Camdenmaine, you are invited to the Teahouse edit

 

Hi Camdenmaine! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Camdenmaine. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by TheOriginalSoni (talk) 11:56, 31 May 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply
 
Hello, Camdenmaine. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#Justifying_inclusion_in_the_Commons.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speedy deletion nomination of Tim Lister edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tim Lister, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:01, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tim Lister for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim Lister is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Lister until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, in case the above leaves you none the wiser about what to do, the key thing is to provide sources that are reliable, independent of Lister, and that show he is the subject of substantial attention. Thus, a brief mention in a listing that he is giving a talk does not qualify; nor does anything in a blog (unless by a journalist on his/her newspaper's website); nor does anything written by Lister himself; nor does a passing mention in a serious article. What does qualify is a discussion of his work in an independent book, journal article, conference paper, or institution's website. About three such sources would save the article. Hope this helps. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:24, 26 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. It does help. I have added two more such citations and will keep working while deliberation goes on. As an aside, I'm a relative novice at editing and very much impressed with how these deliberations work. Whatever the outcome, the process strikes me as fair and fairly administered. Camdenmaine (talk) 13:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Douglas H. Chadwick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Thanks, I definitely missed this nuance. Have fixed. Camdenmaine (talk) 13:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Camdenmaine. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by theonesean 15:42, 5 October 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Camdenmaine. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by theonesean 15:42, 5 October 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply
 
Hello, Camdenmaine. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

October 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Berlin Conference may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 15, 1884 at Bismarck's official residence on Wilhelmstrasse (site of the [Congress of Berlin]] six years earlier).<ref>Louis, Wm. Roger. ''Ends of British Imperialism: The Scramble for Empire,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:11, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Peter Hruschka moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Peter Hruschka. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Theroadislong (talk) 13:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Peter Hruschka has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peter Hruschka. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Robertson (software engineer) (April 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 13:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply