Talk:Ysleta Mission

Untitled

• the oldest continuously cultivated plot of land in the United States. Is this because the inhabitants of Acoma, New Mexico, and Old Oraibi, Arizona, are "Indians" and don't count? Wikipedia has an article Oldest buildings in the United States.--Wetman (talk) 03:46, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure what you mean by "indians"? It's evident you did not read the article otherwise you'd know that the Ysleta Mission was established for and in the Tigua Pueblo who happen to be "indians"... texasPI ^TALK 21:57, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Click links. Compare dates.--Wetman (talk) 23:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

NRHP rating

I have to agree with RvanWinkle on the C rating for the NRHP project. I can't get the Historical marker links to work, but the claim "to have the oldest continuously cultivated plot of land in the United States" seems exceptionally dubious. I want to know more about the move from Isleta - what happened during this period, the founding years of the mission? There's info on the drawings at the LOC site that could be included. Also some of the photos there are much better than the ones that were included here. Information from the NRHP nomination form (the one thing I could get to work at the Texas Historical Commission site) could be more fully included. Much of the info I could check is from newspapers and the magazine. Is there any info on this from books? Please try google books and archive.com.

A lot of work obviously went into this article. A bit more, with a less promotional tone could easily get it to a B. Smallbones (talk) 15:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

"The Mission today" section is missing a citation for the last sentence. Otherwise, I would rate this class B. It might also be a good idea to expand the intro paragraph by about 2 sentences. This is a nice article. Djmaschek (talk) 05:57, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ysleta Mission. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110721060410/http://nrhp.focus.nps.gov/natregsearchresult.do?fullresult=true&recordid=0 to http://nrhp.focus.nps.gov/natregsearchresult.do?fullresult=true&recordid=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Ow

You should add if this mission had any canons 69.55.194.94 (talk) 21:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)