Welcome! edit

Hello, AndrewTJay, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Francis Quirk, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! McGeddon (talk) 14:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Francis Quirk edit

Hello! I've moved your incomplete article to Draft:Francis Quirk, as you had stated "This is a working draft", and it was uploaded much too prematurely. You can work on it in Draft space until it is ready to be moved back to the mainspace, where it will again "go live". See WP:DRAFTS for more, and feel free to ask an administrator or myself if you need help moving the article. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 07:05, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Source edit

Hello! This is a helpful edit, however it does not include a source. It is subject to deletion without one, as everything here needs to be WP:VERIFIABLE. If you can dig up a source that would be good. Thanks. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, if this is a clumsy way of answering. I added in the source and hope the formatting works. AndrewTJay (talk) 17:23, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
perfect, thanks. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 17:45, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Agriculture.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Agriculture.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 22:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021 edit

  Hello AndrewTJay! Your additions to John Joseph Enneking have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 10:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, AndrewTJay. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Cyrus Edwin Dallin, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 00:13, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2022 edit

  Your edit to George Frederic Watts has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Verno,
This was disappointing news as this sculpture had a significant influence on American sculptor Cyrus Dallin. Can you tell me more about the specific issue that set off the alarms. Was it quoting the poem? The interpretation? Should I retry or give up on this? AndrewTJay (talk) 21:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
All of the text you added was copied directly from the source, not just the poem. The poem might possibly be usable as non-free content if it is particularly relevant, but in this case it seems pretty incidental to the actual content of the biography. Ignoring the poem for now, though, everything else was published by someone else relatively recently, and so it is copyrighted. In this case, the website says "© 2022 Farringford". Unless you have written permission from Farringford to release the text under a free license then it needs to be rewritten entirely into your own words in order to be usable. If you see the warning you got a year ago, it has this same information for you and more. Does that help at all? VernoWhitney (talk) 01:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Verno,
You have correctly and patiently explained the error of my ways. I have reviewed the rules once and will do so again before I resume any activity. I apologize to you for making you waste your time on dealing with my transgressions. Your patience in dealing with me is greatly appreciated. AndrewTJay (talk) 16:44, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alma Mater Sculpture by Cyrus Dallin (January 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, AndrewTJay! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alma Mater (sculpture) (January 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hoary were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 05:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Alma Mater (Missouri sculpture) has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alma Mater (Missouri sculpture). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:12, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello Robert,
Thank you and the other reviewers for the feedback. As a result, it is a much better and more complete article. With that change can we convert it to a real article? AndrewTJay (talk) 00:50, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alma Mater (Missouri sculpture) (May 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 18:19, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Alma Mater (Missouri sculpture) edit

  Hello, AndrewTJay. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alma Mater (Missouri sculpture), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, AndrewTJay. Thank you for your work on Memory (statue). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 20:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your helpl AndrewTJay (talk) 20:50, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply