BlastBeat4

BlastBeat4, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi BlastBeat4! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, BlastBeat4. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Gtwfan52 (talk) 04:36, 25 December 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your submission at Articles for creation

Template:Black Anvil, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

avs5221^{(talk|contrib)} 06:07, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Sources for bands

Hi BlastBeat. Saw that Gtwfan already answered your question on the Teahouse Q&A board. Hope that's the info you needed! Welcome to Wikipedia, and be sure to drop by the Teahouse again and see us sometime. Cheers, - J-Mo ^{Talk to Me} _{Email Me} 20:29, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

I also found a metal news site that shows their tweets and it said the same thing. Is that reliable for a source BlastBeat4 (talk) 20:30, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Unfortunately, there's seldom a single, definitive answer to that question :) You might read our guideline on identifying reliable sources, or the reliable sources section of the verifiability policy. But in the end it's up to you (and other editors) to decide whether this particular source is reliable. If you're not sure, I think you should ask again on the Teahouse questions page. Be sure to provide a link to both your article draft and the source you want to cite. Good luck! - J-Mo ^{Talk to Me} _{Email Me} 21:17, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, BlastBeat4. You have new messages at Gtwfan52's talk page.
Message added 05:20, 27 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:20, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, BlastBeat4. You have new messages at Gtwfan52's talk page.
Message added 22:45, 28 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gtwfan52 (talk) 22:45, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Attack Attack!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keyboard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Black Anvil

I think it is fine. Just be advised that AfC is usually pretty backlogged. It may take a week to 10 days. Gtwfan52 (talk) 03:30, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you

		The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar
		For your concern with doing it the right way on your first article. Welcome to the corp of Wikipedia editors! Gtwfan52 (talk) 08:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Black Anvil.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Andrew³²⁷ 04:38, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Eh...

...what in the world were you thinking when you did this? Drmies (talk) 14:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Black Anvil

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Black Anvil concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Black Anvil, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Black Anvil

Hello BlastBeat4. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Black Anvil".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Black Anvil}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:03, 1 January 2014 (UTC)