Talk:William More (bishop)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Andrewa in topic Requested move 12 December 2016
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Requested move 12 December 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: pages moved. Andrewa (talk) 06:39, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
– No indication that the bishop is more sought after than all the combined other uses of this name. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 04:15, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- Support - the bishop doesn't appear to meet the requirements of PRIMARYTOPIC and if anything the More (1600) received twice the page views, meager as they are. Tiggerjay (talk) 01:03, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.