Talk:Winston Tunnel

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Steelkamp in topic GAR
Former good articleWinston Tunnel was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 5, 2006Good article nomineeListed
August 15, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
February 6, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Specs

edit

Those specs are crying out for an infobox... I'll try to find an appropriate one and move them there. —Rob (talk) 20:08, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

I'm gonna fix these references to bring them into line with Wikipedia standards. Soon. Gws57 15:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

NOT the longest railroad tunnel in Illinois

edit

The Canadian National has a tunnel over one mile long on the former Illinois Central line known as the Edgewood Cutoff in southern Illinois. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.153.115.152 (talk) 23:35, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Winston Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:02, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

GAR

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: No improvements within the past week. Steelkamp (talk) 14:05, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Possible reassessment requested since March last year. The article contains some uncited text, and doesn't have an update after ~2006. Is DNR still "developing the area with nature trails and other improvements"? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 14:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.