This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This is what Wikisource is for. There is no reason to have it in two places.
The treaty text that was in the article was horrible. It didn't make sense, especially with everything a list. Not all bullet points are equal or should be one. A person's name treated as an item along with treaty text is not good. Bgwhite (talk) 04:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I am concerned about all the talk about Bernarda Ruiz and her part in the negotiations for the Treaty of Cahuenga. I have checked a number of primary sources and find her mentioned only once, in Fremont's Memoirs. He says he met her in Santa Barbara and had a fruitful talk with her, but all the rest (riding with him to LA, meeting with Andres Pico, witnessing the signing) I find highly questionable. If anyone has information on this, I would be grateful to hear it. Windsong0425 (talk) 17:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
