June 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Baerentp. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shantipriya (actress) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Baerentp (talk) 12:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shantipriya (actress). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Baerentp (talk) 12:44, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shantipriya (actress), you may be blocked from editing. Baerentp (talk) 12:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Media (communication) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2020

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Robin Gibb, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 22:37, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ved Prakash Upaddhay (July 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paper9oll was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Paper9oll (🔔📝) 09:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 202.134.9.139! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Paper9oll (🔔📝) 09:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ved Prakash Upadhyay for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ved Prakash Upadhyay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ved Prakash Upadhyay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 03:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply