's one museum collection. I'll bet others will turn up. Netherzone (talk) 19:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Another collection....There is a work of his that was made in collaboration with Kenward Elmslie in the National Gallery of Australia. [3] Netherzone (talk) 19:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

And here is an in-depth review in the Village Voice [4]. Netherzone (talk) 19:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

The work in collaboration with Kenward Elmslie is an artist's book, each of which has an original drawing by Tisa. It's also in the collection of the Otis College of Art & Design artist's books special collection [5]. Because it's a large edition, I'm pretty sure it can be found in other collections too. Netherzone (talk) 20:03, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! I will poke around for the catalogue Chainsawpunk (talk) 20:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Will incorporate the Village Voice review shortly as well. Chainsawpunk (talk) 20:20, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ken Tisa has been accepted

Ken Tisa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:17, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Chainsawpunk (talk) 19:23, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amy Brener (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Festucalex was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amy Brener and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

〜 Festucalex • talk 06:29, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minoru Yoshida has been accepted

Minoru Yoshida, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Milkk7 (talk) 09:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Chainsawpunk. Thank you for your work on Minoru Yoshida. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article on this Japanese artist, it's really interesting work. He meets GNG per the reviews. Wondering if he is in any collections?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 00:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

I know that it is in the Pola Art Foundation, but I think they are private… unfortunately not in any public collections yet but I suspect this will change in the next few years. Chainsawpunk (talk) 00:35, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Do you know what the Japanese translation of his name is? I could try searching on Japanese Google that way... Netherzone (talk) 18:13, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

I'm not 100% sure... But I believe it is 吉田実, not finding much on google though Chainsawpunk (talk) 03:28, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

I saw this press release from Ulterior Gallery with this info.[6] It's a primary source but it might be a place to start.

Minoru Yoshida’s works are in the collection of Ashiya City Museum of Art and History, Hyogo, Japan; Ohara Museum of Art, Okayama, Japan; Takamatsu Municipal Museum, Kagawa, Japan; Niigata Prefectural Museum of Modern Art, Niigata, Japan; and National Museum of Modern Art, Kyoto, Japan. Exhibition history and past awards include; Possible Futures: Japanese Postwar Art and Technology, Inter Communication Center, Tokyo, Japan (2005); Fluorescent Chrysanthemum: Contemporary Japanese Art, ICA London, UK (1968); Gendai no Kuukan ’68: Hikari to Kankyou [Contemporary Space ’68: Lights and Environment], Kobe Sogo Department Store, Hyogo (1968); Nihon Kokusai Bijutsu-ten [Japan International Art Exhibition], Ohara Museum Purchase Prize (1967), Tokyo Metropolitan Art Museum, Tokyo and Kyoto Municipal Museum of Art, Kyoto, Japan ; Mainichi Gendai Bijutsu-ten [Mainichi Contemporary Art Exhibition], Concour Award (1966). One of Yoshida’s most important works from the Gutai era, Bisexual Flower (1969), first shown at the World Expo in Osaka, Japan in 1970, has been exhibited in many Gutai retrospectives, most recently in Gutai: Splended Playground at the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in 2013.

Also found this [7] - it's a video lecture on his work that may work as an External link.

And last but not least, and not from a reliable source, but it seems he also won a world record for doing 10,507 non-stop push-ups if it's the same Minoru Yoshida. [8]. With a reliable source, that would be a dandy bit of trivia. Netherzone (talk) 04:35, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

I kept seeing the pushup fact! Couldn't figure out if it was real or not. I will dig around and start to bulk up. Thank you as always for all of your help and guidance. Chainsawpunk (talk) 18:28, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

@Netherzone: I keep finding competing facts on the push up record... some sources say it was a different Minoru Yoshida some sources claim it was him Chainsawpunk (talk) 14:37, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

It should probably be left out then. Netherzone (talk) 19:19, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Unless we can find a really solid source. Netherzone (talk) 21:38, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasmin Sian has been accepted

Jasmin Sian, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amy Brener (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amy Brener and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:01, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wunnatuckquannumou (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wunnatuckquannumou and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Emily Adams Bode Aujla has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Emily Adams Bode Aujla. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 08:05, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

@Hoary Hi! I'm not sure how to reply to your comment on the draft page. My logic for why there should be a separate page for EABA is because I noticed other brands with separate pages for designers, and under the assumption that the pages would further distinguish themselves as the brand grows/changes. I tried to stick mostly to her professional life, but there are some articles in vogue and other fashion magazines I had trouble accessing behind a paywall that talk about her in a more personal light - if you give me some time I will try to access these and beef up this section so as to make the two pages more distinct and offer different information on this page.. But if you think it's redundant/a lost cause I can just delete it. Let me know Chainsawpunk (talk) 15:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

For those other pairs (article about a company named after its designer or boss plus article about that person), perhaps the person is additionally notable for work outside that one company. (In particular, I believe that a number of designers work rather inconspicuously within well-established companies, then become more conspicuous within these, and only later form their own companies or have companies/brands named after them. Others primarily work for their brands but also do things on the side, as it were.) But my knowledge of the fashion business (and fashion) is close to non-existent. How about asking for advice at WT:WikiProject Fashion? -- Hoary (talk) 22:20, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stenogale has been accepted

Stenogale, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 20:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

@Chainsawpunk feel free to add some appropriate categories. Qcne (talk) 20:24, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wunnatuckquannumou (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wunnatuckquannumou and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 08:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Catalina Ouyang has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Catalina Ouyang. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 23:33, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Catalina Ouyang has been accepted

Catalina Ouyang, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 00:26, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Named references

While making these edits, I couldn't help but infer that you'd somehow misunderstood named references. I recommend that you (re)read this: it should save you time and effort. -- Hoary (talk) 21:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Chainsawpunk (talk) 14:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karu Research has been accepted

Karu Research, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 18:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Adams Bode Aujla has been accepted

Emily Adams Bode Aujla, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 21:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kartik Kumra (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kartik Kumra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 12:28, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Askamaboo has been accepted

Askamaboo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 01:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss Gay Caribbean (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miss Gay Caribbean and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 13:43, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barragán (fashion brand) (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barragán (fashion brand) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex McCord (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alex McCord and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Wunnatuckquannumou

Hello, Chainsawpunk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wunnatuckquannumou, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Kartik Research for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kartik Research is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kartik Research until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lordofhunter (talk) 04:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Barragán (fashion brand)

Hello, Chainsawpunk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Barragán (fashion brand), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kartik Kumra

Hello, Chainsawpunk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kartik Kumra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Miss Gay Caribbean

Hello, Chainsawpunk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Miss Gay Caribbean".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)