Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Alic.Mat23, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 02:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ask intelligent questions

When asking a question at the Help desk or the Reference desk, please include all the facts needed to answer the question. For example, do not ask "who was president in 1900?" without mentioning the country you are interested in. This prevents the volunteers of those departments from having to ask follow-up questions before providing answers. Friendly reminder: the Help desk is for questions on how to use Wikipedia, while the Reference desk is for questions about anything else (real world questions).

Read more:
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hawazi Daipi (February 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 13:16, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Alic.Mat23! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 13:16, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ronny Santana for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ronny Santana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronny Santana until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 00:21, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Milanblocks

edit

Hello Alic.Mat23,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Milanblocks for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 21:07, 7 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Giacomo Ciufoli

edit

Hello Alic.Mat23,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Giacomo Ciufoli for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 10:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of NK Forster Guitars

edit
 

The article NK Forster Guitars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet WP:NCORP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 17:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alic.Mat23 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This was my first and only account at Wikipedia. Bilby, Kindly inform me accounts which you are reffering to me? How I am linked with these?

Decline reason:

I have extensively examined the editing history of this and a number of other accounts. It is perfectly clear that this account has edited in collaboration with other accounts, and virtually certain that it has been operated by the same person as at least some of those other accounts. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:01, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Alic.Mat23 (talk) 04:55, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

The master account was User:IMZahidIqbal. The last known sock of IMZahidIqbal was blocked on January 16. This account started editing 2 days later, and continued to engage in undisclosed paid editing. - Bilby (talk) 13:05, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Please disclose as required by WP:PAID. Please list any accounts you have edited with. Please disclose accounts of any other user(s) with whom you have coordinated edits. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:25, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bilby,User:Dlohcierekim I cannot understand how you linked me with this account. Kindly tell me the reason and edits which you are claiming we did mutually or coordinated?Alic.Mat23 (talk) 11:12, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, no. I've no interest in telling people how I recognize socking, and I'm sure no one else does. Might was well request input from JamesBWatson as they actually declined the unblock. However, the essence of my post was that you read and heed WP:PAID and that you come forward with any other user names you've used or coordinated with. Thanks, --Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:49, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply