Talk:Yanfeng Global Automotive Interior Systems

Notability

You moved this out of draft space and someone came along a few minutes later and tagged it for a speedy. IMO it is rather spammy. What was your thinking on this? I took the speedy tag off to buy some time for review. UninvitedCompany 21:24, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

It's not a WP:MILL company "Yanfeng Automotive Interiors has 110 manufacturing plants and technical centers in 20 countries and 33,000 employees. Turnover is approximately USD 8.8 billion" It is a huge. According to a 2017 report the company is the 32nd largest automotive parts supplier (all types of automotive parts) in the world, and second largest in China. [www.berylls.com/wp-content/uploads/.../20180704_Studie_Top_100_2018_EN.pdf] It's fairly new because of a merger. At some point companies get big enough that they are notable. This story cites it as the largest automotive interior business in the world [1] so if any company making interiors is notable than this is a valid topic. Thank-you for taking the time to ask me about the approval and shame on the tagger (whoever that was) who can't tell notable from WP:MILL Legacypac (talk) 02:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Inappropriate removal of improvements

What the heck is this? [2] reverting all my improvements to the page? What do you mean "emailed to Arb"? What does an Arb have to do with anything here? Legacypac (talk) 03:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Legacypac, it probably has to do with the paid editing notice you removed. Bradv🍁 03:53, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Partially but the other editor had nothing posted on this talkpage and still has not posted any proof here. They just mocked my improvements to the page. User_talk:Praxidicae#Reversion_of_good_edits Legacypac (talk) 06:36, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Legacypac, I see the "editing" by Praxidicae and Winged Blades as really inappropriate, nearly a vandalism. What remained from the relatively comprehensive encyclopedic entry? A poor stub. Might the gentlemen revert their devastating work...ChJn (talk) 22:13, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

ChJn, the present article is of about the same length as your only contribution to it, this. After your edit, an IP added a lot of spammy content, parts of it copied directly from the company's publicity materials. I'd have thought you'd be pleased to see that that low-quality content had been removed. Do you have some connection to the company, by the way? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:03, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Justlettersandnumbers Hello, I do not consider this as "my" article since it was deliberately marked as "promotion, to be deleted speedily," then restored (thanks to L.), renamed, two times substantially expanded, then devastated and again reduced. The current version is even smaller than the stub I wrote at first. Where got the info about Johnson Seating lost? And the product portfolio? I liked the subsequent expansions, but surely, a direct citing of copyrighted or company material must be avoided. Deleting is of course easier than rewriting. And, by the way, I am neither a fan of any Chinese company nor dependent of them. But something so big can hardly be ignored. Should we rely solely on Google when trying to decipher the code YFAI?ChJn (talk) 23:48, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.yfai.com/sites/yfai_corporate/files/presskit-yfai-iaa2017_english.pdf, https://www.yfai.com/en/about-us, https://www.yfai.com/en/our-history. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:58, 22 December 2018 (UTC)