Talk:Tor Books

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Needs updating edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article has been tagged as needing updating since 2008. I will try to post specific suggestions for changes here. --Pleasantville (talk) 11:25, 4 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I think the long list of authors published by Tor is not particularly useful, and could be cut or eliminated. I would like to see more history of the evolution of the company, though the sourcing is going to be a bit difficult -- I imagine most of it could be found in old issues of Locus, but that would be quite a research project. Mike Christie (talk) 11:44, 4 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Editors? edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is the list of editors, which is unreferenced, appropriate for an encyclopedia article? RJFJR (talk) 00:55, 20 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I belive that this is an issue, as i did not find any other publishing companies pages that had an editors section. I belive it needs deletion. Deadeye312 (talk) 03:07, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic