Talk:Werribee line
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Werribee line article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
.svg){kind=small} | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | On 17 July 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Werribee railway line to Werribee line. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Early text edit
The track distances in the box at the bottom are clearly wrong. How can Williams Landing be closer to Flinders Street than Aircraft? 121.214.40.102 (talk) 12:33, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
New Timetable for the Altona Branch. edit
There is a new timetale for this line, and all Altona shuttles are extend to Flinders Street. Could someone add that piece of info? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techie3 (talk • contribs) 11:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 17 July 2023 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Sourcing appears in support of the originally proposed move. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 (talk) 05:38, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Werribee railway line → Werribee line – WP:COMMONNAME swap with redirect ThylacineHunter (talk) 07:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: redirects are ineligible to be current titles in move requests, and there is no need to list the redirect, Werribee line, to be swapped. A title swap will happen automatically if the Werribee railway line article is moved as proposed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 19:54, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- Werribee line service, article is (or at least should) primarily be about a railway service, not a railway line. The railway lines on which the service operates are the City Loop and the Port Fairy railway line. Suggest alternative name to be clear that article is about a service. Bagufleat (talk) 03:57, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support Werribee line, oppose Werribee line service as per WP:COMMONNAME. Werribee line is the common name, as shown by [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. Is "Werribee line service" a name that is used anywhere? Steelkamp (talk) 04:43, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Xtrapolis 2.0 edit
Both this article and the Williamstown line article both suggest that the xtrapolis 2.0 are going to be introduced on both lines however there aren't any sources suggesting this. All sources I found (that include lines) only mention the Frankston, Craigieburn and Upfield lines
For some examples:
https://www.vic.gov.au/xtrapolis-modern-trains-modern-melbourne
https://www.railexpress.com.au/show-and-tell-for-xtrapolis-2-0-train-mock-up/
https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/melbournes-newest-trains-track-ahead
Even the wikipedia article for the X'Trapolis 2.0 have no mention of the Werribee/Williamstown lines NotOrrio (talk) 22:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)