Talk:Wolfram von Richthofen

Latest comment: 6 days ago by Grassynoel in topic War crimes analysis

Section on Guernica

edit

Perhaps this is just me but it seems a little...partisan, I suppose? Does it in its current state fit within Wikipedia's guidelines or is something amiss? Not accusing anyone, but it seems especially crafted to make Guernica seem like "no big deal" by only citing one, very conservative, figure of the casualties and over-all it strikes me as having a specific prerogative on the part of the author.

A date

edit
  • Appears in the Genealogisches Handbuch des Adels, Band XIX (1996), s. 230. WIth these dates. - Nunh-huh 21:10, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Changes recently

edit

The lead does not repeat itself. The reputation part has not been completed yet. Dapi89 (talk)•

War crimes analysis

edit

Whether he was guilty of war crimes is moot. Along with the rest of the Wehrmacht during the war, he is guilty of waging a war of aggression. This is a crime against humanity as laid down at Nuremberg. There, for various reasons, only the very top commanders were charged. Grassynoel (talk) 01:46, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply