Talk:Visions of Johanna

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 131.111.184.102 in topic "Royal Albert Hall" show
Good articleVisions of Johanna has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starVisions of Johanna is part of the Blonde on Blonde series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 8, 2011Good article nomineeListed
August 8, 2023Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Lyrics edit

Is it possible to put the extra lyrics from perth 1966 on this wiki page? The expecting rain site has never worked for me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.12.85 (talk) 19:50, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Royal Albert Hall" show edit

Is anyone sure that the official album was definitely erroneously titled "The Royal Albert Hall" show? Couldn't that be a jab at the bootleggers, who actually were erroneously titling the show?

I think everyone is sure it was titled that because of the famous bootleg and it is in quotation marks to signal the title is inaccurate as fact, but as myth it was believed by those unfamiliar with the work. The bootleggers knew. :-)

"It was recorded at the Manchester Free Trade Hall during Dylan's world tour in 1966, hence the quotation marks around the false attribution to the Royal Albert Hall."

https://www.discogs.com/Bob-Dylan-Live-1966-The-Royal-Albert-Hall-Concert/master/28288

131.111.184.102 (talk) 09:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Mercury sound edit

If I'm not mistaken, it's "thin, wild mercury sound" and not "wild, thin mercury sound". Confirm/deny?

famous lines? edit

"the ghost of electricity howls in the bones of her face."

that's not even the most famous line on the album. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.133.254.89 (talk) 07:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC).Reply

Yeah, the most famous BonB line is "I forced my hands in my pockets and felt with my thumbs, and gallantly handed her my very last piece of gum." --(cross references "Don't wanna be a bum you better chew gum" from Subterranean)

Sad shape of this article edit

This article consists almost entirely of original research, which is a pity, given the enormity of this song as work of music and poetry. I'm going to delete all the unsourced and poorly-written speculation and try to find some info about this song in the next few days--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 17:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

hey this is marcia a devoted bob dylan fan. this song being about drugs is idiotic. this is a story about what goes on while someone waits for johanna. the aura of bob dylan is that we will never know what he is talking about. he is a poet as well as a songwriter, musician, artist and a mystery.


The "australian" verse seems a little weird, is there any proof of this having been actually sung by Dylan ? The explanation about Johanna being Dylan's secretary is not supported by any kind of evidence either. Sounds like some guy made it up and posted it there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.103.40.50 (talk) 16:38, 20 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Close reading edit

Came across the following (web link here, and on main page [1])

'Visions of Infinity' by Jonny Thakkar, in The Owl Journal, Hilary Term '07.

You may disagree with it, but at least it provides a published baseline. Bob aka Linuxlad 07:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

The link I provided to this is now dead, though you can probably still get a pdf of the whole issue from the Owl Journal site. I've emailed the present editor to see if there is a better link still available. Bob aka Linuxlad (talk) 19:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've actually read that essay before and thought it was an excellent analysis of a difficult song. I've considered citing that same piece in this article; the problem is The Owl is essentially a student literary magazine--probably doesn't qualify as a reliable our authoritative source.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 21:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
The piece is already quoted in the main article (qv) :-). It's probably still available as long as you take the whole archived pdf. In the context quoted, not for a definitive reading but an informed traceable point of view, Thakkar's standing looks good enough - he is I think a post-grad student of several years experience, and an editor of the Owl mag from some years back. Certainly a notch up on the rambling home-spun rubbish that usually collects in WP's Dylan articles. Bob aka Linuxlad (talk) 09:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
With dozens of well-regarded books to draw on for the background and analysis of "Visions of Johanna", I don't think anyone has to dig down a couple layers to find reliable information. I realize the comments above are almost four years old, but recent activity indicates these possibilities are still being considered. Allreet (talk) 15:03, 16 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Music blonde on blonde.jpg edit

The image Image:Music blonde on blonde.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Visions of Johanna/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 13:33, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Excellent song. Will review it.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Good prose as usual
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    I think "epic" is a little bit povy
The only "epic" I see is this:
Bill Janovitz also emphasizes the urban, unreal quality of "Visions of Johanna", calling it a "sprawling epic".
But this is a direct quote from Janovitz, surely if it's a critic's opinion, it's not POV. Mick gold (talk) 18:08, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oh, now I see, "epic" has been removed. Mick gold (talk) 18:47, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  2. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  3. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  


  • ISBN check: ok
  • Dabsolver check: removed one dab
  • Checklinks check: ok
  • Reflinks check: ok
  • "Some of the New York recordings, released on bootleg recordings, have a faster tempo, and in the fifth verse contain the additional line "He examines the nightingale's code". " - maybe "Some of the New York recordings, released as bootlegs, were uptempo and contain in the fifth verse the additional line "He examines the nightingale's code".
I have changed it to very very close to what you suggested. Moisejp (talk) 15:55, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
ok
  • Do you mean New York = New York City?
I have added "City" to the lead. Moisejp (talk) 15:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • "listened closely to full studio tapes of the Blonde on Blonde sessions, and he describes how Dylan guided the New York backing musicians through fourteen takes" - reads better imho
Removed "he". Moisejp (talk) 15:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Maybe linking hard rock
Done. Moisejp (talk) 15:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • "Wilentz writes that the final, quieter New York takes are close in feel to the Nashville version which appears on the album.[5]" - Can you rewrite it? It sounds a little bit odd.
Mick gold, you have this source. Do you want to address this one? Thanks. Moisejp (talk) 15:55, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
OK, I've had a stab at re-writing, with a direct quote from Wilentz. Mick gold (talk) 18:08, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
good
  • Why do we need "(another character in the song)" if this was already explained?
Oops, that was my mistake. I had missed that Mick gold had already talked about Louise earlier on. I have now removed "another character in the son". Moisejp (talk) 15:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • It is the first time I see an audio file in an infobox.
"Like a Rolling Stone" has the audio file in the info box, and it seems to me I've seen it elsewhere as well. I've tentatively moved it out of the info box if you quite prefer it that way. But if you didn't really mind it in the info box, I thought the page layout was less cluttered with it there. Moisejp (talk) 15:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Much better now, especially as it is so big. Now it is a GA! Congrats ;) !
Many thanks for your review, Great Orange Pumpkin Mick gold (talk) 11:30, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks from me, too! Moisejp (talk) 14:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Old Crow Medicine Show cover edit

Old Crow Medicine Show covered this song on their latest album, 50 Years of Blonde on Blonde. I have tried to add this information to the "covers" portion of this article but, despite several modifications, the edit has been reverted by another editor. I am at a loss to understand why OCMS's cover does not merit mention alongside those of Lee Renaldo and Kåre Virud.... PurpleChez (talk) 15:47, 26 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

You need to take it to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs if you think you are going to get support. --Richhoncho (talk) 15:49, 26 August 2017 (UTC)Reply