Wikipedia

User talk:Cassiopeia/Archive 21

< User talk:Cassiopeia
(Redirected from User talk:CASSIOPEIA/Archive 21)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by CASSIOPEIA in topic Thank You For Reviewing My Article CASSIOPEIA
Archive 15 ← Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 → Archive 25

Draft:Khabeeruddin Ahmed

Latest comment: 4 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Request for feedback on Draft:Khabeeruddin Ahmed Afzal tc8 (talk) 16:12, 29 April 2019 (UTC) Afzal tc8

I had a lengthy conversation today with two persons on live help. We faced a difficulty, when we presented a primary form of evidence on Khabeeruddin's education. WiKi helpers wanted secondary information. In other words, school record is not good to Wiki, a degree must show on a news article or a book. We were surprised, as a news article doesn't prove a degree.

Most information on Khabeeruddin will come from primary sources. For example, from Assembly Chamber records, court room records etc. Rarely, those records will say Khabeeruddin many times, even though it could be implied that he was a primary person. In fact those will be best information available on the subject. Yet, Wiki has problem with primary source.

Due to these difficulties, we were advised to publish our findings on a newspaper or on a scholarly print first. So, this appear to be a good direction as was suggested by the live helper. We have no problem with that.

However, before removing the article completely, we have deleted areas of text where we are still trying to locate original sources. Notice that, the man was an assemblyman, and the countries are/were modern day England and India, with good record keeping. So, finding original sources appear to be a matter of time only.

Nevertheless, we are willing to voluntarily delete the article for now, if that is what preferred. Need some feedback at this point, on our voluntary plan to remove the article.

If you respond quickly, we will remove quickly. Thank you.

Afzal tc8 (talk) 21:09, 29 April 2019 (UTC) Afzal tc8

Afzal tc8 Greetings. When you refered to "two persons on live help", what live chat you were referring to and who are these two persons? Also when you referred to "We faced a difficulty" ; " we were advised to publish our findings on a newspaper...." who are we you were referring to? Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi CASSIOPEIA - Thank you!! Answers follow - A click on the 'live help' on Draft:Khabeeruddin Ahmed inside your first comment took us to: 

 Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer
 Live Help
 Connect to English Wikipedia help channel

The conversations took place inside the live English Wikipedia help channel yesterday. One of the two entities was a person or entity named 'Dragonfly6-7'. Trying to remember the name of the other entity or person. That name I think had four characters that started with an 'H'. Those two entities appeared as working together, in a coordinated. The person H... started first, but as soon as Dragonfly6-7 started conversation, H... dropped out without responding. Dragonfly6-7 said, if I voluntarily deleted the draft by May 31, nothing would happen to me. He then gave me the attributes for voluntary deletion. Dragonfly6-7 gave some valuable feedback on the actual content. Those feedbacks that made sense to me have been incorporated in the draft since yesterday. By the way, Dragonfly6-7 had difficulty in recognizing Simla or what relation it had to Rajshahi (Muslim) constituency in 1922. Nevertheless, wise enough on history of that part to suggest deletion of the draft.

"We faced a difficulty" - 'We' means I, alone. In general, anywhere you see "we" in my writing that refers to me and relates to this particular draft, "we" means I alone.

Afzal tc8 (talk) 15:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC) Afzal tc8

Afzal tc8 Good day. Ok thank you for the info.I asked because if the communication is on one of the "help desks" then I could look at the history diff to see what was discussed, but since it is on IRC that is a live chat. Do address yourself as "I" instead of "We" as Wiki account is for one user only. Do note if we do not know the gender of the editor, we would address the editor as "them/they/their" in Wikipedia. Let me set out by outlining the requirements for a subject to merit a page in Wikipedia. Firstly, the subject needs to be notable (worthy to note) (example, if you are a minor league basketball player in Malawi then you are not notable, but if you played in MBA league then you are notable). Secondly, the content claimed needs to be supported by (i) significant coverage (at least 3 and up) (ii) independent, reliable sources ( note sources need to be both independent and reliable) where by (iii) the sources "directly" talk about the subject in length and in depth and not only passing mentioned for verification. (3) The content need to be written in neutral point of view and free of (4) copyright infringement and (5) WP:PROMOTION and puffery words.
Sources which are not independent can NOT be contribute to the notability of the subject but they could be the supplement source for certain information of the subject such as education and some basic background of subject life for these are NOT the information would pass the notability requirement anyway. However, info of such info taken from the not independent could only make up a portion of the content and not dominate majority of the content. The important point here is that he was a politician or he was well known enough that many sources wrote/ still mention about him. Source either print or digital from newspaper, books or reliable journal are good sources. By the way the sources could be in any languages (however, if the print sources is in other languages than it would be hard for reviewers to get it translated). The draft copy would be stay in the Wikipedia system for 6 months before it gets deleted.
I have a brief read, the format of the page might need to rearrange or rework. You need a MOS:LEAD section (introduction) then the body section with subsections such as "Background", "Political career", "Personal life" and etc. Pls check out other biography page under the WP:GA and see how it is written. Also there are detail and length information which he associate which I think it should pear down as the article is about the subject and it should talk about the subject. I will leave the draft for other reviewer to review the page as I have done twice and other reviewer might/could provide additional comments. Hope the above help. Let me know if anything else I could help. cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk)
Hi CASSIOPEIA - Thank you for an excellent feedback! In addition, yesterday I have identified a database of Assembly Chamber records with many reference to Khabeeruddin, some directly relating to questions he asked and the house speaker's answer. Those whole sections would fit within the requirements you are talking about.
I have taken a note of your comments, and now carefully using them for the next edit. Will get back shortly. Thank you again.
Afzal tc8, Glad that I would help and pop back here if you have further questions. Happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:17, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi CASSIOPEIA: I took out much of the content in the last revisions. Please don't be surprised. I will return shortly. Thank you for your patience. 108.89.32.9 (talk) 17:56, 5 May 2019 (UTC) Afzal tc8

Can You Review My other pages , please

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The pages you need to review are Chambal (2019 movie) and Soojidara (2019 film). Please review these two pages. Please— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shreyashv26 (talk • contribs) 03:15, May 4, 2019 (UTC)

Shreyashv26, good day Chambal (2019 movie) review. Soojidara (2019 film) needs one more independent reliable source. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~).. thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:32, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

CVUA

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, I've finished the latest assignment on CVUA. So you can check it out to tell me how I am progressing. THEFlint Shrubwood (talk) 00:21, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

THEFlint Shrubwood   Done. You could ping me on the subpage next time. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:57, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #363

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Discussions
    • Closed request for adminship: BRPever, welcome on board!

You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.


Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Lea Lacroix (WMDE) 14:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-19

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Problems

  • Special:Watchlist can show the wrong information. It does not always show which edits are read and which are unread. The developers are working on solving the problem. [1]

Changes later this week

  •   The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 7 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 8 May. It will be on all wikis from 9 May (calendar).

Meetings

  •     You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 8 May at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

16:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Question about Draft articl Draft:Roy López Molina

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Sorry to bother you CASSIOPEIA! Are you the reviewer of this article? -->https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Roy_L%C3%B3pez_Molina Thanks! --Arakisama (talk) 05:55, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Arakisama Greetings. I am one of the AfC reviewers. I was thinking to review the article that is the reason I marked the article under review and decide not to review this article and worked on other AfC article. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:12, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind replay! --Arakisama (talk) 06:22, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Approve Saddleworth Rangers

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, as advised I have updated the page Saddleworth Rangers with sources and citations that I hope satisfy the requirements. The page has been in draft for 3 months now. Thanks Marksairey (talk) 11:14, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Marksairey Greetings. I have reviewed the article and removed some puffer words and unsourced content. It is on the borderline of meeting notability guidelines, that means, the article might be nominated for deleted if the notability is not strentgthen further. What you could do is to add more WP:SECONDARY, reliable sources about the club and where citations needed section. Pls click on the orange words and select which subject they should be linked to. Happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:34, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
CASSIOPEIA Thanks very much for all your help and advice, I continue to learn about editing.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Marksairey (talk • contribs) 22:51, May 7, 2019 (UTC)
Marksairey welcome. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:53, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Lex Lüpke (Alexander Lüpke, born May 9th, 1980 in Hofheim, Germany) is a German evangelist entrepreneur, game designer, gaming consultant, inventor and entertainer.

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello CASSIOPEIA,

I saw you deleted my article on Lex Lüpke. I would like to edit it according to guidelines, so it can be safely posted. Please give me a review on reasons why the page was deleted and what needs to be changed.

Best regards, Celcoson— Preceding unsigned comment added by Celcoson (talk • contribs) 21:45, May 8, 2019 (UTC)

@Celcoson: Hi. Do you work for an entity related to Lex Lüpke? Could you declare a conflict of interest regarding this? (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Chris Troutman (talk) 12:07, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Celcoson Greetings. The draft page was deleted because of it was an ambiguous advertising or promotion article - see here Wikipedia is a encyclopedia and the requirements for an article to be merit a page in Wikipedia (1) the subject need to be notable. (2) the content claimed need to be supported by (i) multiple (ii) independent (secondary source) (iii)reliable sources and the sources need to talk about the subject (iv)"directly" and not merely passing mentioned. (3) The content need to be free of copyright infringement and (4) written in neutral point of view without promote and using andy puffing words. Pls read WP:Your First Article and WP:GOLDENRULE. Let me know if anything else I could help and pls reply the question posted by Chris Troutan above in my talkpage but do ping the user.Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~).. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:11, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Request on 13:30:08, 8 May 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Seriousmoon

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion


Can you tell me why this article do not meet the requirements?

Seriousmoon (talk) 13:30, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Seriousmoon Greetings. Pls see the comments on the grey panel on top of the page the draft page, and click on the blue highlighted texts for details info. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:42, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Request on 04:02:46, 8 May 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Branbfh


Please, please , please

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, CASSIOPEIA

I try to create new page (dr.kamol) by translate from thai wiki page please advice me.

thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Branbfh (talk • contribs) 14:02, May 8, 2019 (UTC)

Branbfh Greetings. Reviewed and declined. See comments on the draft page. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~).. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:39, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Branbfh (talk) 07:30, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Please Please - Soojidara (2019 film)

Latest comment: 4 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Please can you review my page soojidara (2019 film) page. Please.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shreyashv26 (talk • contribs) 23:06, May 10, 2019 (UTC)

Shreyashv26 Greetings, Pls create new section for new subject matter. Pls include when the film in production and when it will be released in cinema with respectively inline citation. Once you have done that, pop back here and let me know. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~).. thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:27, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Yes everything has been done you can review it.Shreyashv26 (talk) 14:18, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Shreyashv26, the source - see [2] does not indicate the released date. Pls rework and again please Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~).. thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk)
I think so that is not so much required . So you please review it. If there is any changes needed I will do it afterwards . you review it first please.Shreyashv26 (talk) 14:18, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Shreyashv26 If a film is not in production or would be release than it is NOT notable and would not merit a page in Wikipeida. AGAIN, this is the 4th times Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~).. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:11, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Now everything is done please review it madamShreyashv26 (talk) 14:21, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Shreyashv26, Under the "Release and Critical reception" - "The film is being released on 10th May 2019 all over Karnataka and it is being released in around 180 centers in the state.[6]" and the source #6 - this one [3] does not indicate the content claimed. Pls provide source (inline citation). Thank you for signing your post and add additional " : " (one space indentatin to the right - this is the Wikipedia communication protocol) from this message of mine when you reply. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:40, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Now it is corrected so you please review it fast. Please PLEASE . Shreyashv26 (talk) 14:45, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Shreyashv26, Pls slow down and read my message again. You have removed some content but you have yet to provide any source to support the release date. Please provide the source (inline citation). Please add additional " : " (one space indentatin to the right - this is the Wikipedia communication protocol) from this message of mine when you reply. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:55, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

A award for you

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
 The Good Friend Award
Thank you very much for the training in CVUA. I am very thankful for your help and training me the aspects of Counter-vandalism. You trained me lot about it. Thank you so much. Thanks. PATH SLOPU 14:14, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Barnstars for you

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion
  The Original Barnstar
This is for your valuable efforts in contributing to Wikipedia PATH SLOPU 14:16, 11 May 2019 (UTC)


  The Guidance Barnstar
This is for your guidance and leading gave in CVUA. I am very thankful for your help Counter-vandalism. You trained me lot about it. Thank you very much. PATH SLOPU 14:16, 11 May 2019 (UTC)


  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
This is for your valuable efforts for reverting and protecting enwiki from Vandalism PATH SLOPU 14:16, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
  The Invisible Barnstar
This is for your valuable efforts for contributing to Wikipedia without seeking any recognition or reward. PATH SLOPU 14:16, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  CASSIOPEIA Award
This is for your help and training given to me. Be the eternal light to others like the the stars in CASSIOPEIA. Thanks. PATH SLOPU 14:23, 11 May 2019 (UTC)


Path slopu Appreciate your kind gesture and award me with all the barnstars. CASSIOPEIA barnstar is particularly special. You sure do know your Greek mythology and constellation. Once again thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:17, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Be my mentor

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello can you please train me in anti-vandalism. Thank you. Decepti Brine (talk) 17:09, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Decepti Brine Greetings. May I know why you want to learn about couter-vandalism and enroll to CVUA program? CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:40, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
I encounter vandalism in many pages but cannot change it. Thus learnung about it can make me understand the true nature of vandalism and help wiki by changing it. Also it might enable me to spot more vandalism and learn.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Decepti Brine (talk • contribs) 22:20, May 12, 2019 (UTC)
Please.Decepti Brine (talk) 14:30, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Decepti Brine Thank you for enthusiasm and willing to help; however, upon checking, you made 15 mainspace edits of a total 41 edits todate. 5 of the 15 mainspace edits are deem disruptive / vandalism. (1) you remove the source that support the content of the page - see 1 (pls add back the source), (2) adding a big chunk of unsourced content - see 2 (pls remove them unless you have independent, reliable sources to support it), (3) remove the source - see 3 (pls add back the source), (4) remove garden stub to smiley thank you tag - see 4 (pls revert your own edit) and (5) remove unreferenced tag without adding any references to the page - see 5 (pls revert your own edit). This indicated you dont understand to how to make correct/constructive edits in Wikipedia yet. Also, if you think the page names need to change, pls first discuss it on the article talk page. I suggest you to edits constructively and learn by reading the welcome links in your talk page, familiar yourself what should be done and want is should not (no disruptive/vandalism edits) for 6 more month or another few thousand edits, before looking into helping in counter vandalism. If you not sure about editing you could place your questions on WP:Teahouse and there are many friendly, helpful editors to answer your questions. In addition, I suggest you to remove your personal email address on your user page and if you want anyone could contact you via email, then put your email address on "Email options" on "User Profile" tab at your "Preferences" Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:44, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

short description

Latest comment: 4 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hi CASSIOPEIA. Please can you mark these edits as minor, so I can filter them out of my watchlist? Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:15, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Lugnuts Greetings. The edit summary is generated automatically as I use short description scripts. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:20, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Ahh, rats! Was hoping there would be a way to stop the flooding. OK, no worries. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:33, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Lugnuts just done with AUS boxers, not sure this is the watchlist you referred to. If it is then should be no more flooding but if your watchlists are boxers in general then thousands more will come your way in next 2 weeks. Just a head up. cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:45, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks - I'll see if the script can be updated. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:49, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Lugnuts check with Pbsouthwood, person in-charge of shortdesc WikiPoject. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:56, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

question about improving an article Crocodile Skin

((crocodile skin)) hi CASSIOPEIA could you please tell me how I can improve the article I have been working on which is currently rated B class? Thanks!(Lu110319cy 12:45, 13 May 2019 (UTC))

Lu110319cy Good'y. For a new editor who writes their first article and the article is marked as class B is considered very good. You did a great job! See here Wikipedia:Content assessment for how the content assessment is rated and to improve the article to A or GA class you might want to look at the articles HERE. Thank you for your contribution and happy editing.13:08, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #364

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • Finish renaming WikibaseSchema to EntitySchema
    • Investigate how to port Wikibase Selenium tests from Ruby to Node.js (phab:T221638)
    • Include a clear two step process in shex simple tool (phab:T221612)
    • Fix the "edit visually" on the Query Service interface (phab:T222181)
    • More work on wb_terms redesign (see documentation on phab:T221764)
    • More work on mobile termbox
    • Investigate on a bug found on wbeditentity not removing all aliases (phab:T203337)
    • Getting ready for the Wikimedia hackathon

You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.


Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Lea Lacroix (WMDE) 15:08, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-20

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Changes later this week

  •   The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 14 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 15 May. It will be on all wikis from 16 May (calendar).

Meetings

  •     You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 15 May at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

00:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Sports Authority of Andhra Pradesh

Latest comment: 4 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, thank you for moving Draft:Sports Authority of Andhra Pradesh into draftspace. Have been working on it (cleaning up copy, creating a structure, attempting an NPOV and adding references) as I work my way down the page. Would appreciate a review from you when you have time. Meanwhile the original page creator submitted the draft for Afc consideration - I believe the remaining sections (Projects/SAAP Projects downwards) will be done in a day or two, and we should wait until then to submit. Reverted the template to not submitted but wanted your help to remove it from the consideration queue if it still somehow is in there. Sdsouza (talk) 08:48, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Sdsouza Greetings. May I know who are "we" you referred to on your message above? CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:54, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
CASSIOPEIA The "we" meant editors here. Half the article is now cleaned up and citations done (i think), the other half still looks incomplete (to me). Thanks! Sdsouza (talk) 09:34, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Sdsouza how many of "we" are there? Are you guys working for Sports Authority of Andhra Pradesh? CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:36, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
CASSIOPEIA am not sure about the original page creator (don't know them), but I don't work for SAAP. The "we" meant editors in general here at Wikipedia - not a group of editors that I am part of. Just to be clear, here's the diff from when I started editing to its current state: diff. Sdsouza (talk) 09:39, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Sdsouza If you look at the history log here, there is only 4 editors in total, the creator, you, I and the other is also a reviewer. So pls use "I" if you refer just yourself.. Pls note that in Wikipedia, we use gender neutral pronounce when we dont know the gender of the editor, instead of he/she, him/her, his/hers we use they/them/their. I asked the question because Wikipedia account is for only one user. Pls note that the draft at the present stage written more like a company broucher or profile in web site. Pls refer to other sport article such as FIFA. Reduce the roles/function down to one sentence and remove mission. Remove all the project and state only the most important ones. Pls read up WP:Your First Article and WP:GOLDENRULE to familiar yourself on how to write an article and the requirement in Wikipedia. Take you time to rewrite as the draft article will be in Wikipedia system for 6 months prior deletion if no submission is made. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:51, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
CASSIOPEIA Glad you agree with what I said at the beginning of this section: the draft is not ready for submission. As for your advice on using gender neutral pronouns, am wondering what in my posts here prompted you to bring it up. I used a single pronoun as far as I can make out - them (apart from I and you, I mean). Thanks again! Sdsouza (talk) 10:17, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Sdsouza I mentioned as I dont want you to get confused if I use "they/them/ther" to refer to an editor (singular). CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:21, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Why did you remove my edit to Polystation

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey dude, I actually know Reggie personally and I can assure you all the information I added is completely true, and I have physical evidence to prove it— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.224.234.138 (talk) 22:57, May 16, 2019 (UTC)

24.224.234.138 Greetings. I have left a message to you on your talk page and indicated the reason - you didnt provide a independent, reliable sources. Since you know Reggie personally, it is not advised to edit the affected page as you have a conflict of interest. You could provide source and request for other editor to edit for you by stating it on the article talk page. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:04, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Colour boxes

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Just wondering why you removed the colour boxes ? Leighton94 (talk) 13:49, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Leighton94 Greetings. Pls see Section:Parameters and Example. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:01, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.18

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello Cassiopeia,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

  • Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
  • Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News
Discussions of interest

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

CASSIOPEIA moved page Kōji Chikamoto to Draft:Kōji Chikamoto without leaving a redirect: Undersourced, incubate in draftspace

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I added sources to the article, and it's ready for your review. Thank you! :)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mika chan2005 (talk • contribs) 13:03, May 18, 2019 (UTC)

Hi Mika chan2005, good day. Reviewed and accepted. You could find the article here - Kōji Chikamoto. Thank you for your contribution and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:01, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Ref errors

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, with this edit, a ref was missing the closing '>'. Please take care with these... I have come across some others left by you in recent weeks. Using preview or even looking at the page after saving would have revealed the large angry ref-error message. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 11:19, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Eagleash Greetings. Left over the ">" thanks for informing and helping. Appreciate it. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:43, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Vandalism Academy

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, I saw your name as a trainer at Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy I'm interested in learning how to fight vandalism and more in-depth learning of Vandalism on WIkipedia, I also checked your contributions, It's nice to see you're nice to other users. Please Train me --Siddharth Talk To Me!! 18:12, 18 May 2019 (UTC)


SidPedian Good day and thank you for interested in fighting vandalism in Wikipedia. Pls have a look the "Goals" and "Syllabus" sections below to understand the requirements needed at the end of the course in order to graduate from CVSCHOOL. Secondly, please note that there are many editors who were interested in counter vandalism course and abundant the program mid way due to lack of anticipation of the amount of efforts/time needed in reading the program material, doing assigned "homework" and exams requirements . The program has no timeline set, as the editor would progress through the course work at their own time. Generally, it would take an editor 1.5-2 months to finish the course. So do prepare yourself for lots of reading and homework if you intend to proceed with the program. As of today, you have edited 106 mainspace - see HERE and the requirement for a user to enroll into the program is that (1) the user has contributed at least 200 edits to MAINSPACE and (2) a good contributor (no vandalism edits , disruptive edits or have not been blocked in last 6 months). Your time spent in Wikipedia for the last few weeks shows that you could be achieve 200 mainspace in next 2 weeks. Come back if you are still interested after you have contributed to at least 200 mainspace edits, and also include the reason why you are interested in the program and become a vandal fighter in Wikipedia.


Goals

If you're new and/or inexperienced, before embarking on a Counter-Vandalism training programme, you should be able to demonstrate that you have already mastered the basic principles of editing the encyclopedia and contributed at least 200 edits to MAINSPACE. If you have previously been warned or requested to follow guidelines, you should have demonstrated that you have addressed these issues.

When you have shown through training that you have mastered the principles of Counter-Vandalism and can apply them with accuracy, and can communicate correctly and effectively with new users of all kinds you may be able to apply for permission to use restricted tools, such as, for example Rollback, and STiki that will enable you to semi-automate the process, while understanding that speed alone is not essential - the target is accuracy. When you have achieved these goals, you can display the {{User CVU0-en}} userbox on your user page.

Syllabus

Competency Fail Pass
Knowledge and Understanding of Concepts

Able to correctly define and describe:

  • Cannot describe these concepts at a comprehensible level.
  • Unable to differentiate the difference between vandalism and good faith edits
  • Does not understand the key purpose of reverting vandalism
  • Can concisely and elaborately describe each of these concepts.
  • Can describe the proper use of warning templates and how to correctly make an AIV submission.
Critical Thinking

Able to review historical reversions and identify whether such reversion were correctly categorized

Correctly assessed fewer than 85% of the examples provided by their instructor. Correctly assessed at least 85% of the examples provided by their instructor.
Communication

Able to effectively communicate with other editors regarding reversions

Communicates inconsistently with editors via talk page comments or in response to editors who question or challenge their reversions. Communicates in a polite and professional manner and avoids biting other editors and harsh comments.
Application

Effectively applies the concepts and tools of vandalism fighting in a productive and proficient manner.

  • Cannot consistently revert vandalized pages correctly.
  • Is inconsistent in use of warning on user talk pages or uses incorrect warning templates
  • Has reverted fewer than 50 instances of vandalism in the two weeks prior to graduation – or – has reverted more than 50 instances of vandalism with a high degree of incorrect reversions.
  • Demonstrates proficiency in performing reversions, either manually or with a tool (Twinkle, etc.).
  • Consistently leaves the correct messages on vandal’s talk page explaining the reversion, and is able to further explain the vandal their reasoning behind the reversion if prompted.
  • Has accurately reverted at least 50 instances of vandalism in the two weeks prior to graduation.
At the meantime, if you have not finished WP:The Wikipedia Adventure program, I do suggest you to do so as there are many valuable info and exercises which would help you to understand some fundamental info and requirements as a good contributor in Wikipedia. If you have any other questions or anything I could help, please let me know. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:08, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank You For Reviewing My Article CASSIOPEIA

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  The Articles for Creation barnstar
Dear CASSIOPEIA (talk), thank you so much for your speedy reviewing of my new article J. Philip Vincent (talk). I have never seen such quick and effective work on Wikipedia before. I really admire your works as a Wikipedian. Please accept my Articles for Creations Barnster as my token of appreciation to you. Once again, thank you very much.

from Mathew Anderson (talk)

Mathewanderson7232 Appreciate the barnstar and thank you for your contribution. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:37, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cassiopeia/Archive_21&oldid=1073328289"