Hello Calvingao, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Ideogram 03:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help


Please consider joining WP:CHINA. --Ideogram 03:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Propaganda isn't allowed

edit

I know you just love China, but Wikipedia is not the place for propaganda. I deleted that section of the Gorges dam because it is a copy from a copyrighted site. It is also hugely biased to your country. The other section I changed because they are completely biased and Wikipedia in my opinion should be unbiased (This is really biased). Even if it makes your shity ass country look even worse to live in. The dam has its problems and is an environmental issue. I am not against the dam of China, just think Wikipedia should be unbiased, not a place of propaganda. Also, the sections I edited/deleted had Chinese gov. websites as the only sources. The Chinese gov. websites are not unbiased and don't constitute a source unless there is an alternative view website to go along with them. Please don't undo my edits as they are there to make Wikipedia unbiased and based upon facts (ones from China don't always constitute facts as China uses propaganda to a degree). Please don't keep changing this just because you don't like what it says. Too bad. I bet you undo edits on the dams criticism page as well. Get use to it. China isn't all perfect and by the way their economy isn't all booming. Oh, and one last thing, free tibet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.176.211.177 (talk) 04:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:Donghuanlijiao.JPG

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Donghuanlijiao.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Donghuanlugaojia.JPG

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Donghuanlugaojia.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

edit

Hi Calvingao. You made some great contributions on energy related issues. I thought you might like to be aware of the opportunity to contribute to the energy portal. If you are able to help and wish to show your support (and to automatically add yourself to the list of Wikipedians plugged into the Energy Portal), you might also like to paste one of these user boxes onto your user page (according to your colour preference!):

Paste this text... ...to get this tag
{{User_energy_portal_blue}}
 This user is plugged into the Energy Portal. 
{{User_energy_portal_red}}
 This user is plugged into the Energy Portal. 
{{User_energy_portal_blaze}}
 This user is plugged into the Energy Portal. 

Beagel (talk) 20:35, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Three Gorges Dam

edit

Hi Calvingao. For the GA status, the Three Gorges Dam needs better references. Maybe you could help to find missing references? Thank you in advance. Beagel (talk) 10:15, 19 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

ref section

edit

Hi. Don't forget to insert the actual reference seciton into articles that you create. Otherwise, the reference doesn't show up in the article. Best, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:56, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, you're getting there, but still not perfect. Check out the edits that I do to your articles. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Three gorges dam project lay out.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Three gorges dam project lay out.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Three gorges dam project lay out.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. MER-C 11:54, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Three Gorges Dam

edit

Three Gorges Dam has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. Tom B (talk) 14:01, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of List of largest hydroelectric power stations

edit

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of largest hydroelectric power stations, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of largest hydroelectric power stations. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rehman(+) 05:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC) Reply

 
Hello, Calvingao. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of largest hydroelectric power stations.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File:Three gorges dam annual power output.JPG

edit

Hello Calvingao,

I would like to create an updated version vector version with 2013 data. Unfortunately I can't understand Chinese. May you help me finding the data?--Kopiersperre (talk) 12:36, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Calvingao. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of countries by renewable electricity production for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of countries by renewable electricity production is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries by renewable electricity production until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply