Talk:Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2008

http://www.reuters.com/article/homepageCrisis/idUSL06464748._CH_.2400 http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-01/07/content_7379534.htm http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/08/world/middleeast/08briefs-palestinians.html?ref=world http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/106271.html http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/07/world/middleeast/07mideast.html?ref=middleeast http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080115/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_palestinians —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shamir1 (talkcontribs) 06:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jD4YSkDPlclqd9dHvg2f0Ij18zEgD8U8CR382 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/world/middleeast/18mideast.html?ref=world —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shamir1 (talkcontribs) 18:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

http://www.dawn.com/2008/01/20/top9.htm http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/world/middleeast/20mideast.html?ref=middleeast http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-fg-gaza19jan19,1,884451.story?coll=la-news-a_section --Shamir1 (talk) 05:46, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jD4YSkDPlclqd9dHvg2f0Ij18zEgD8U9QHDG0 --Shamir1 (talk) 01:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Disgusting Level of Bias

edit

To be frank, this article is rubbish. Just like most of the other articles in this series, Palestinian civilians have systematically been omitted, whereas Israeli ones are mentioned in detail. The killing of 117 Palestinians in 7 days alone (Feb. 28 - Mar. 3), far more than the number of Israelis killed for the whole year, is buried in a couple of lines. The sourcing is bad as well. Buttockhat (talk) 16:17, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Associated Press, New York Times, Los Angeles Times... right... bad sources. Who would trust them for news? --Shamir1 (talk) 07:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I only edit this article on an occasional basis, adding usually whatever blurb pops up in the news. Whatever is reported is copied unto here. It is true that many Palestinians were killed this year. It is also true that most of them were militants and the vast majority (if not all) of civilian casualties were killed during the course of Israeli strikes on militants--and this included in the article. --Shamir1 (talk) 07:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I tend to agree with Shamir. Each death listed has about the same level of detail (e.g., 1 Israeli killed vs. 6 Palestinians killed). I do not see names, etc. provided in either case. The news reports appear to cover 100% of Israeli deaths and perhaps 80%-to-90% of the Palestians. There is less text per Palestinian death simply because they have a much higher relative death toll. The sources such as the Associated Press, New York Times, Los Angeles Times... are mainstream english language sources. In fact I consider NYT and LA Times to be left-of-center. On the face of it they are just fine.

Also, the Palestian attacks tend to be focused on civilians, which makes them more notable/news worthy. A good indication of this fact is that something like 25% of the Palestian deaths are female and around 50% of the Israel deaths are female (females are rarely combatants).

It would be useful to make sure that 100% of the Palestian deaths are covered. A good source for the deaths on both sides is the Btselem web site (see below). However, it would be difficult to link them to events and/or other news reports. On might do an update every month or three months. Ensuring a complete count of Palestian deaths would be a reasonable task for Buttockhat.

http://www.btselem.org/english/statistics/Index.asp

There is some ongoing work with dbpedia to provide a database-like (RDF) capability with Wikipedia, which should eventually be helpful. ITBlair (talk) 03:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The ideal would be something like the Iraqi Body Count Web site, but this would a huge amount of work. ITBlair (talk) 03:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you are going to give the motives for the Israeli airstrikes, then you should give the motives for the Palestinian attacks as well (retribution for Israeli retribution, alleged land theft, impoverishment, fudementalist Islamic philosophy, dehumanization of Israelis, so on and so forth).

Also, the Palestian attacks tend to be focused on civilians, which makes them more notable/news worthy. A good indication of this fact is that something like 25% of the Palestian deaths are female and around 50% of the Israel deaths are female (females are rarely combatants).

All the same, Israel's strikes are so much more powerful that through collateral damage they kill more civlians. Whatever their intended targets are, I think that on that basis Israel's strikes, at least collectively, deserve equal space.

As it is, this article reads a lot like an editorial. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.120.80.42 (talk) 00:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.examiner.com/a-1438829~Israeli_envoy_returns_without_Gaza_truce_deal.html?cid=rss-World
    Triggered by (?<=[/@.])examiner\.com(?:[:/?\x{23}]|$) on the local blacklist
  • http://www.examiner.com/a-1448552~Israel_Hamas_Gaza_truce_goes_into_effect.html?cid=rss-Top_News
    Triggered by (?<=[/@.])examiner\.com(?:[:/?\x{23}]|$) on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of violent incidents in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of violent incidents in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of violent incidents in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit

edit

Preserving here by providing this link. My rationale was: "rm unsourced or without associated articles; fill in some cites; rm one where violence was not involved". Pls let me know if there are any concerns. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, 2020 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply