Talk:Water (Kanye West song)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by LOVI33 in topic GA Review
Good articleWater (Kanye West song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starWater (Kanye West song) is part of the Jesus Is King series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 3, 2020Good article nomineeListed
November 24, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Water (Kanye West song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LOVI33 (talk · contribs) 03:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hey Kyle Peake, I will start my review now. LOVI33 03:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Infobox and lead

edit
  Done for the above even though I had already set these credits properly before this edit switched things around --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "Clemons and West had a conversation about Jesus, which the song came from" → "The song came from a conversation between Clemons and West about Jesus"
  Done --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Background and recording

edit
  • First paragraph is really long, maybe split it up into a few?
  Done how's that look? --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Done --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Composition and lyrics

edit
  • Looks Good!

Release and promotion

edit
  • No problems found, looks good!

Critical reception

edit
  • Looks good!

Commercial performance

edit
  • "entered at number 51 on the US Billboard Hot 100" → "entered the US Billboard Hot 100 at number 51"
  • "the track gave Clemons his first appearance on the Hot 100" → "the track gave Clemons his first appearance on the chart"
  Done --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Credits and personnel

edit
  • Change title to just "Personnel," "Credits and personnel" is used when there are recording locations involved
Are you sure about this? I was thinking that stuff like "recording engineer", "associated performer" and "mastering engineer" makes it titled as of current? --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Okay fair enough, Keep it as is. LOVI33 13:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Charts

edit
  • Looks good!

Notes

edit
  • Looks good!

References

edit
  • ref 1 is a bare url, replace with a citation
  Not done I instead removed since it was added in the recent edit that changed the infobox --Kyle Peake (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit
  • Looks good!

Final comments and verdict

edit