| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wolfs (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 19 September 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Wolfs. The result of the discussion was Wolfs (film) not moved, Wolfs moved, DAB page created in place.. |
title incorrect
editthe movie is called "wolfs"
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt15489576/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0 207.34.44.70 (talk) 18:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- IMDb depends on user contributions, like Wikipedia. See WP:IMDB. We need to wait until a reliable source reports a title change. Mike Allen 19:10, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Filming
editPlease find reliable sources about the film after the conclusion of the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. The Media Expert (talk) 00:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Official poster
editPlease upload the official poster of Wolfs to Wikipedia. The Media Expert (talk) 23:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Title
editGiven the strange title of the movie, it would be nice if it could be explained (with citation). Kdammers (talk) 18:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- I dont have a citation, but I thought it was obviously a hommage to Pulp Fiction, where Mr. Wolf was the legendary "fixer". Hence, these two guys are Wolfs. 2A01:C23:9166:500:6110:E7D0:40C8:882D (talk) 11:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. that sounds likely. I found this in the NYT review: "Clooney and Pitt play underworld fixers, the kind of misterioso professionals whom people with power and money hire to clean up their messes. Much like the character in Quentin Tarantino’s “Pulp Fiction” played by Harvey Keitel — named Winston Wolfe but known as the Wolf — the fixers here swoop in and, with some elbow grease and a duffel bag large enough to hold a body, discreetly make the problem go away, or that’s the idea. Tarantino’s influence is conspicuous throughout “Wolfs,”" -- Is that enough to cite, or is it too thin? Kdammers (talk) 21:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 19 September 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Wolfs (film) not moved, Wolfs moved, DAB page created in place. (closed by non-admin page mover) Sennecaster (Chat) 00:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
– Primary topic per pageviews.[1] 162 etc. (talk) 04:36, 19 September 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ASUKITE 15:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support or at least DAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wolfs → Wolfs (surname), oppose Wolfs (film) → Wolfs. "Wolfs" is such a plausible misspelling of "Wolves" that Wolfs should either become a disambiguation page (preferred) or, at the very least, a redirect towards Wolf (disambiguation) (not preferred since "Wolfs" is a misspelling of "Wolves".) Steel1943 (talk) 19:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 1st, Support 2nd and redirect Wolfs to Wolf as clear primary redirect. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:12, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I think there is enough likelihood of the incorrect plural to make no primary topic given that although the 1st Google results are for the film there are several results for the animal further down so at least I'd say no primary topic though a case could perhaps be made for the animal to be primary per WP:PLURALPT. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Comedy and WikiProject Film have been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE 15:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Relisting comment: So far we have support to move the surname, now looking to see if it is preferred to redirect Wolfs to Wolf (Wolf (disambiguation) would be a double-redirect), or something else ASUKITE 15:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wolf (disambiguation) is the title of a DAB not a redirect so there would be no double redirect issue. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 1st, support 2nd, support DAB, oppose primary redirect. No primary topic for "Wolfs", especially not an incorrect plural. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:32, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.