Talk:Windows Push Notification Service

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Carbrera in topic GA Review
Good articleWindows Push Notification Service has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 14, 2016Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 22, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Windows Push Notification Service allows developers to send push data to Windows desktop and mobile applications?

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Windows Push Notification Service/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 16:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Reply


Infobox edit

  • The image of the "Overview of the WNS architecture" needs an alt image description; please add one

Lead edit

  • Remember: Anything that is mentioned in the lead needs to be mentioned in the article; the facts about "it was first supported on Windows 8 and subsequently on Windows Phone 8.1 upon its release." is cited wonderfully here, but it needs to be brought up in the article as well
  • Same with Reference #2 please

Technical details edit

Design and compatibility edit

  • No source for the "The service changes are expected to be released alongside an anniversary update to Windows 10." statement

Architecture edit

  • Great work; nothing to add!

References edit

  • The "Reflist" parameters should be changed to "Reflist|30em"; please do this to prevent extra space in this section
  • Overlinking issues:
  • Reference #2 – Unlink "Microsoft" please
  • Reference #3 – Unlink "Microsoft" please
  • Reference #8 – Unlink "Microsoft" please

End of GA Review: edit

Short and sweet: a good and quick read! Great work! The article will be placed on hold for seven days to allow for any changes to be made. If you have a question for me regarding this review, feel free to @PING me and I'll respond and I'm sure I will respond swiftly. Thanks! Cheers, Carbrera (talk) 21:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC).Reply

Hi Carbrera - I've had a go at fixing the issues you've identified - any further feedback would be welcome! Mike1901 (talk) 21:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your quick response; quick's the wrong word–more like immediate (a whopping 17 minutes!) I have passed the article now and appreciate your improvements. Cheers, Carbrera (talk) 03:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC).Reply