Welcome! edit

Hello 138.162.0.44!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (138.162.0.44) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! - theWOLFchild 22:08, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help
  This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.


Notice about this IP address edit

This IP address is one of those used by the proxies associated with the US Department of the Navy (incl Marine Corps) via NMCI. As such, there is a very, very large range of people who use this address. It does not excuse whatever happens, it is just here for your information.

Please also bear in mind, as a result, this is a Wikipedia sensitive IP address. Please read about sensitive IP addresses before blocking.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.162.0.41 (talk) 14:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

January 2006 edit

Your recent vandalisms to Travis Barker and United States Navy are unacceptable. Please use the Sandbox if you wish to experiment with the interface. KC9CQJ 20:20, 31 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Edit Summary Request edit

I have noted that you edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini 20:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

March 2007 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Ford Crown Victoria, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Leafyplant 16:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your change was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. - Mike Rosoft 17:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

May 2007 edit

  Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Nique talk 02:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

June 2007 edit

  Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Oxygen toxicity. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Danski14(talk) 18:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
 
This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism to Sodium benzoate will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nunquam Dormio 17:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

July 2007 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Neil916 (Talk) 06:51, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Nunquam Dormio 07:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

July 26 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to LeBron James, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --OnoremDil 17:04, 26 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Ashworth University. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. NAHID 18:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

october 2007 edit

 
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dahlgren, Virginia, you will be blocked from editing. VirginiaProp 12:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

November 2007 edit

 
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Charles J. Colgan, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Icestorm815 21:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

May 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Operation Darkness has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Prom3th3an (talk) 11:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Talk:Operation Darkness constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Prom3th3an (talk) 11:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

June 2008 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Alligator Snapping Turtle. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. swaq 14:48, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to List of micronations. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jakisbak (talk) 23:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

September 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Lindsey Graham has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. abf /talk to me/ 13:42, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

October 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Humanities has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Flewis(talk) 14:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The New York Times, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Fullobeans (talk) 21:00, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Teresa has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 21:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Lollapalooza lineups by year. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fullobeans (talk) 22:59, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to United States Navy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 16:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2008 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 19:39, 4 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The Scapecast edit

If the same person who edited User:Gotyear/The Scapecast from this IP address wishes to continue attempting to improve it into a potential article, please let me know at my talk page. Gotyear (talk) 12:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

January 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ogallala Aquifer has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


 
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories was changed by 138.162.0.44 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-01-15T18:05:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kart racing, you will be blocked from editing. - Wikigi | talk to me | 18:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

April 2009 edit

 
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to VP-26, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: VP-26 was changed by 138.162.0.44 (u) (t) deleting 33231 characters on 2009-04-03T18:44:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:44, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

July 2009 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to USS Forrestal (CV-59). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -MBK004 03:41, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

September 2009 edit

  Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Radio. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Manway (talk) 15:18, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jason Campbell, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Saladin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 15:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively here, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did with this edit to User:Glane23. You may wish to read the introduction to editing for more information about Wikipedia. Thank you. Geoff Who, me? 16:53, 23 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:Glane23, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Geoff Who, me? 17:13, 23 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

February 2010 edit

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Roy Belton, you will be blocked from editing. CliffC (talk) 18:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Midnight Sun (novel) worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. MaenK.A.Talk 15:22, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michigan Wolverines football, you will be blocked from editing. Jweiss11 (talk) 02:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Norview High School. ActivExpressionSign! 03:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
Materialscientist (talk) 03:19, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

March 2010 edit

  Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kyle Busch. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Why Not A Duck 21:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dlohcierekim 14:08, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2010 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Solder, you will be blocked from editing. Wizard191 (talk) 18:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Philadelphia Eagles, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The Utahraptor Talk 16:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Military Sealift Command, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Falcon8765 (talk) 19:24, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

August 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Scion xB has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tyrol5 [Talk] 17:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

RLC circuit resonant frequency edit

Please see the discussion of this at Talk: RLC circuit#Natural frequency and resonant frequency, SpinningSpark 17:25, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Democracy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. –CWenger (talk) 22:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

September 2010 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hurricane Hugo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rami R 15:04, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mark May. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. January (Cassandra 73) talk 18:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2010 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cosmetic dentistry, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 15:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Brenda Song, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ~DC We Can Work It Out 17:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Medina has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. WAYNEOLAJUWON 15:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Menlo-Atherton High School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 15:57, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2010 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Photo booth has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://vigorotaku.blogspot.com/2010/11/photo-booth.html. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:39, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

January 2011 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Greenbackville, Virginia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pilch62 (talk) 20:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

February 2011 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Men in Black (film), you may be blocked from editing. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 15:14, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to E (mathematical constant), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 19:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

June 2011 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brown bear, you may be blocked from editing. CutOffTies (talk) 13:31, 24 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Armadillo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Vcelloho (talk) 20:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Bubonic plague, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Puffin Let's talk! 11:50, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2011 edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Wikipelli. I noticed that one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cruiser bicycle with this edit, appeared to be unconstructive, and I’ve reverted it. In the future, please use the sandbox for testing and be sure to provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Please feel free to ask me questions about editing Wikipedia (or anything else) on my talk page. Wikipelli Talk 13:41, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

November 2011 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Culture of Bahrain, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator talk 15:25, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ike Taylor, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — DeeJayK (talk) 22:54, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

January 2012 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Worth County High School, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Wiki13 (talk) 16:03, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

May 2012 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Adam Yauch, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 18:44, 4 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2012 edit

Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Use_of_classified_documents Hello71 (talk) 18:52, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brandon Dubinsky. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Resolute 15:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brandon Dubinsky, you may be blocked from editing. Mdann52 (talk) 16:25, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

August 2012 edit

  Hello, I'm Webclient101. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Kevin Kelly (politician) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Webclient101 (talk) 16:23, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Kelly (politician). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Webclient101 (talk) 16:50, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Kelly (politician), you may be blocked from editing. Webclient101 (talk) 16:55, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2012 edit

  Hello, I'm LlamaDude78. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ace Hood, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LlamaDude78 (talk) 18:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Trusilver. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kevin Kelly (politician), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Trusilver 17:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Norfolk Naval Shipyard because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 16:29, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2012 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Chester W. Nimitz, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yaush (talk) 22:16, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm O.Koslowski. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Armadillo, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, O.Koslowski (talk) 16:40, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hey, just to double check edit

Hi, 138. I saw your post on Jimbo's page, and I don't know about anyone else, but I do want to investigate this, so I'm cross-posting this on your talk page from Jimbo's. My initial thought is that you're misreading the edit history, but please correct me if I'm wrong. The thing is that the IP does have a post between F&A's and Resolute's, but you can see from the edit summary that the post was made to the section called "Electoral Commission RfC Closure", right above "Wikipedia:Bold". If you go to that section, you can see that the IP's comment is still there. I guess my question is: did you actually see the IP's comment in "Wikipedia:Bold", or are you just going on the edit history? If the latter, then I think the IP's edits are all accounted for, but if the former, then some dev somewhere has some 'splaining to do. (And of course, one way or another, it's neither your nor the original IP's fault!) Writ Keeper 21:25, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

No problem and I am glad to ses that someone appears to be taking the issue seriously rather than assuming that I am just some IP that doesn't know what I am talking about. Just as a general note, this is a proxy used by about 2/3rds of the US navy so if there are some bizarre edits or something strange appearing thats likely why. I clearly see the edit history and the string of about 25 revisions that Risker deleted. All of which are apparently missing from the associated discussions on Jimbo's talk page but of course I cannot prove that because I do not have access. All I know is that earlier today I saw a comment from another IP that caught my eye and then was gone so when I looked at the history I could see where Risker deleted it. The IP posted twice. Once to the "Electoral Commission RfC Closure" section and again to the "Wikipedia:Bold" section. You are correct that the IP does have a couple comments there but not enough. If you look at the page history and count the times that the IP edited, the number doesn't match the posts in the discussion. To answer your question more directely, yes I actually saw the edit and I can also tell by the edit history that there are things missing by counting the number of posts by section for the user. I also want to note that Jimbo's page is just a very high visibility example. It happens whenever a rev del is perfomed across multiple revisions that affects multiple discussions.
Basically the rev del tool is crap, it always has been and needs to be redesigned. When its used to delete a single revision it works pretty well but when its used to delete multiple revisions as was done on Jimbo's page it generally also causes collatoral damage to other discussions and comments that were done in between. When a rev del is performed the performer needs to review the edit history and restore the comments that do not meet the violation in a followup edit, but this rarely happens and isn't required. To answer the likely bewilderment in your thoughts, Yes I have edited for a long time, yes I am familiar with how these tools work, no I do not want to start editing actively again and no I do not want to login or create a new account. The only reason I even brought this up is because I have seen it a number of times and no one has mentioned it and I got tired of seeing nothing being done to fix it. 138.162.0.42 (talk) 21:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I believe you. Sorry for explaining in what's probably far too much detail for you at Jimbo's talk page; I assumed, and you know what they say when you assume. :P I gotta run this moment, but I'll take a closer look, comparing bytecounts and the like, when I next get a chance. Writ Keeper 21:52, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
No problem thanks for looking into it. Like I said I really don't have a dog in the fight (to pun Michael Vick) but thought I would bring it up. Frankly if I had known it would require this much an investment in time I probably wouldn't have. 138.162.0.46 (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

December 2012 edit

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion edit

Hello, 138.162.0.44. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:35, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

January 2013 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stereotypes of African Americans in the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:11, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Woodbridge, Virginia, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 02:09, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm ChrisGualtieri. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Romeo Santos because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:22, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2013 edit

  Hello, I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sikorsky CH-53 Sea Stallion, but you did not provide a reliable source. It's been removed, but you can re-add it with a a citation. Thank you. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm EricSerge. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jeremy Michael Boorda without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! EricSerge (talk) 02:22, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013 edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 18:22, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Kelly (politician) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. — MusikAnimal talk 18:28, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  JamesBWatson (talk) 18:43, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, United States Fleet Forces Command, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 15:53, 18 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

November 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Kevin Kelly (politician), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 18:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your edits to Kevin Kelly (politician) edit

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Kelly (politician) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Petrb (talk) 19:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Josve05a. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Kevin Kelly (politician), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. (tJosve05a (c) 21:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kevin Kelly (politician), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 16:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Kelly (politician) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 16:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

March 2014 edit

Please refrain from editing my user page. Daonguyen95 (talk) 18:00, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Daonguyen95, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NFLisAwesome (ZappaOMati's alternate account) 18:27, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

IronGargoyle (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply


May 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Explosive have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Explosive was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://cocommonlaw.wordpress.com/colorado-revised-statutes/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

May 2020 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hampton University has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:12, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Reply