April 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Beth Elliott, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 08:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Lettherebedarklight. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Richard Fiedler have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. 何をしましたか?那晚安啦。 08:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2022 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:18, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Tess Holliday have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 01:08, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Abortion in Oregon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:12, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

March 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Skynxnex. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jenny Talia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Skynxnex (talk) 20:19, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jeanne Calment have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DreamRimmer (talk) 12:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harry Kuntz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 09:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm TheBigBookOfNaturalScience. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Edsby—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TheBigBookOfNaturalScience 📖 (💬/📜) 03:11, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abortion in Vietnam. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Prodraxis {talkcontributions} (she/her) 00:53, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Abortion in Canada, you may be blocked from editing. Stop doing this. You are not allowed to delete a post once others have already responded to it. Meters (talk) 07:54, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
See WP:TALK#REPLIED Meters (talk) 08:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Abortion in Puerto Rico—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:16, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Disruptive editing on multiple abortion-related articles. Clearly the same editor as previously warned Meters (talk) 01:00, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krister Sundelin (September 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 75.27.37.89! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at KwaZulu-Natal. Meters (talk) 05:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Jägermeister—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AgisdeSparte (talk) 11:35, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Julie Leach edit

Thank you for your constructive edit to Julie Leach. Your contributions are appreciated! Cheers! My Pants Metal (talk) 15:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024 edit

  Hello, I'm Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Phil Scott, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2024 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Irtysh, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 14:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Nomination of Krister Sundelin for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krister Sundelin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krister Sundelin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Doug Weller talk 07:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

April 2024 edit

  Hello, I'm Classicwiki. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Puma (genus), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 05:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ElENdElA. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Abortion in Texas have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ElENdElA (talk) 11:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abortion in Louisiana. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ElENdElA (talk) 11:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Bel Edwards, you may be blocked from editing. ElENdElA (talk) 11:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

CS1 error on Abortion in Washington (state) edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Abortion in Washington (state), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply