Talk:Wonderful Pretty Cure!
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
On 21 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Wonderful Precure!. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Friendly “Tact” or “Wand”?
editSo, according to Crunchyroll, that they are referring the Friendly Tact as a “wand”, despite referring Delicious Party’s Party Candle Tact as a “tact”, and it’s 8th episode title translating Oishina Town as “Delicious Town”, but still uses said original name for the subtitles. In addition, I heard Crunchyroll is using artificial intelligence for their subtitles 2600:8801:42A:D200:566:36E4:9F2C:F930 (talk) 15:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- So, I searched up and turns out Crunchyroll isn’t using AI on subtitles. In addition, I think you are referring the changes to the episode descriptions; apparently Crunchyroll is referring Tropical-Rouge’s Grand Ocean as “Gran Ocean” for both episode titles and subtitles, despite articles covering the series still referring it by the said original name for the character descriptions and episode descriptions. With this, it seems that this discussion would be over implanting the word “tact” over “wand” for episode descriptions.
Edit: The episode description edits are implanted; although we’ll see if other users here will accept the name changes. 2600:8801:42A:D200:91C:B86B:63BC:8F19 (talk) 06:11, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 21 May 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 21:35, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wonderful Pretty Cure! → Wonderful Precure!
- List of Wonderful Pretty Cure! episodes → List of Wonderful Precure! episodes
– Crunchyroll's official title. [1] HelloYu0910 (talk) 08:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 10:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 08:00, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- The wiki fandom has named it Wonderful Pretty Cure! Even the Soaring Sky! Pretty Cure is named pretty cure. Even though it's named Soaring Sky! PreCure on Crunchyroll Anime1990 (talk) 23:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Besides PreCure is a short name for Pretty Cure Anime1990 (talk) 23:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- A lot of the previous Pretty Cure series are named Pretty Cure even though it's called PreCure Anime1990 (talk) 00:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fandom wiki is not a reliable source. HelloYu0910 (talk) 13:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- According to the Google search, the result number under "Wonderful Precure!" is 7,180,000 [2] As for "Wonderful Pretty Cure!", the result number is 68,800,000 [3]. Beside that, the logo on the original title also have "Wonderful Precure!" as its' English title. HelloYu0910 (talk) 13:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fandom wiki is not a reliable source. HelloYu0910 (talk) 13:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Extended back and forther between HelloYu0910 and Anime1990; collapsed to make it easier for uninvolved editors to participate. BilledMammal (talk) 08:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
- Oppose Renaming one series should be made to be consistent with the entire Pretty Cure/Precure franchise. An RM should extend to all of them and establish that Precure is the common name of the franchise and whatever exceptions need to be made. Each article's body text would require updating to reflect any name changes and also list the unshortened name. ― Synpath 23:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with this. Having one page change its name would create inconsistencies. Historyday01 (talk) 14:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support based on WP:COMMONNAME used by reliable English sources. "Wonderful PreCure" is the name used by Crunchyroll,[13][14] Anime News Network,[15][16] Comic Book Resources,[17] Otaku USA,[18] and Time of India.[19] I have not found a single reliable English language source that uses "Wonderful Pretty Cure" as the English title. All the hits that do come up are user-generated forums and wikis and unscrupulous retail sites selling potentially bootleg items. Finally, what titles the other series use should depend on what reliable English-language sources use. For some, that would be Pretty Cure. For most of the rest, it will be PreCure. There is no requirement to arbitrarily dictate a consistent naming convention for all franchise series articles, especially when reliable English-language sources use no consistent naming convention from series to series. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 23:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am sure @HelloYu0910 wanted to have consistent naming for Pretty Cure series even if we have to change some Pretty Cure to PreCure we might have to the change the franchise name of Pretty Cure to PreCure to make it consistent and the characters title of Pretty Cure to PreCure. Anime1990 (talk) 05:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Anime1990 I think you get the wrong idea. I actually just simply want to let Precure series matches it official title, and that is what I want to talk about for a very long time. HelloYu0910 (talk) 08:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am sure @HelloYu0910 wanted to have consistent naming for Pretty Cure series even if we have to change some Pretty Cure to PreCure we might have to the change the franchise name of Pretty Cure to PreCure to make it consistent and the characters title of Pretty Cure to PreCure. Anime1990 (talk) 05:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Extended back and forther between HelloYu0910 and Anime1990; collapsed to make it easier for uninvolved editors to participate. BilledMammal (talk) 08:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
- Relisting comment: Relisting for additional participation; Anime1990 and HelloYu0910 I suggest you step back from this discussion, to allow others the chance to participate. BilledMammal (talk) 08:00, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have to agree. My view on not changing the name remains the same as it was in that previous discussion. The sources cited above include unreliable sources and I'm not convinced that "PreCure" is the common name. Historyday01 (talk) 14:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- You claim that you don't believe any of the English-language sources I posted above are reliable, what is your evidence and what reliable English-language sources do you have to support your claim that "Wonderful Pretty Cure" is the common English name? Secondly, if the series is inconsistent between using "Pretty Cure" or "PreCure" in its English language titles, that is not something for Wikipedia to "correct". Article titles should follow WP:COMMONNAME, even if there is inconsistency from series to series. And using "Wonderful Pretty Cure" for the sake of "consistency" when no reliable English-language sources uses that title is a violation of WP:NOR. You are inventing a title based purely on your personal preference and not because it is the title used by reliable English-language sources. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 14:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Look at this link https://www.toei-animation-usa.com/pretty-cure.html it says pretty cure between / and .html that is why Wikipedia called the franchise name Pretty Cure Anime9000 (talk) 15:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Anime News Network is not reliable source as @Historyday01 said this: Additionally, the ANN encyclopedia isn't a reliable source. As it states on WP:A&M/ORS "Do not cite the user-edited encyclopedia database" Anime9000 (talk) 16:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- WP:OR.
- About ANN is not reliable source, it is only because you gived encyclopedia link not news. HelloYu0910 (talk) 16:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- For exmaple,
- [48] is a news which is fine, consider WP:ANIMENEWSNETWORK said so.
- As for the encyclopedia, due to WP:ANIMENEWSNETWORK said "Do not cite the user-edited encyclopedia database or any articles marked as advertorial.", which lend to news is an reliable source while encyclopedia database not. HelloYu0910 (talk) 16:17, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I only see "Wonderful Precure!" on the page you linked. Yes, the franchise as a whole is called "Pretty Cure" in English, but the use of "Pretty Cure" and "Precure" is inconsistent, even on the official website. Therefore, article titles should be based on which version of the name is used by reliable English-language sources and not on personal preference. Changing all names to be consistent, even when it is not the WP:COMMONNAME, is not an improvement of the encyclopedia. Secondly, ANN's news and review section is a reliable source and has withstood multiple WP:RS/N and project discussions. Only the encyclopedia section is deemed unreliable due to being based on user generated content. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Anime News Network is not reliable source as @Historyday01 said this: Additionally, the ANN encyclopedia isn't a reliable source. As it states on WP:A&M/ORS "Do not cite the user-edited encyclopedia database" Anime9000 (talk) 16:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, my main issue is that if you name one page "PreCure" and the others "Pretty Cure", it creates inconsistency. I think there should be a RfC on Talk:Pretty Cure instead about whether to use "PreCure" or "Pretty Cure". My personal preference doesn't matter here. Otherwise, it seems we are going in circles are not going anywhere, and the same people are discussing it without those from outside this discussion, which is unfortunate. Historyday01 (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- The "inconsistency" of the titles aren't a problem. And we shouldn't be inventing titles just to make things "consistent" when those titles aren't used by reliable English=language sources per WP:COMMONNAME. Policy and guidelines trumps personal preferences with regards to article titles and content. And your expressed desire for "consistency" with article where none exists in reliable English-language sources is a personal preference. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 16:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with you that existing sources can be inconsistent in their use of PreCure and Pretty Cure, as the Toei Animation page on the series makes that clear. At the same time, I'd also say that means even more than this should be decided in a way that effects ALL the Pretty Cure pages (this is what @― Synpath said earlier, which noting: "An RM should extend to all of them and establish that Precure is the common name of the franchise and whatever exceptions need to be made. Each article's body text would require updating to reflect any name changes and also list the unshortened name"), no just one. A requested move or RfC would work. In terms of personal preference, I will say that I don't personally care which one is used (when I said "I'm not convinced that "PreCure" is the common name" I was basing that on the sources which have been cited in this discussion, not elsewhere). Instead, I'd like to be done in the right way... I did attempt to get more people to comment on this discussion by posting on relevant projects, although I'm not sure that worked. Historyday01 (talk) 16:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- If there is to be a consistent standard applied to all articles within the franchise, it should be, "The title should reflect the WP:COMMONNAME as used by reliable English-language sources, whether that be 'PreCure' or 'Pretty Cure'." Whether that leads to different titles being used between different articles within the franchise is not a problem so long Wikipedia's policy and guidelines are followed. Trying to invent novel titles for the sake of consistency is not an improvement of the encyclopedia. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 16:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- LOL. I'm not trying to invent anything, I just think it would cause confusion to have different titles within the same franchise. If you truly believe that there are reliable English-language sources which show "Wonderful PreCure" is the preferred name, please provide them, because the ones I have seen so far are wholly inadequate. Historyday01 (talk) 19:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I already gave a number of links to reliable English-language sources using the title "Wonderful PreCure" for the series title, yet you still refuse to accept any of them. I've also looked and have yet to find a single reliable English-language source using the title "Wonderful Pretty Cure". The best I can manage are places quoting Wikipedia and bootleg sellers. If you believe that "Wonderful Pretty Cure" is the common name, do provide a number of sources supporting it. Otherwise "Wonderful Pretty Cure" is nothing more than an invented title based on original research, specifically WP:SYNTH. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 20:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- LOL. I'm not trying to invent anything, I just think it would cause confusion to have different titles within the same franchise. If you truly believe that there are reliable English-language sources which show "Wonderful PreCure" is the preferred name, please provide them, because the ones I have seen so far are wholly inadequate. Historyday01 (talk) 19:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- If there is to be a consistent standard applied to all articles within the franchise, it should be, "The title should reflect the WP:COMMONNAME as used by reliable English-language sources, whether that be 'PreCure' or 'Pretty Cure'." Whether that leads to different titles being used between different articles within the franchise is not a problem so long Wikipedia's policy and guidelines are followed. Trying to invent novel titles for the sake of consistency is not an improvement of the encyclopedia. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 16:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with you that existing sources can be inconsistent in their use of PreCure and Pretty Cure, as the Toei Animation page on the series makes that clear. At the same time, I'd also say that means even more than this should be decided in a way that effects ALL the Pretty Cure pages (this is what @― Synpath said earlier, which noting: "An RM should extend to all of them and establish that Precure is the common name of the franchise and whatever exceptions need to be made. Each article's body text would require updating to reflect any name changes and also list the unshortened name"), no just one. A requested move or RfC would work. In terms of personal preference, I will say that I don't personally care which one is used (when I said "I'm not convinced that "PreCure" is the common name" I was basing that on the sources which have been cited in this discussion, not elsewhere). Instead, I'd like to be done in the right way... I did attempt to get more people to comment on this discussion by posting on relevant projects, although I'm not sure that worked. Historyday01 (talk) 16:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- The "inconsistency" of the titles aren't a problem. And we shouldn't be inventing titles just to make things "consistent" when those titles aren't used by reliable English=language sources per WP:COMMONNAME. Policy and guidelines trumps personal preferences with regards to article titles and content. And your expressed desire for "consistency" with article where none exists in reliable English-language sources is a personal preference. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 16:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Look at this link https://www.toei-animation-usa.com/pretty-cure.html it says pretty cure between / and .html that is why Wikipedia called the franchise name Pretty Cure Anime9000 (talk) 15:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- You claim that you don't believe any of the English-language sources I posted above are reliable, what is your evidence and what reliable English-language sources do you have to support your claim that "Wonderful Pretty Cure" is the common English name? Secondly, if the series is inconsistent between using "Pretty Cure" or "PreCure" in its English language titles, that is not something for Wikipedia to "correct". Article titles should follow WP:COMMONNAME, even if there is inconsistency from series to series. And using "Wonderful Pretty Cure" for the sake of "consistency" when no reliable English-language sources uses that title is a violation of WP:NOR. You are inventing a title based purely on your personal preference and not because it is the title used by reliable English-language sources. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 14:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have to agree. My view on not changing the name remains the same as it was in that previous discussion. The sources cited above include unreliable sources and I'm not convinced that "PreCure" is the common name. Historyday01 (talk) 14:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Arbitrary break
edit- The same can be said to Soaring Sky Pretty Cure because it's named PreCure in Toei Animation website but no one wants to move it PreCure even @Historyday01 doesn't agree with the move Anime9000 (talk) 00:55, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- A lot of the Pretty Cure All Stars movies in Wikipedia from this link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Cure_All_Stars does not follow the WP:COMMONNAME based on this link: https://www.toei-animation-usa.com/pretty-cure.html at the bottom of the page except for the one that was released in 2016 called PRETTY CURE ALL STARS
- SING TOGETHER MIRACLE MAGIC Anime9000 (talk) 16:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I said it once, said it twice, and many times already. But, here, I will just repeat it again, just change it if it doesn't based on WP:COMMONNAME. Not hard at all. HelloYu0910 (talk) 17:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- But if someone changes it will get changed back to Pretty Cure Anime9000 (talk) 17:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Chief among them @Historyday01, who moved a number of Precure articles to "Pretty Cure" during the course of this discussion in assert their personal preference for "consistency" rather than based on the title used by reliable English-language sources. All of those other moves should be undone. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 17:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Again, it wasn't about a "personal preference," I moved them because it seemed wrong to have ONE page be different, and the fact that the page move was done without any discussion. I stand by my move and wouldn't do it any differently. We need to have a discussion about ALL the Pretty Cure pages, not just this one. To move this one, and NOT the others, without a discussion, would be inconsistent. The last thing we want to do is confuse people reading these pages. Historyday01 (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- "I moved them because it seemed wrong to have ONE page be different,"
- That is a personal preference and one not supported by Wikipedia policies, guidelines, or reliable English-langauge sources. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 20:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Again, it wasn't about a "personal preference," I moved them because it seemed wrong to have ONE page be different, and the fact that the page move was done without any discussion. I stand by my move and wouldn't do it any differently. We need to have a discussion about ALL the Pretty Cure pages, not just this one. To move this one, and NOT the others, without a discussion, would be inconsistent. The last thing we want to do is confuse people reading these pages. Historyday01 (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Chief among them @Historyday01, who moved a number of Precure articles to "Pretty Cure" during the course of this discussion in assert their personal preference for "consistency" rather than based on the title used by reliable English-language sources. All of those other moves should be undone. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 17:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- But if someone changes it will get changed back to Pretty Cure Anime9000 (talk) 17:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I said it once, said it twice, and many times already. But, here, I will just repeat it again, just change it if it doesn't based on WP:COMMONNAME. Not hard at all. HelloYu0910 (talk) 17:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: For all participants here, specifically @216.30.147.90, @HelloYu0910, @―Synpath, @HelloYu0910, @User:Blackgaia02, @Shadow, and @BilledMammal, I have posted a RfC at Talk:Pretty Cure#"Pretty Cure" or "PreCure"?, asking for comments on whether to use Pretty Cure or PreCure for all related pages, based on the above discussion. I see no point in participating in this specific discussion again, as it is going in circles, and I will not be changing my opinion either.--Historyday01 (talk) 20:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Italics
editWhy is the opening paragraph in Italic? I tried to fix it but I don't think it worked. 2601:547:CC80:4F00:248C:67D2:B55E:6F5F (talk) 20:13, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- There was an extra ' 182.239.93.153 (talk) 02:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Okay. I didn't notice. 2601:547:CC80:4F00:FC8A:DF36:C6F3:F121 (talk) 11:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Topic about their own movie
editSo Toei just announced that they will have their own movie titled Wonderful Precure The Movie! Doki Doki ♡ Grand Adventure in the Game World! (in Japanese is called わんだふるぷりきゅあ!ざ・むーびー! ドキドキ♡ゲームの世界で大冒険! in Kana and Wandafuru Purikyua Za Mūbī! Dokidoki ♡ Gemu no Sekai de Daiboken! according to Hepburn writing). Is it plausible to add it? Nobi-Wiki (talk) 07:32, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Daifuku
editWhere did the information about him having Satoru's surname come from? 73.79.229.7 (talk) 12:26, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Spoilers
editI added information about Satoru and Daifuku's forms in the movie, but I am worried that it is too early to add this information since the movie was just released today, even though there are official sources reporting about it. 2601:547:CC80:4F00:F44F:C41:C867:DAE5 (talk) 17:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)