Talk:Vishwaroopam

Latest comment: 2 years ago by FOARP in topic Requested move 14 October 2021

Requested move 14 October 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved - Havelock Jones argues persuasively that WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is governing in this case. Style guides are of course important but they do not over-ride a guideline that rests ultimately on WP:NPOV via WP:COMMONNAME. (non-admin closure) FOARP (talk) 18:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC) FOARP (talk) 18:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


– While by the pageviews, this article is the most viewed, MOS:FILM asks to disambiguate films with the same name with year — DaxServer (talk to me) 18:03, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

(Update: added soundtrack to RM 16:14, 16 October 2021 (UTC))
  • support all per nom. Also: when I hear "Vishwaroopam", the first thing that comes to mind is Vishvarupa, not the film. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook(talk) 17:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. This is the same misunderstanding as here. WP:PRIMARYFILM applies; to the extent that MOS:FILM contradicts WP:NCF, the latter should take precedence as a naming convention (to which MOS:FILM cross refers). As for usernamekiran, WP:NWFCTM applies. Havelock Jones (talk) 12:07, 6 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.