Wikipedia

User talk:Benjwong/Archive 6

< User talk:Benjwong
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Arilang1234 in topic Hi
Archive 1←Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8

Tai-pop

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Tai-pop 台語/閩南歌 (also known as Minnan pop or Hokkien) or Hokkien pop is currently a thriving business in Taiwan and has also spreaded to South East Asia, where a large population of Hokkien-speakers are. It's classified as a C-pop genre and the main production center is based in Taiwan.

Please do not delete the entry under C-pop table.

(Yhjow (talk) 09:44, 30 August 2010 (UTC))

I am not going to revert it anymore. But how about some sources if you are that positive. Benjwong (talk) 01:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Yuen Wai-hung

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

I have nominated Yuen Wai-hung, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuen Wai-hung. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WWGB (talk) 11:03, 3 May 2010 (UTC)


Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 edits

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hi Benjwong. Good luck with the article above. If you could offer me some feedback on your reasons for reverting my edits to the article noted above I would appreciate it. Is it the content, placement, style, etc., that you object to. Thanks. MJE519 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mje519 (talk • contribs) 13:07, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

That entire paragraph can go two ways. You can say the exact opposite. Please provide some sources. Benjwong (talk) 02:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Please note the reference is moved to the original content, not the whole fact. English is my native language thank you very much. -WikiSkeptic (talk) 15:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Admin Kwami

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, I was wondering if you are interested in starting a Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct/Creation (WP:RFC/U:Admin) on Kwamikagami (talk · contribs) , seeing as Kwami again unilaterally moved the Cantonese article after a WP:RM without any notice or reason, on the April 23rd, setting off another revert/rename cycle.

I myself cannot, since I am an IP user and do not have page creation rights.

I have also asked user:Colipon and user:Ohconfucius on this issue.

76.66.193.224 (talk) 04:59, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Someone challenging Labour unrest article

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Talk:2010 China Labour unrest. If you have time please review and give your views. Colipon+(Talk) 11:56, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:59, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2010 Legislative Council Building graffiti incident

Latest comment: 14 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
 

The article 2010 Legislative Council Building graffiti incident has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't understand how putting graffiti on a building is worthy of a Wikipedia article.

Please expand on why this is significant.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mboverload@ 04:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

I won't AfD the article but I'm still trying to understand how this is important. People write on buildings all the time? --mboverload@ 04:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Please follow the recent political events in the region to better understand the scale of these graffiti and what it means. The incident is barely reported. Benjwong (talk) 04:52, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Could you put why put that in the article? If I'm not understanding then someone else may not either. Would make the article better. mboverload@ 05:41, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Should we put in the article that anti-communist activities is seriously not allowed in the territory? What are you looking for? What is the article missing. You cannot delete articles if you don't understand it. I don't understand alot of articles on wiki. There are thousands of article in far worse conditions than this. Benjwong (talk) 05:46, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
I expanded on the intro. Hopefully it makes more sense to the general readers not following the political events. Benjwong (talk) 05:56, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Yes, thank you. Sorry for being so terse =(. Thanks for making a new article. --mboverload@ 05:57, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

A little favour to ask

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Benjwong! It has been a long time, but I forgot the process in putting that 25s music sample for a song on wikipedia. Can give me a quick crash course again by any chance? Thank you so much, Sifu! Dengero (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi, just convert your CD with itunes or some tools to wav. There are many freeware programs that can edit wav files to 25s. Then convert your wav to ogg with more freeware. Upload the ogg file to wiki afterwards. I am no sifu. Benjwong (talk) 01:46, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Nice work

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. You did a lot of nice work reverting the incorrect changes made by User:Douglas the Comeback Kid, so please accept...

 


The Barnstar of Diligence
For reverting a very large number of incorrect changes to articles related to Chinese names -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure if his changes were just through ignorance, but I do get the feeling he's editing from a particular political viewpoint (I see he also removed some pinyin and simplified Chinese naming - I've put them back). I have his contributions watched now and will check every day, and if he repeats any of this we can request admin intervention. Best regards -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

I was reverting due to non-convention, and not much else. Thanks for award. Benjwong (talk) 17:58, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of 1998 Manila blackmail incident for deletion

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

A discussion has begun about whether the article 1998 Manila blackmail incident, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1998 Manila blackmail incident until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Lambanog (talk) 18:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Cpop

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

it is perfectly legitimate to remove unsourced (and even sourced) hyperbole and personal opinion. I feel that removing crap with a machette is in fact good for the project in that we dont leave bad examples for the accumulation of more fancruft and original interpretations and commentary and content NOT acceptable under WP:BLP Active Banana ( bananaphone 00:26, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

I am continuing this over here. Benjwong (talk) 03:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Notes column,Order of fimography of Rajesh Khanna should be as follows

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

We need your help in making the rajesh khanna filmography in the order. I have put forward what needs to be changed and how similar it should be with the list i have pasted down and i hope u take in right spirit and make the changes happily..Help is needed as many unregistered people are putting wrong data.. .Total rajesh khanna films must 157 . No changes needed in column of actress,roles and directors and external links.

1)In notes column add the follwing details for the following films needs to be mentioned.


and 1982 – Winner Lions Club, New Delhi– Best Actor Award for Dard 1994 – Winner Russian Film Festival, Ujvegistan- Best Actor for Khudai and

Won
Nominated

2) but the following which are either missing from imbd or citwf were added me by me and are now missing......they are needed to be added back as they have been searched by me after watching those films and they are available in different sites and articles. ........... Sundara Satarkar (Marathi Movie -1981,Dushman Dost of 1981 Rekha and Reena Roy,Bayen Hath Ka Khel - Tina Munim of 1985,Hathyara (1977) - Special Appearance,Ayaash (1982) Rati Agnihotri - Special Appearance Shakti Samanta , and Dushman (1990) - Special Appearance Shakti Samanta... and the 1968 film reads Shrimanji in the film credits and not Srimanji,Raam tere kitne naam of 1985,Khoon Aur Paani of 1981 needs to be added in filmography.

3)1972 filmfare awards was won by Rajesh Khanna - Anand as Anand Saigal and the film was released in 1971 and Premnagar was nominated in 1975 filmfare awards and was released in 1974. 4)do not delete anything only add things. please ensure that the order of film release is as follows which is right..... 5)Kati Patang was released in 1971 and got nominated in 1972 filmfare awards as Rajesh Khanna - Kati Patang as Kamal Sinha and similarly Dushman and Amar Prem were released in 1972 and got nominated in 1973 held filmfare function and Aavishkar was released in 1974 and Khanna won in 1975. 6)The Year of the film release is perfectly laid down below please ensure filmography is in following ORDER and the spelling of the film is as follows...The filography as edited by you should be now modified as follows

respond in my talk page in case of queries....Shrik88music (talk) 18:26, 21 September 2010 (UTC)


i thought u would help us as u are awre of how quickly these deatils can be incorporated into it.hope u can do this in 10 mins these changesShrik88music (talk) 12:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:GordianWarriorTitle.jpg

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GordianWarriorTitle.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:13, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:GordianPilot.jpg

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GordianPilot.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:14, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:HavocinHeaven1964.jpg

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HavocinHeaven1964.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AshitaNoJoe.jpg

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AshitaNoJoe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 31 October 2010 (UTC)


Hi again

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please have a look at Talk:Boxer Rebellion if you are still interested in that subject. Arilang talk 02:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I am still interested. But it is too deep of an article to do now or anytime soon. Benjwong (talk) 06:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)


Orphaned non-free image File:GordianWarriorTitle.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GordianWarriorTitle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GordianPilot.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GordianPilot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed Tibetan naming conventions

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

A few months ago, I posted a new proposal for Tibetan naming conventions, i.e. conventions that can be used to determine the most appropriate titles for articles related to the Tibetan region. This came out of discussions about article titles on Talk:Qamdo and Talk:Lhoka (Shannan) Prefecture. I hope that discussions on the proposal's talk page will lead to consensus in favour of making these conventions official, but so far only a few editors have left comments. If you would be interested in taking a look at the proposed naming conventions and giving your opinion, I would definitely appreciate it. Thanks — Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 22:05, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

It maybe best to ask people from tibetan projects on this. Benjwong (talk) 06:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PlawresSanshiroPoster.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PlawresSanshiroPoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:18, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

References

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Please use the right way to add references, as instruct on Wikipedia:Citing sources. Use {{Cite news}} is the proper way to tackle this issue. Thank you. --Aleenf1 07:39, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

You can start a bot to change it the way you like. Benjwong (talk) 07:41, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
I have used this format for too long before there was a standard. Benjwong (talk) 07:44, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Indeed you have a good work, but when the word should have CAPS, you not to, and wrong wording too. --Aleenf1 08:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PlawresSanshiroCast.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PlawresSanshiroCast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 01:15, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GongQiuxia.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GongQiuxia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Standard Mandarin

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I noticed you have just commented on the talk page, but can you insert whether you support or oppose the move to "Modern Standard Chinese" at the talk:Standard Mandarin article, since the section is a requested move?--TheLeopard (talk) 19:03, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Yeah I'll put something in. Benjwong (talk) 19:11, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Republic of China municipal elections, 2010

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi there,

The below discussion stems around the sentence "On November 30, 2010 four of the DPP candidates Tsai Ing-wen, Chen Chu, William Lai and Su Jia-chyuan (蘇嘉全) were labeled the new Four Heavenly Kings" in the opening passage of Republic of China municipal elections, 2010 page.

It is certainly an interesting viewpoint, however I was wondering whether it seemed suitable for such a comment to appear in the introductory passage. Firstly, despite the fact that the reasoning behind such a comment to be made seems to stem from the results of the 2010 elections, yet it does not seem to hold direct relevance to the election itself. Secondly, the idea of the "Four Heavenly Kings" is not really "official" within the DPP, it seemed to be a creation of the media reports back in the days when there was storm of people fighting it out in the DPP Presidential primaries. Thirdly, the wording of the setence seemed to imply that the DPP itself "named" these four candidates as the new Four Heavenly Kings, which isn't true.

As a result of the reasons mentioned above, I have decided to move the comment into an "Implications and Reactions" section, which is paralled in the chinese version of the article. I think the comment may also be worth mentioning in the 2012 presidential article too. It now reads (in the Republic of China municipal elections, 2010 article), "# Taiwanese political scientist Hsu Yung-Ming believed that the elections signalled the era of the new "Four Heavenly Kings" Tsai Ing-wen, Chen Chu, William Lai and Su Jia-chyuan within the Democratic Progressive Party".

Cheers,

Sleepingstar (talk) 00:11, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Sounds good. Benjwong (talk) 08:47, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

2010 Asian Games

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I noticed you restored information about a TYC protest on the 2010 Asian Games article here, saying it was "related". Did you see the talk page concerns about whether they actually relate to the games and how notable they are and can you answer them? Quigley (talk) 23:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TFZone3.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TFZone3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The article Opposition to the Guangzhou-Hong Kong Express Rail Link is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opposition to the Guangzhou-Hong Kong Express Rail Link until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 08:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Yep I put in a respond. Benjwong (talk) 08:10, 18

January 2011 (UTC)

Hi

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hua-Yi distinction had been renamed by user:Quicktool, which looks like a sockpuppet of some sort, and he had single-handly changed the lead section. Please have a look at Talk:Barbarians in East Asian cultures. Arilang talk 04:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

  1. ^ BFJA Awards 1972
  2. ^ BFJA Awards 1973
  3. ^ BFJA Awards 1975
  4. ^ BFJA Awards 1987
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Benjwong/Archive_6&oldid=1079152069"