This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I'm inclined to agree with the now blocked paid/organisational account (about removing the latter paragraph about departing editors starting up a new section). Obviously not because they don't want it, but I do think it's only got about 10 words linking it specifically to Yes! Weekly in the source, and it's both UNDUE and doesn't really inform us about Yes! Weekly.
It's right that it's in the Triad City Beat article, but I don't feel it belongs here. @Drmies and Lcodyh803: - thoughts otherwise? Nosebagbear (talk) 13:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
After looking at it, I agree with you Nosebagbear. It's definitely more relevant for the Triad City Beat article to link here than the other way around. Lcodyh803 (talk) 15:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Nosebagbear, I'm fine with whatever you think is right. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 16:12, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
