Talk:William Henry Harrison III

Latest comment: 3 years ago by SerAntoniDeMiloni in topic GA Review

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:08, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that William Henry Harrison III and William Henry Harrison served simultaneously in the Wyoming House of Representatives and both had sons named William Henry Harrison?"Two William Henry Harrisons in House". Casper Star-Tribune. January 12, 1945. p. 5. Archived from the original on May 7, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.

5x expanded by Jon698 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:05, 13 May 2020 (UTC).Reply


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.
Overall:   epicgenius (talk) 23:17, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:William Henry Harrison III/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk · contribs) 16:34, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


Hi again Jon698, I'll also be reviewing this one of your nominations. Looks well written so far. I'll read through and make suggestions for improvement in order to get to GA. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 16:34, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

- I've attached the pre-review feedback below. It would be great if you could respond to each point. Thanks SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 20:13, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Review edit

Intro edit

  • Intro here is also quite short. Would it be possible to do the same longer intro as in the GA I just accepted?

Career edit

  • It may be worth rewording "On December 2, 1931, he was elected as president of the Universal Club which held its meetings at the Columbia Club, which was formed by local Republicans who had supported the presidential campaign of Benjamin Harrison." as well as elaborating as to what it was?

Rest is all fine.

Images edit

  • Are there any more images of him/acts he was involved in available online? These would help compliment the article.

References edit

  • These seem fine. No problems here.

Overall edit

Well written. The intro could be expanded, as was done in Fielding L. Wright. A couple of other minor points, but this should be GA status if the above can be done. Best, SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 20:13, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jon698. I'll just put this on hold while you address the above :) SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 13:18, 20 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
@SerAntoniDeMiloni: Thank you for doing these reviews. I have added two images from his congressional career and I have lengthened the lead. What is your opinion on the article now? - Jon698 (talk) 00:29 21 June 2020 (UTC)
@Jon698:. The article is definitely better. It may still be worth describing what the Universal Club is. I've just added the presidential link to the lead, as well as his post-politics. (Feel free to remove or change this) SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 09:56, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
@SerAntoniDeMiloni: I have added information about the Universal Club and approve of your edits. - Jon698 (talk) 08:15 24 June 2020 (UTC)
@Jon698: All looks good. I'd be happy to review now.

Review Final edit

Hi Jon698. Enjoy the GA!

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: