Talk:Vicious (TV series)

Vicious (TV series) was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 11, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: British / Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Vicious (TV series)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BenLinus1214 (talk · contribs) 22:37, 10 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I will be reviewing this for GAN. Give me a couple hours to read this. BenLinus 1214^talk 22:37, 10 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately, I will have to fail this article for now. Basically, the problem is that the article is not very informative or broad enough. Extremely far from a GA in that regard, especially because there are no production notes whatsoever and the episode mostly consists of an episode list. BenLinus 1214^talk 01:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
There's not really much prose here, so you need to change that.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Your larger numbers of mixed to negative reviews is a bit troubling
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

@CB2288: If you would like to further improve the article, here are some comments:

The article does not have a wide enough scope. There are no production details, and the series overview and reception sections are much too short.
A lot of your references boil down to database entries, which shouldn't be over-cited in an article, as they do not illustrate notability.
Your page mostly consists of an episode list, which isn't really great for a GA. If you think about it, if you remove the episode list, the article is pretty much nothing. I'm not suggesting that you remove it--just pointing that out.

Lead
- This stuff doesn't have to be cited per WP:LEADCITE.
Series overview
- Needs expansion.
Cast and characters
- Unsourced.
- Should probably expand into prose. See Veronica Mars for example.
Episodes
- Your main ratings link is suffering from WP:Link rot.
Reception
- No source on Rotten Tomatoes
- Your reviews don't seem to cover an 80% positive review rate.
DVD Release
- Unsourced

Add topic