Media coverage of Bernie Sanders - German sources edit

I saw your post at Talk: Michael Bloomberg.  Over at Media coverage of Bernie Sanders, it has been difficult to find reliable sources reporting on media bias against Bernie Sanders (because the mainstream sources are the ones being accused of bias!). Has the German media reported on this?  Kolya Butternut (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC) Yes, there is that on the part of conspiracy theory media (sorry, I won't link that, because I don't want to promote sites that spread anti-Semitic narrative, the German left has been marked by anti-Semitism for a hundred years. This is a very complex issue.) All in all, the German-language press is on Sanders' side because he is seen as the most promising counter-canidate. See for example here: https://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/michael-bloombergs-erste-tv-debatte-attacken-von-bernie-sanders-und-elizabeth-warren-a-77947e94-f253-42cd-ab4d-49e4e8b565b0 Sorry, do not have time to edit my answerReply

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Controversial topic area alert edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 05:15, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, Aberlin2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Parler did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  — Newslinger talk 05:15, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nazir Peroz has been accepted edit

 
Nazir Peroz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tom (LT) (talk) 23:35, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:OMSI – The bus simulator edit

  Hello, Aberlin2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:OMSI – The bus simulator, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:OMSI – The bus simulator edit

 

Hello, Aberlin2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "OMSI – The bus simulator".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

DE to EN translation edit

I noticed your Tea house question about the translation of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft. I do a lot of translations, mostly from French, sometimes from German. Feel free to ask me questions below, or at my Talk page, regarding translations into English Wikipedia. Mathglot (talk) 08:29, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 29 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sarah-Lee Heinrich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EVG. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Aberlin2/Deutsche Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft edit

  Hello, Aberlin2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aberlin2/Deutsche Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: German Educational Research Association (December 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Aberlin2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply