Talk:U.S. Route 7

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on U.S. Route 7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060921003043/http://www.aot.state.vt.us/Planning/Documents/TrafResearch/Publications/2004RouteLogAADTs.pdf to http://www.aot.state.vt.us/Planning/Documents/TrafResearch/Publications/2004RouteLogAADTs.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed merge with U.S. Route 7 in Connecticut

Per WP:USRD's informal "three state rule" if a highway goes through three (or fewer) states, any state-detail articles should probably be merged into the main highway article. From a maintenance standpoint, editors would only have to maintain one article. –Fredddie™ 16:14, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Due to Twinkle not being able to do it automatically, I have placed similar notices on U.S. Route 7 in Massachusetts and U.S. Route 7 in Vermont. –Fredddie™ 16:17, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

• Oppose for Connecticut. Route 7 in a Connecticut is a road of history. It starts up as an expressway from a major highway, combines for a bit with a major highway, and is the section of the route with the most activity/history. The other states I can see why not but Connecticut should stay its own article AmericanAir88 (talk) 18:50, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
• Support—all of the content of the three articles should fit without being unwieldy. I don't see a need to keep the CT section separate. Imzadi 1979 → 12:34, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
• Support–the RDs are essentially duplicates on this page and each state specific page. Needforspeed888 (talk) 13:15, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
• Oppose I don't see how merging this is necessaryKieran207 (talk) 13:39, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

  It's about maintenance. We currently have four articles about a route that's only 300 miles long. There is precedence with U.S. Route 44, Interstate 91, and Interstate 93. –Fredddie™ 22:41, 5 December 2020 (UTC)