Talk:Yoel Judah

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Miscellaneous section edit

I think this section should be deleted. The 'avowed' and 'black jew' claims are unsupported. The fact that his family has declared itself jewish and that he is an israelite can be stated in the lead. If there is a reliable source for the 'best jewish fighter of all time' claim, that can go in the career section. Finally, a section entitled 'Miscellaneous' is stylistically inappropriate. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 14:20, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unsupported, or unsupportable? If they can be supported, they certainly should not be deleted. If you question their veracity, and have not seen (or looked for, and don't wish to look for) a fact tag would be appropriate in lieu of a deletion. But actually, I thought I had left you RS support -- so am puzzled by your comment. If you know there is RS support, why would you here speak as though none exists?
As to format, I'm open for the information being kept under any section title that is more appropriate -- perhaps Heritage, or Religion.--Epeefleche (talk) 11:33, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
The israelite part is supported but I haven't seen an RS for 'black jew' (black, yes, jew, yes, but 'black jew' no). Unless 'black jew' is an acceptable term for jews who are black, in which case I apologize (I don't know much about this). My suggestion is that, either way, the lead be rewritten as "Yoel Judah (born 1956?) is the eldest member of the Brooklyn-based Judah boxing family. He is the trainer and manager of his sons Zab Judah, Daniel Judah, and Josiah Judah. Judah belongs to an African-American jewish family and is an israelite.(citation: the nytimes reference)." Then, assuming that the greatest jewish fighter of all time is supportable, that statement be moved up to the boxing career section. That way we don't have a miscellaneous section. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 12:59, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
No apology necessary. Yes, one use is as in Black Jew.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:06, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Possible copyright problem edit

 

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Yoel Judah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply