Template talk:WikiProject Politics

WikiProject Politics

Main page + Talk Portal Talk Help Talk To do list Talk Recognized content Talk Departments Assessment Talk → Requests Talk Collaboration Talk Peer review Talk Project organization Article alerts Talk Participants Talk Deletion sorting Stubs Talk New articles Talk Project banner Talk Project category Talk Unreferenced BLPs Talk Task forces American politics Talk Corporatism Talk Fascism Talk Money and politics Talk Liberalism Talk Oligarchy Talk Political parties Talk Gun politics Talk Related projects Australian politics Talk Capitalism Talk Chinese politics Talk Conservatism Talk European Union Talk Libertarianism Talk Law Talk Socialism Talk Voting Systems Talk Elections and Referendums Talk Indian politics Talk New Zealand politics Pakistani politics UK politics Talk UK Parliament constituencies US Congress U.S. Supreme Court Cases U.S. Government U.S. presidential elections view · edit · changes

List-class articles

There is no automatic category for List-class politics articles, maybe this should be fixed... - Ilse@ 15:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Bug reports

There are a couple of bug reports in a template that transcludes this one, that look relevant. Template talk:WikiProject Political parties. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:43, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

No importance code for task force articles

moved from Template talk:WikiProject Political parties and followed up here

(The task force template) also fails for apparently correct importance=low. The categorization is correct, but the presentation omits the importance. See for example: [1] --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

@Hroðulf: It was removed at 15:51, 19 February 2015. You should ask Jj98 (talk · contribs), who made that edit, why they "don't care". --Redrose64 (talk) 08:25, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

@Jj98: Does the removal of this parameter affect Wikipedia 1.0 ? Please either restore the importance code to the template, or update the wikiproject and template documentation, and post a bulletin at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics. The relevant documentation pages I checked before I reported this as a bug are at:

• Template:WikiProject Politics/doc
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics/Assessment

--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 15:40, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 11 April 2018

Add Gun politics task force. Proposed version can be seen at Template:WikiProject_Politics/sandbox. –dlthewave ☎ 14:47, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

 Not done for now: too much regression would result. Please base your changes on the current template, not one that is three years old. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

@Redrose64: I've updated the sandbox version with the current template, could you take a look at it again? This is my first template edit so any guidance would be appreciate. Thanks –dlthewave ☎ 01:30, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

OK,  Done --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Task force deprecation

According to this edit by Mr. Guye (talk · contribs), four of the task forces are defunct, hence the associated parameters are deprecated. Is there a proposal anywhere to remove these parameters from the template proper? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

@Redrose64 and Mr. Guye: I just made some changes to the template sandbox on this matter. It would seek to put the defunct task forces into the note section instead of side-by-side with the active ones. Would there be any objection to this change? –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:07, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 4 July 2019

There has been no objection to this change, so I'm going to assume that it's fine. Please, Copy and Paste code found at {{WikiProject Politics/sandbox}}. Cheers, –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:53, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

nvm. Let me make some changes. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:03, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 11 March 2020

Please sync with Sandbox. I've re-ordered the task forces and added a new WikiProject which has merged with WP:POLITICS –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 15:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

MJL, is there any particular reason for the rearrange, or is it just a convenient side effect of adding the new task force? What is the new order, and how is it different from the old? Primefac (talk) 17:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC) (please ping on reply)

@Primefac: I moved the inactive/defunct task forces to the bottom of the list (see above; this was easier than what I said I was going to do). –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 19:31, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

 Done Primefac (talk) 00:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 18 December 2020

Add alias for {{{American|}}} and {{{American-importance|}}} to support {{{American|{{{american|}}}}}} and {{{American-importance|{{{american-importance|}}}}}} –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 19:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

To MJL:  done, and thank you very much! P.I. Ellsworth  ed. ^put'r there 16:42, 21 December 2020 (UTC)