Talk:Wang Zhong (Three Kingdoms)
(Redirected from Talk:Wang Zhong (Han dynasty))
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Andrewa in topic Requested move
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 18:15, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Wang Zhong (Han dynasty) → Wang Zhong – No other Wang Zhong has a page on Wikipedia. Timmyshin (talk) 06:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
- Question - are there any other meanings for "Wang Zhong" in Google Books? In ictu oculi (talk) 15:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
- The Chinese Wikipedia lists this many meanings for Wang Zhong https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%8E%8B%E5%BF%A0 _dk (talk) 19:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose, _dk Wang Zhong (Ming dynasty) now has a stub on en.wp. Zh.wp has one for the Ming marquis, but not for the Han dynasty figure on en.wp. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose. The new stub is a good one, barely but clearly passes notability guidelines, its creation should be commended. Give it time to grow, and there seem to be other people by that name as well. Andrewa (talk) 15:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Post RM edit
It should also be noted [1] that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Zhong (Ming dynasty), referred to above, has closed as keep, [2] despite the efforts of a now banned sockpuppet. Andrewa (talk) 16:38, 1 November 2014 (UTC)