User talk:Agnihothri Sharath/Archive 1

Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naslen K. Gafoor (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iamfarzan was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Naslen K. Gafoor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Naslen K. Gafoor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Iamfarzan (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of President of India

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article President of India you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 04:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of President of India

The article President of India you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:President of India for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Government of Kerala

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Government of Kerala you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:40, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Government of Kerala

The article Government of Kerala you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Government of Kerala for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

reverted edit in A.C.E

Hello, I would like to know the reason why you reverted an edit without giving any explanation. Thanks, Bloomingbyungchan (talk) 17:28, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mohanlal

The article Mohanlal you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mohanlal for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:20, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Athar Aamir Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Athar Aamir Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athar Aamir Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DMySon (talk) 07:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

unsourced BLPs

The way we handle unsourced BLPs is not speedy deletion, but WP:BLPPROD, to allow people to find a source (Obvious, it the purpose of the article is libelous or abusive, that is a criterion for speedy, sourced or unsourced) DGG ( talk ) 04:35, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Divya S. Iyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Konni. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

 Done, page linked Sreeram Dilak (talk) 06:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Already exists

Hi @Sreeram Dilak:, Hope you are safe on this global pandamic. Since, you are a new to Wikipedia you had done great work for the creation of Draft:Supriya Menon, but the article is already exists see this. So, I recommend you to copy your draft content and paste it into this(That i provided url in this message) article. Thank you !Fade258 (talk) 13:28, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Fade258, thank you for your appreciation. I'll do it.. Thank you so much.. --Sreeram Dilak (talk) 13:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Ok ! First of all, pls add an additional " : " (colon) from the previous message thread for one space indentations to the right as this is the communicaation protocal. Pls see Help:Wikitext for additional Wiki markup. Fade258 (talk) 13:34, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Sure. --Sreeram Dilak (talk) 13:35, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Great work. I recommend you to check the article. Thank you !Fade258 (talk) 13:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

It's done.. see, Supriya Menon. Sreeram Dilak (talk) 13:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Supriya Menon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Supriya Menon. Thanks! Iamfarzan (talk) 10:49, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Naslen K. Gafoor. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. dont remove the comments Iamfarzan (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

The draft is created by me, and I've the right to submit it for review. Sreeram Dilak (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

dont delete the comments. and fix the problem resubmit the source that you given is not enough. Iamfarzan (talk) 16:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Iamfarzan, see, you removed my draft submitted template. You wrote that comment before submitting it for review, see. Is that right? Sreeram Dilak (talk) 16:07, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

what is this you removed my comment saying its unnecessary so dont repeat that. Iamfarzan (talk) 16:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

if you need my help you can MAIL ME Iamfarzan (talk) 16:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Are you threatening me? What Ive mentioned there is, you can't comment on a draft page unless it is submitted? Or you've the right to comment on every draft without submitting it for the review? Sreeram Dilak (talk) 16:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

am not threatening you there are rule. AFC reviewer can comment on draft unless it is submitted. Iamfarzan (talk) 16:30, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Supriya Menon (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Supriya Menon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Supriya Menon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:50, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Venkitesh V. P (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Venkitesh V. P and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Venkitesh V. P, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 17:49, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naslen K. Gafoor (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iamfarzan was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Naslen K. Gafoor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Naslen K. Gafoor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Iamfarzan (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Govindarajan T J

Hello, Sreeram Dilak,

Thank you for creating Govindarajan T J.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

link to this article from the constituency and the relevant election articles

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

 Done Sreeram Dilak 07:38, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve S. Stalin Kumar

Hello, Sreeram Dilak,

Thank you for creating S. Stalin Kumar.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Should this page be moved to S. Stalinkumar per the two references in the article? as that would seem to be the common name

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 ^Talk 13:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello @Joseywales1961:, hope you are doing good. Yes, I've moved the page to S. Stalinkumar. Sreeram Dilak 14:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mohanlal

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mohanlal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:40, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Failed good article nomination on September 10, 2021

Upon its review on September 10, 2021, your good article nomination of Nayanthara was quick-failed because it:

contains cleanup banners including, but not limited to, {{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}}, etc, or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar inline tags

thus making it ineligible for good article consideration.

This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far. — GhostRiver 02:14, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Artists

The "artists" deletion sorting list is ONLY for visual artists such as painters and sculptors. Please don't add musicians, tv people etc. Johnbod (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

I was coming here to mention the same thing. PLease do not list musicians, actors, playback singers etc under the artists sort. Thanks. --- Possibly ☎ 04:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Sreeram Dilak! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Writing an article
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Help pages
• The Teahouse (newcomer help)
• Main help desk

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 07:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Shaji issac, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Shaji issac! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Lakshmi Nakshathra. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! -Joxin 09:13, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello @JoxinMcDaniel:, I haven't done anything wrong. Krishnamanu123 is blocked as a sock of Sanju Vishnudas. Krishnamanu123 is the creator of Lakshmi Nakshathra, so I placed {{db-banned}}. Sreeram Dilak 09:23, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Sreeram Dilak,

After reviewing your request, I have added your account to the rollback group. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Users should be informed (or warned) after their edits have been reverted. If warnings repeatedly don't help, WP:ANI is the default place to go. In cases of very clear ongoing intentional damage to the encyclopedia, WP:AIV can be used.
• Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your answer will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
• Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive. Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like "[[WP:NPOV|not neutral]]" or "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]" is helpful.
• Rollback may never be used to edit war, which you'll notice to be surprisingly tempting in genuine content disputes. Please especially keep the three-revert rule in mind. If you see others edit warring, please file a report at WP:ANEW. The most helpful essay I've ever seen is WP:DISCFAIL; it is especially important for those who review content regularly.
• If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use Special:EmailUser/Oversight or Special:EmailUser/Emergency; ideally bookmark these pages now. See WP:OS and WP:EMERGENCY for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.
• Use common sense.

To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mohanlal

The article Mohanlal you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mohanlal for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much --Shaji issac (talk) 14:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aswathy Sreekanth has been accepted

Aswathy Sreekanth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Iamfarzan (talk) 16:04, 1 September 2021 (UTC)