User talk:AllyD/Archive3

Sindiso Mazibisa

Hi, I know for a fact that Sindiso Mazibisa is one of the most loved and followed people in Zimbabwe. Please help me on how to develop his profile. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.78.47.46 (talk) 15:49, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Nicola Della Valle

Hi, I just want to let you know that I removed the prod from Nicola Della Valle and redirected the page to Miodio. J04n(talk page) 22:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Salman Gambarov

Hi, and thank you for your attention on my work. I added two more references and hope now it's better sourced! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kheo17 (talk • contribs) 00:37, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out the issues with Psalm 150 (band)

I've provided a reliable source and I think I've cleaned it up sufficiently now. I don't see an entry for the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion so all that's left to be done is for you to remove the prod. Thanks again. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:45, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Yes, it needs better references, but there are bands in that source that take up less space. Psalm 150 gets just over a full column, and some bands only get 1/4 of a column. I wouldn't supply that reference for them. Thanks again. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Jazz Royalties

Beautiful. Prod = Proposal to delete. I hadn't seen or read that acronym anyplace else. I did see that, but "Prod" didn't register. After I research the rules, I'll write more Tapered (talk) 20:21, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

On further reflection: at BEST, this article is worth a heading "Royal Nicknames" in the Nicknames of jazz musicians article, but if jazz fans feel the need to put trivia like this in Wikipedia, it's not wasting enough of the site's bandwidth to be worth my time to deal with it. Frank Zappa was right; "Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny." http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Frank_Zappa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tapered (talk • contribs) 05:34, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

• I'm not an enthusiast on "royal" nicknames myself (or anything else royal come to that). But there was something there as a sociological phenomenon at least in the 20s-30s, with King Oliver, Duke Ellington Count Basie, and can't be completely ignored; that subsection approach looks a decent idea. But best discussed on the article Talk page. I'll copy these points over to there this evening. AllyD (talk) 07:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Contemporary jazz

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Contemporary jazz. Gyrofrog (talk) 22:55, 11 April 2011 (UTC) (Using {{pls}}) -- Gyrofrog (talk) 22:55, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, AllyD. You have new messages at Ebe123's talk page.
Message added 21:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I could archive your talk page for you if you want. ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 21:34, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Notable being established in sandbox

Re: List of jazz pianists‎; 22:12 . . (-20) . . AllyD (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 424924172 by Betty4 (talk) -nonnotable redlink)

Redlink? There are old redlinks all over Wikipedia. I just started this article less than 24 hours ago. You're too quick on the trigger. This article is in the sandbox. Notability is being established off-line. Ricardo Scales "IS" a notable jazz pianist! Wikipedia suggests that contributors "NOT BITE" other new contributors to avoid discouragement. Give a contributor ample time to gather all necessary data before undoing someone else's hard work. --Betty4 (talk) 22:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

• Reply at User_talk:Betty4#Redlinks_on_lists AllyD (talk) 07:09, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Re: Asylum Street Spankers

Sheesh! Given the abusive language, I think in this case a single warning would have been in order - in fact, I went ahead and left one for the anonymous editor. There was an earlier series of similar edits from another IP address, but it looks like the same ISP - I went ahead and left a warning for them, too, even though it was a couple of months ago. If the IP address continues to change, I think we'd need to semi-protect the article. I'll watchlist the article in the meantime. Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 14:56, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

I have gone ahead and blocked the anon. IP for 1 month. The edits are so intermittent that I didn't see any point in the usual 24-hour first block. Given that the IP's only edits have been potentially libelous additions to that one particular article, I think the lengthy block is justified. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Similau

I am not sure the Henry Martin text is the reference I would have picked for this. Considering I transcribed the score, recorded it on a CD I produced, and had talked to Russell myself (around 1999), this is really not where the information came from. But, I have the Martin book at work and cannot look at it until later...let me see what you are looking at.

I am thinking pretty serious of doing a "Bird in Igor's Yard" page (have Russell's score he gave to me). I have full anaylsis of the score and neatly redone into Encore.

Jcooper1 (talk) 14:47, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgar C. Otálvora

I read it and I could not find references of this biography article, then I put tag for nomination.--—AssassiN's Creed ^(talk) 22:37, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Assassin

I've talked to an admin who has also been dealing with this mess. I mentioned the two new AfD's. Said I was done trying and could they do whatever needs to come next. Admin is currently not on-line. Assassin hasn't edited for a few hours, so I wasn't in a hurry. If you feel this needs to goto ANI, I'd support it 100%. Bgwhite (talk) 22:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

The admin responded to his talk page. Bgwhite (talk) 00:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Hubertine Heijermans

Hello, here they speak french, but wikipedia has no swiss section. The french Swiss are under supervision of fr.wikipedia. The Italian Swiss have it.wikipedia, the German Swiss are on de.wikip. The French from France do NOT read even the largest Swiss papers, do hardly know a thing about Swiss museums. Only dead Swiss artists or famous are accepted in France. The article Hubertine Heijermans was written by Paldopaldino in french, and was removed without warning, he just told me he saw pink flags. No discussion, because he does not know how to find the place to talk. He has Italian mother language, writes English with difficulty and worse, understands no dutch. Yet he asked me to help. Paldopaldino is steward and flies long distances, he is seldom at home with his family, therefore he is fast on computers to keep contact on earth. Many references, useful for the article is information from too long ago. All the professors are dead. Only Swietlan Kraczyna is alive, but his native language is Russian. I have a problem to get enough links. But without english nobody in England, Holland, or in the world can read the article. I do not understand why the Internet website with so many paintings cannot serve as a link? The reader finds a portrait of Isabelle Adjani there, where she is an actress in the film 'La Reine Margot.' That is public. Can one image of Adjani serve as a link? How to send it. i do not master the long explanation about sending. Thanks, Kalaharih--Kalaharih (talk) 22:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

• There is no problem with citations in other languages; after all, the one I found is in French. But the article does need references, not least because it is a biography of a living person. And I am sceptical about whether Ms Heijermans meets the notability criteria for artists, which is another reason for seeking references. Perhaps criterion #4 is the best bet, and I thought the Museum van Bommel van Dam might support that, but her works are not listed under "Highlights uit de Collectie" on their website. So I do urge you to seek out references that can meet the criteria, if possible. AllyD (talk) 22:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Yes, no mention in Highlights, but Museum van Bommel van Dam started Highlights later then in the beginning of the 70s. i am sorry to say that you may not have seen the Musée Jenisch where a list is public on their site with the name under H on it. It says Cabinet d'Estampes and ' liste'. this site figures on Wikipedia. They included new work in 2007. But not only museums make a painter gain notoriety. Much depends on his technique, obviously needing an art expert or restorer to establish that criterium. It is late for today, goodnight. Kalahari--Kalaharih (talk) 01:05, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello,

I am very sorry, that I did not use the sandbox at all, I hope i can offer my excuses to other wikipedians because I only now saw, that I had to do trials in the sandbox to get a view, while instead I save the page, and everybody sees every tiny correction. Really stupid of me, Kalaharih--Kalaharih (talk) 18:49, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

• There's nothing wrong with making successive edits in the article itself. But, as I said before, what the article needs is references to establish the subject's notability. The footnotes that have been added are references to the existence of various institutions and people, but do not attest to the subject of the article or demonstrate her notability. For example, there is no point in referencing Singapore as a country; nobody doubts it exists, the issue is whether Ms Heijermans' exhibition there was notable (critical reviews in newspapers for example?) AllyD (talk) 22:30, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

It is best to discuss article improvements in a slightly more public place, so I've copied my comments above to Talk:Hubertine Heijermans where it would be best to continue any further discussion on this topic. AllyD (talk) 22:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

In your talk of 2.32, 14 july 2011 you are right to ask for a clear link, that fortunately i was able to trace. You can find it on *Newspapers Singapore The Straits Times 1994 Any contact I try with Nancy Roach became impossible, because the Gallery does not exist any longer and the person went to Australia. It is right to need to show links, thank you again for making me aware.Kalaharih--Kalaharih (talk) 15:00, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Casbah Roadhouse

Hi AllyD

19:08, 3 October 2011 January (talk | contribs) deleted "Casbah Roadhouse" ‎ (Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.casbahroadhouse.com/#!about-us (CSD G12))

I own the website http://www.casbahroadhouse.com and I see that you deleted my page. I would like to try and create it again please.

Thank you

Darren1111 (talk) 19:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

• Responded at User_talk:Darren1111#Casbah_Roadhouse. AllyD (talk) 17:21, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

For adding that BBC News ref to the Teeside railway viaduct article. I presume I can just copy that format now for other news sources (obviously changing the date and such like)? I have a bit of coding experience so this is slowly making sense to me....The article has been saved from deletion anyway by the looks of it if I'm reading things right. Things certainly move fast around here...the page changed 3 times while I was looking at it tonight!

JagMoore (talk) 19:49, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Charlie Allan (musician) - Saor Patrol

Hi AllyD, thank you for watching my articles about Charlie Allan (musician) and Saor Patrol. I now added more references. I hope it's all right now, if not please give me information what more you need. In germany the "watchers" all work different. Someone deleted the references and gave his okay to the articles. Looking forward to your answer. Greetings from germany HeinzMz (talk) 12:24, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi AllyD, in "Charlie Allan (musican) and "Soar Patrol" I placed more references. Part of them are retrieved by "WikHead". Is that okay now? GreetingsHeinzMz (talk) 09:31, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello AllyD/Archive3! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 10:59, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

Nomination of Nikita Denisenkov for deletion

notability guidelines for artists (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. Saatchi Gallery, London, UK is 100% such resource not mentioning others in External links section.

Proposed deletion And also: Renominations: Once the proposed deletion of a page has been objected to by anyone, it may not be proposed for deletion again. It also has Old prod full tag for further editors

Please open Deletion discussions if you still consider it for deletion.

Lavd^{Let's dialogue} 17:22, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

• Now warned this user twice about removing AfD notices. AllyD (talk) 17:28, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Renominations: Once the proposed deletion of a page has been objected to by anyone, it may not be proposed for deletion again. Lavd^{Let's dialogue} 17:33, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

• And that is why it is now in another process - the Articles for Deletion process that allows a full discussion. So the AfD notice must be left in place to facilitate this discussion by you and by any other editors. AllyD (talk) 17:36, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from an article unless it contains at least one reliable source or was created before 18 March 2010, as you did with Liam Stubbs. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider sourcing the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. According to the WP:BLPPROD Unlike standard proposed deletion, the BLP deletion template may be removed only after the biography contains a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article. If the biography remains unsourced after ten days, the biography may be deleted. Clarkcj12 (talk) 00:02, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Sorry about that thanks for letting me know. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 00:13, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Researcher's Barnstar

		Researcher's Barnstar
		I am both pleased and honored to present you with the Researcher's Barnstar in appreciation for your superb work in finding sources showing Robert Florence notable enough to be included within Wikipedia. While research is not always easy, it is always appreciated. Excellent work! Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:21, 21 November 2011 (UTC))

London Awards for Art and Performance

Please allow this page, as I own the website from which I contributed the initial text, www.londonfestivalfringe.com. Thanks. Gregtallent (talk) 12:27, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

• If you own the website, then there is a clear conflict of interest. AllyD (talk) 12:48, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

I understand. The page is for information purposes only. The London Awards have to be mentioned somewhere on Wikipedia. Thanks. Gregtallent (talk) 13:19, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Marea Gazzard

hi, thanks for the note. given she has an AO CBE, some wp:before before the prod would have been nice. (but then nobody else does). 198.24.31.123 (talk) 17:56, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Wilhelm Edner

Hello,

I was replaying the speedy deletion marked on Wilhelm Edner. He´s a well known entrepenour and a writer, i´ll develop further the article. --Parksinta (talk) 21:19, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

• Replied on user's page. AllyD (talk) 22:05, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

I´m spanish, but i got to know about this man and its company in Malmo, Sweden, i´ve ask for help and there´ll be an swedish article and some better references, thanks ! --Parksinta (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Arvinder Singh Bubber

Just wanted to thank you for adding to this article. Ottawahitech (talk) 20:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Lucas Banker

Thank you for the warning. several citations and references have been added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdommin (talk • contribs) 22:29, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

nik.. .

Thank you for the fix. I am sorry to say I did not know I should not have removed those maintenance templates. Two faults on my part: (1) I did not realize that actual book reference and a youtube-clip about the book background were not good citations. I agree that reputed reviews are valid citations. I've not been able to locate any that I would call reputed. Will work on that. Maybe I'll get some help from others here. (2) I assumed that having done a change, I could remove the maintenance parts. And, if necessary, they would be brought back in. That was a bad decision. So, I guess I should leave the maintenance parts in after editing the page and they would be removed by reviewers if the page is deemed to have fulfilled the requirements. --nik 05:47, 7 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nik.. . (talk • contribs)

Alan Stransman

Hey, I noticed that you've flagged the article on Alan Stransman as review due to "non-credible sources". However, at this time, very little information is available on Stransman so as a result it's hard to find sources that Wikipedia would deem "reliable". However, in the future, when more sources appear on the topic, I will add more sources to make the article more credible.

• Dimre01 (talk) 23:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

• The problem is that Wikipedia is based on verifiable notability now rather than potential future notability. AllyD (talk) 08:52, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

TV Konzen

I have add the country the club operates in. And i improved my references. Hope thats fine now! Juliane Krings (talk) 19:52, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

WP Jazz in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Jazz for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 00:16, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Luc Perino

Hi, I just put Luc Perino's article online and am working on the refrences. Reread the link to Le Monde: the man was cited on his opinion on an article, he didn't actually write it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daceton (talk • contribs) 23:07, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Update: thanks for your comments and your work on the form of the article. Further references on Ordosur are needed, I asked the author if he could provide them although it's mentioned in a online physician's talk on this kind of sotware (http://www.stethonet.org/enquete_bdm/choix%20BdDM/choixBDM.htm). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daceton (talk • contribs) 00:06, 27 December 2011 (UTC) Question: should I have written the summary of the books in the Luc Perino's section instead of creating new sections for each book (most summaries are two lines)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daceton (talk • contribs) 00:20, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

• Replied on Talk page. AllyD (talk) 09:37, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Karl Bryanton

You have deleted my page named 'WorkBook Software' because of a tag that has been placed on WorkBook Software for speedy deletion. Why? Please provide me with some help as to how this page can be acceptable. I have countless other examples of companies/organisations with their own pages on here so why not WorkBook Software? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karlybree (talk • contribs) 07:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

• Replied on user talk page. AllyD (talk) 18:49, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Zim (software)

Dear AllyD, what sort of references for a text-editor do you have in mind?

I took the wikipedia article Ted (word processor) for a template. There the references are to ted's website; debian repository; and ubuntu repository.

Take also the Nano_(text_editor) article: all references are to the nano's development site.

Look also at the JED_(text_editor) article --- the same situation: the reference is to the development site.

I guess all these articles are also not meeting wikipedia gidelines, no? ;)

Could you please show me a wikipedia article about a text-editor which, in your opinion, meets wikipedia guidelines, so I could use is as a good example? :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmon137 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

• The general notability guidelines provide the guidelines - basically requiring "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". This is regardless of whether WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. AllyD (talk) 19:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Again: Could you please show me a wikipedia article about a text-editor which, in your opinion, has significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, so that I could use is it as a good example? Or do you believe *all* articles about text-editors should be deleted from wikipedia? 85.81.116.15 (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

In the recent questionnaire about Wikipedia I was asked whether I think the drop in wiki-edits is due to hostile and incoherent reaction of wikipedians towards newcomers. I didn't understand the question first. I understand now... :( 85.81.116.15 (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

• Off the top of my head, vi and Emacs are articles with significant references and listed sources. But anyway, the point is not to delete articles, it is to ensure that those on Wikipedia have their notability clearly established through independent references. That's all, and that is what the notability tag is requesting. AllyD (talk) 22:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

But anyway, the point is not to delete articles --- aha, and what exactly did you put on top of my article? --- "the article is likely to be ... deleted".

And since you didn't put this note on same refs-quality articles (ted, jed, tomboy, and nano) I find your reaction to a newcomer very hostile and completely incoherent. Anyway, I've got some random references to Zim from some internet magazines (just like in Vim article) --- feel happy, bully. Dmon137 (talk) 11:44, 11 January 2012 (UTC).

Umbrellatm

Dear AllyD, I can you please inform me why my page "didi-07" was deleted, after I add an information which is in the same criteria like the other companies which are in the List of companies of Bulgaria? Can you please inform me where is my mistake or what I have to do turn back the content of the page in the right way? I am waiting your response. Tnak you in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Umbrellatm (talk • contribs) 12:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

• Looking at your Talk page, there have been repeated speedy-deletes of pages about Didi-07 ltd. As stated there, these have been because the pages have no indication as to why the company is notable. I'd suggest referring to WP:CORPDEPTH for details of what is needed for a company to be consdered notable. AllyD (talk) 17:40, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
• Dear AlliD,

Thank you for your response! I read the rules in WP:CORPDEPTHand also the importance of company notability. Can I edit the page Didi-07 now, if I update the information about the company, which means more information to prove the notability of the company? Also I am asking you this, because now I can not change the page, as there is no edit button. I am waiting your help and advice about this matter. Umbrellatm (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC).

• Articles about this company were deleted 4 times on 10th January. If you are thinking of recreating again, I suggest you use the WP:AFC process for guidance on gettng it to the necessary standard to meet Wikipedia guidelines. AllyD (talk) 19:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

You are Bigot

You are a Bigot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by True Pagan (talk • contribs) 09:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Miguel Zenón, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Sánchez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

• Cheers but that edit was actually a revert past a Copyvio overwrite. Changed the name link anyway. AllyD (talk) 12:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Pribilša db

I was to redirect Pribilša to Grdeša (his father). --Zoupan (talk) 22:24, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey, thanks for the reminder of the reference, I'll add one now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoyRiderProdz (talk • contribs) 19:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Need your help

Can you tell me how to avoid the promotional links or give me some examples of those promotional links or words ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Othmanebenjelloun (talk • contribs) 10:48, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

• Replies at talk page. AllyD (talk) 13:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism

DId you see this revert too? I added like 11 sources and cleaned it up. His version is reverted to one which says "BEST diabetes hospital"! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

MNB Technologies, Inc

The staff at MNB prepared the base article for Wikipedia and did so in a very objective manner with no marketing hype, etc. We then asked others familiar with our company and products to provide feedback and incorporated their thoughts so that it presents information of particular interest accurately.

We then also added references to independent news and trade publications, federal government awards, and relevant awards by independent agencies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nvgranny (talk • contribs) 15:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

• A problem is that asking for and incorporating feedback, which good business practice for in-house publications, is original research in terms of Wikipedia; it is implicitly selective. I appreciate the references that have been added, but much of the article is promotional in tone. AllyD (talk) 15:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
• (Also copied the above conversation to Talk:MNB Technologies, Inc. as a more appropriate ongoing place.) AllyD (talk) 15:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Hamza Tzortzis

Thanks for the inital tags and downgrading the alert on the new article. I'm working on it and will removed some tags as the page is updated.Asifkhanj (talk) 21:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Rossignol Technology

we prepared a base for an article for Wikipedia. We try to do it with an objective manner as we are doing in the French version[[1]]. We asked others to forward additional materials and references. We were planning to incorporate our findings in the base article when we discovered that the article has been removed ! Can we recover the original posting for a new start in a sand box ? regards Maseracing (talk) 14:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

• Replied on User_talk:Maseracing#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Rossignol_Technology. AllyD (talk) 14:39, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Matthew Kelly (speaker)

Hello, AllyD. Yobbo14, who created the Matthew Kelly (speaker) article, has made a few more edits to the article, and is asking for feedback, at Talk:Matthew Kelly (speaker)/Archives/2014#Suggestions welcome. Since you tagged the article after it was created, with notability, POV, and multiple issues tags, I'm wondering if you'd be able to comment there, and let Yobbo14 (and other editors) know how the article should be improved enough for the tags to be removed. (Perhaps some of the tags can be taken off now. So far I don't have a strong opinion myself, although seeing your specific suggestions might help me develop one.) Thanks! — Mudwater ^(Talk) 12:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the specific feedback on the article talk page. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 00:50, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

About "Bjørnar Berg". I'm putting in a couple of references soon. Publishing two novels and an essay-book should be enough for listing, as long as what's written is relevant and formal. Bjørnar B — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjørnar B (talk • contribs) 19:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Appreciate your messages, I know how hard this wikipedia stuff is :) Kawadri (talk) 20:08, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Hélène Rochette

Hello. I recently created the article Hélène Rochette, which I basically translated from fr.wiki. I tried to insert a link in the references section, with no success. I was thinking the perhaps you would know how to insert such a link (since you deleted the unsuccessful one...). --MaxDawsonC (talk) 00:52, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

• I'd previously moved the French Wikipedia one out to an inter-wiki link, so that it appears elsewhere on the page. Anyway, the article is looking better now, through your further ref editing. I've also added a 3rd party ref (always better than the subject's own site). AllyD (talk) 09:07, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

OK. Thank you. --MaxDawsonC (talk) 13:50, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, AllyD. You have new messages at Yasht101's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Yasht101 :) 11:19, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Wipf and Stock

I hear what you say. Go ahead and delete the article and the associated imprint redirects, if you like. Nirvana2013 (talk) 18:03, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Marel hf

I've added another reference and replaced the one that relied on the company's web page. I hope this is a step in the right direction at least. I would love to hear what else I can do to improve the page (and future pages - this is my first). Omnis73 (talk) 23:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

The entry now has four notes from three reliable third-party sources. Could you please take a look at it and remove the tags you added earlier, if it fulfills the requirements? If not, could you please tell me what I can do further? Omnis73 (talk) 19:48, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Taekwondoscotland

I noticed you edited the Taekwondoscotland page. Please see the talkpage for that article. Thanks. Chrissyboi (talk) 18:05, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

International Organization for a Participatory Society, Tags

Thanks for adding the notability and primary sources tags to the article. I tried adding reliable, secondary sources. Do you think they are sufficient to remove the tags? JohKar (talk) 17:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

setting up pages

Andrew Dickie (talk) 01:18, 5 April 2012 (UTC)Andrew DickieAndrew Dickie (talk) 01:18, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

I'm setting up pages but don't know quite how to do it and they are being deleted I'm told? This is all a bit confusing.

Ricky Toner — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Dickie (talk • contribs) 01:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Waqidi Falicoff, Music Career

Thank for your input. I have spent several years trying to rectify the lack of credit for my co-composing of the Broadway Show, "Story Theatre", which won 2 Tony awards in 1971 and was nominated for best show of the year. Not only was I not given proper credit but another person who also a co-composer was also not credited, Raphael Grinage. Neither of us received nearly $250,000 in royalties at the time and none of the composers received any royalties from the ABC TV Show, Story Theatre. Although, the director of the show, Paul Sills, did correct some of the key Broadway databases for me (Samuel French), my colleague and I never received the accolades given to a composer of a Broadway "hit" show, as was given to the two other composers (Johnny Carson Show, etc). Ordinarily I would certainly not post a Wikipedia page about myself. Indeed, if you notice I did not make this a bio about my entire career but only my music. I will leave it to others to post about me in these other fields if my contributions warrant it.

At least I was honest as to who created the article. I could have easily had a proxy do it for me. I would also point out that I have reviewed numerous Wikipedia pages on individuals I know. I can tell you categorically that there is no way that all these articles were done without the help of the individual, minimally a close friend or relative. The level of detail is simply too great.

I thank you very much for the opinion. I can tell you that I was not 100% happy in doing this. If you think that my musical accomplishment as a Broadway Composer does not meet the minimum "fame" requirement of Wikipedia, I would understand if it is chosen to be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WFalicoff (talk • contribs) 17:34, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

• Replied at User_talk:WFalicoff#Issues_with_biographical_article. AllyD (talk) 08:11, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

TRG Media

Hi AllyD,

You recently put the page TRG Media up for speedy deletion. As of right now, we do not have much content up on the article, nor do we have our full citations listed. Until we have completed the website, is it possible for the speedy removal tags to be deleted, or for the page to be saved as an unfinished draft?

Thanks! -TheRealGeeks

Therealgeeks (talk) 21:48, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Wadi Adventure - Conflict of Interest

Hi AllyD,

Apologies if I have wasted your time by starting a page on Wadi Adventure (now deleted) but I thought this facility may prove just as interesting as the many like it that have their own pages on Wikipedia and create a basic template for others with an interest in the tourist attractions of the region or the technology employed to build common knowledge. It was not my intention to spam and accordingly I made my professional connection to the project clear and did not include non-factual information in what was written. I understand the reasoning behind the deletion and if it should remain so then would it be proper of me to remove links to it I made in other articles?

Kind Regards, Dan Harmon (talk) 20:00, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi

Hi AllyD,

Will do the referencing once I get the time...SSK999 (talk) 11:51, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

MessageNet systems

Hi AllyD, thank you for taking the time to tag this page I created this morning. It looks like you're very well experienced in company notability, and I welcome your expertise! I also welcome more editors to help add more sources to this company's article, as I think this company contributes to this field (forgive me if I'm enthusiastic about my IT interest!).

As of the time of posting, I hadn't yet completed entering all the references in my list (you're fast!); but I've since added the majority of them. At your convenience, would you mind soon taking another look and reconsidering the tags you placed there, please? I'm not sure if there's one that asks for more sources, and isn't so strong as to say it might be deleted, perhaps?... I'm still sort of new to editing here. Please advise! Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris.rider81 (talk • contribs) 18:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

I've since added references. And there has been additional activity from other editors. I think this article is well on its way to being of a more notable status. I haven't heard anything back from you since my last communication above, so I think you are pretty busy. In light of that, I'm going to go ahead and remove the notability tag, but leave the primary-sources tag. Hopefully someone in the community, in-the-know about this industry, can provide even more! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris.rider81 (talk • contribs) 18:53, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

• Replied at Talk:MessageNet systems. AllyD (talk) 19:08, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Alfred Fischer (judge)

• Thanks for finding a reference for the article! Gsingh (talk) 18:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Organicum

Dear AllyD,

Thank you for your contributions and comments to article Organicum. Organicum is a well known and respected brand in Turkey that is sold in pharmacy channel. The founder of the brand Ms. Isik Kirgiz (http://www.isikkirgiz.com)is a herbalist and bioenergy expert that hes been treating many hair and skin problems since 1980's. You can find the list of pharmacies that sells Organicum at (http://http://www.organicum.com/eczaneler.asp) The product is exported to other countries including Germany (http://www.amazon.de/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?__mk_de_DE=%C5M%C5Z%D5%D1&url=search-alias%3Dbeauty&field-keywords=organicum)

I will appreciate your help and comments on the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enengin (talk • contribs) 05:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

• The fact that a product exists and is for sale is not sufficient for a Wikipedia article: what is needed is evidence of its notability. AllyD (talk) 18:33, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Germans

Hi. I found an error in the article (see photo). Copernicus was not a German, he was from Poland. --Top811 my talk —Preceding undated comment added 13:26, 12 May 2012 (UTC).

• Not sure why you're telling me this?!?! I've walked past his statue on Nowy Świat countless times over the past 25 years. AllyD (talk) 14:06, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Templates to point users to other Wikipedias

For people like today's Albanian who post articles in other languages, there is at WP:PNT/T a useful set of templates to point them to the relevant WP. Many of them are bilingual, like {{contrib-sq1}}, which can be useful if the contributor doesn't understand English. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:42, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

• In that particular case, a Google translation indicated it was an unreferenced story about a woman wearing a Niqab going into a French shop, so some distance from appropriate WP content in any language. AllyD (talk) 17:04, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

• Oh, sure, Google also showed that both his articles were copyvio and I zapped them accordingly, but (though it may be hard on the Albanian WP) he may as well be pointed to someone who can at least try to explain things in his own language, and it may reduce the likelihood of his wasting any more of our time. But the main point of the PNT/T templates is that not infrequently we get serious contributors who just don't know there is any other WP. JohnCD (talk) 22:31, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Nikita Denisenkov Recovery

Hi. Can you please send me the text of that old article I made about Nikita Denisenkov or hint how I can find that text myself. Thanks. Lavd (talk) 08:30, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

• Replied on user page. AllyD (talk) 16:41, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

blpprod queues

Hey, my 'bot got approved for a trial, so the BLPPROD expiration categories should be working more consistently now. Let me know if you see problems in the future! Thanks! --joe decker^{talk to me} 18:06, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Monoblock

Hi AllyD, thank you so much for your attention! I think article's (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoblock_Industry_of_Imagineering) neutrality (and importance) is sustained by the provided list of multiple independent, third-party reliable sources that describe the subject in detail (websites, newspaper articles and critical reviews). I checked neutrality again though, and modified some wording. Also, I read the wiki of a project very similar to this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poketo) to ensure I was contributing in a fair way. Let me know if it is OK (as I'm pretty new to this). Maybe you can edit it? VikArrieta (talk) 03:19, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

BLPPROD expirations

By the way, I have a bot going and poking BLPPRODed articles daily, so expirations should show up in the appropriate expiration categories within 24 hours or so of true expiration. I don't think that was related to the editor yanking the BLPPROD, I think that was just a policy error on her or his part, and an error on my part for not catching it and reverting his removal of the tag. --joe decker^{talk to me} 19:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

ibckgb

Hi there. We are the public relations agency for IBC Bank and have attempted to make edits to the page to include new/updated information. We would appreciate if you would allow these changes to remain on the page. If you have any questions, please feel free to call us at 210-826-8899. J04n(talk page) 22:01, 4, June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibckgb (talk • contribs)

• Responded on user talk page, pointing to problems with WP:COI and with editing on behalf of an organisation. AllyD (talk) 14:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, AllyD. You have new messages at DBigXray's talk page.
Message added 17:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DℬigXray 17:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of DCOM Productions

I don't understand why the page was deleted. I used http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fog_Creek_Software as a template, which has been on Wikipedia for the longest of time, and has no more notability than the information I provided for my own page. I can reference numerous other long-standing articles that I also used as a template, which contain no more information than I provided as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeadX07 (talk • contribs) 11:47, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: FaultTrack

Hello AllyD. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of FaultTrack, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article is not substantially the same as the deleted version. A new deletion discussion is required. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:41, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for you work on Ushida Findlay Architects. I've withdrawn my AfD nomination.

Stuartyeates (talk) 21:18, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

RobynMay (previously CGWLaw)

Hi there. Thanks for your comments - I have changed my username and have re-read the article on Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers which I believe is written in a neutral tone and has a number of external references. As far as I can tell (and I am new to this) it fits within the guidelines for where a conflict of interest may apply. Thanks. RobynMay (talk) 22:47, 18 June 2012 (UTC)RobynMay

St. Gregory Luxury Hotels & Suites

Can you take a look at St. Gregory Luxury Hotels & Suites? I removed sources that I considered less than reliable following a conversation on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Hotel information sourcing. I just don't know organisation notability well enough to judge on some of these. You may also want to look at T:TDYK where several hotels have been nominated for DYK. --LauraHale (talk) 23:32, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed Deletion of Integral Manager

Deletion is not clear until a logical reason is mentioned This article describes one of the styles of management there is, deleting this article denies that there are different kind of styles of management. --S.A. de Ruiter 17:26, 30 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saruiter (talk • contribs)

• Some of us have worked in organisations for many years and are perfectly aware of different styles of management. The issue here is whether the Intergral Manager (sic) article meets Wikipedia criteria, hence the AfD discussion. AllyD (talk) 17:30, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

• Again there it is ot clear which critieria of Wikipedia you are refering to, your'e statement is to global atm. If there is no logical AfD reason I suggest you remove the AfD. --S.A. de Ruiter 17:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Saban Bey

Why you want delete it?

Strange...very strange...

Dilek2 (talk) 21:12, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

• Lack of references to indicate that the subject was actually notable. AllyD (talk) 21:14, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

APRAISE

Dear AllyD,

Many thanks for your comments. They were really helpful. May I kindly ask you to provide me with some extra information about the fact that the article is written in an "essay style" in order to improve it? Thank you in advance.

With kind regards,

V. Marinakis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vmarinakis (talk • contribs) 10:17, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Multidimensional Science AfD

Hello, AllyD, thank you for your comment. The theory of elastic membrane is in agreement with modern physics, and gives us true multidimensional description of the reality. The theory gives explanation of human perception - so called hard problem of consciousness. Science must be multidimensional and structures describing our Universe also must be multidimensional. For multidimensional geometry and multidimensional physics see the links: http://vixra.org/pdf/1207.0036v1.pdf and http://vixra.org/pdf/1111.0092v1.pdf The theory represents a new scientific paradigm different from the existing one, proposed by Decartes, because the old one cannot explain the nature of the living world. Thank you for discussion.Alex21cen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex21cen (talk • contribs) 11:00, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

• Wikipedia is not a place for original research: WP:NOR. AllyD (talk) 11:16, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Dear AllyD, the theory has been published and discussed by leading scientists at three international conferences: Albert Einstein Century International conference in Paris (2005), Congress of History of Science and Technology in Budapest (2009), Toward a Science of Consciousness 2011 International Conference in Stockholm and had increasing number of supporters. This is just another confirmation of multidimensionality of most scientific theories. The theory is based on the ideas of Albert Einstein and Sir Roger Penrose. I think this page will be very important, progressive and useful for all wikipedians. This isn't an original research, but the product of collective efforts of many scientists. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.73.252.189 (talk) 15:41, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, AllyD. You have new messages at Wingtipvortex's talk page.
Message added 21:10, 1 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 21:10, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, AllyD. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Marczyński.
Message added 21:11, 1 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 21:11, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for noticing that the article for Adam Marczyński had been changed and did not really qualify for deletion. WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 23:47, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

from user: Yukihare

For this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MUSA%27s_Trio&pe=1& Please do not delete any source from facebook or video links, as those ARE official and only reference from the artist up to this moment. I may add more magazine source too if you request. KKBOX is more or less the LARGEST online music base in Chinese-Asia area so that is a reliable source too. Thank you very much for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yukihare (talk • contribs) 01:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

• Facebook is not a reliable source, Youtube is not a reliable source; Wikipedia is not a reliable source. KKBox I don't know, so I didn't delete it as a pseudo-reference in the article, but it too may need evaluation: size does not automatically denote notability, the question would be whether the content there is reputably-sourced. AllyD (talk) 06:53, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Eric Schlager-Content Removal

Dear Sir/Madam:

Thank you very much for your editing assistance with this article on Eric Schlager. Could you kindly provide me with the deleted content regarding the firm (The Bulfinch Companies, Inc.)that you deleted so that it may be added to a page about the Bulfinch Companies?

Very Respectfully. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EDS250 (talk • contribs) 20:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

• See this difference or this version of the article. AllyD (talk) 22:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Modal

[2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by BassHistory (talk • contribs) 21:08, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Bodens Page Edit

Hi Ally, Just wondering if you could explain why the Bodens page has been put up for deletion, I see no reason why it is less valid than say Chickenshed which seems to be regarded as a good article?

I'm not Ally (just passing through...), but to me it reads as advertising. Also, there's only the one reference (Watford Observer) that's any use at all - the others look to fail WP:RS (reliable independent sources that aren't mere mentions, profiles, directories etc). Peridon (talk) 18:15, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

I'd advise rereading the Chickenshed article. I've heard of Chickenshed, and I live nowhere near London. The article is quite different, and the referencing, while not perfect, has some good ones. Two MBE's don't do them any harm, either... To me, Bodens means a company dealing in woodshavings and pet things. Peridon (talk) 18:22, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Marian Richero

I'm not sure it has been AfDed, but as Marian Richero it's salted, so I've deleted it A7 with a mention of re-creation of protected page. Peridon (talk) 18:08, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

phpFox

Hey AllyD, If removed the section that you said was 'Promotional' Would I be alright to re-submit the Article? John F. Lewis (talk) 20:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

• I see you've gone ahead and done that. I would have suggested taking it to the Articles for Creation process; for one thing, there are a lot of PHP associated packages going through Articles for Deletion at the moment on grounds of non-notability. And, in the interests of transparency, it would be good if you add something to the Talk page to specify your association with PhpFox? AllyD (talk) 20:31, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Could you link me or tell me the name of one Community/Social Networking platform that is going or has gone though AfD, And im only a 3rd party developer with them. I have no bias decision against them to be quite honest. John F. Lewis (talk) 21:26, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Pry

Can you help me understand exactly how many man-hours a project needs to have before it's notable enough?

Should I provide a list of other projects that do have pages that are far less impactive than Pry?

Do you know what Pry is, btw?

Thanks. —☈ (I'm PvtKing — I managed to not be logged in somehow.)

• Like all other Wikipedia articles, this one needs to have reliable 3rd party references that demonstrate it meets the notability criteria, in this case, the WP:NSOFT criteria. (The fact that there are other articles on Wikipedia that are deficient - as there are - is not really a useful argument, asone has to start from somewhere. AllyD (talk) 21:11, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
  • I don't think that putting deletion tags on pages within a few hours of their creation is necessary (especially for something like Pry, which obviously dominates Google results, and for obvious reasons if you look into it in any depth). This level of strictness is nowhere near the spirit of Ward's wiki. PvtKing (talk) 16:20, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	Thanks for your New pages Patrol works! Tito Dutta ✉ 09:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Credo Reference

I'm sorry to report that there were not enough accounts available for you to have one. I have you on our list though and if more become available we will notify you promptly.

We're continually working to bring resources like Credo to Wikipedia editors, and this will very hopefully not be your last opportunity to sign up for one. If you haven't already, please check out WP:HighBeam and WP:Questia, where accounts are still available. Cheers, Ocaasi 19:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

CSD nomination

Hi. I decided to revoke your speedy deletion nomination of PECO Pallet. I think "national leader in pallet pooling services" et al. is sufficient to avoid A7 deletion. No prejudice against nominating it via PROD or AfD if you think it is necessary. Have a good one. NTox · talk 21:05, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Imperial Privileged Oriental Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Law (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

??

Hi, a few points:

Firstly, it was a typo, I meant Citizen Khan. Secondly, I created the 'Citizen Kahn' page before the 'Khan' one so don't imply in your text that I deliberately created the article knowing that a proper one existed as I created first.

Mythical Curse (talk) 17:18, 28 August 2012 (UTC).

• Replied at User_talk:Mythical_Curse#Your_contributed_article.2C_Citizen_Kahn. AllyD (talk) 17:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I understand that, the issue I have is this bit: 'the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page'. Whilst I respect that I made a mistake with spelling, when I created the page, it was the only page relating to the TV show. I didn't create the page knowing there was already a Citizen Khan page, I created it because no-one else had and I felt that if I created one, other editors might then help and improve the article as has been the case with other articles that I have created. Kind regards, Mythical Curse (talk) 14:22, 29 August 2012 (UTC).