Talk:Tombeau

Possible copyright violation?

It looks like this has been taken directly from http://www.polyhymnion.org/tombeau/ and I can find no indication that permission was given. Looks like a fairly clear case to me, but I don't know what standard procedure is around here.

Also note that the German article http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tombeau looks like a direct translation of this page and hence a copyright violation. So if a German speaker could look at that too...

-Insouciance 11:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Yepp, that was me. I firdt wrote the article in German, then translated it into English myself. --Mathiasroesel 11:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC) Hej, Mathias, The German Neusidler article needs your attention.Galassi 11:30, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

As the chief webmaster of Polyhymnion, I assure you there is no violation.Lute88 11:49, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh good. Moved to Wikipedia:Copyright_problems in the "Poster claims permission" section. I've no idea what happens from here, but since you're actively involved I hope it can be cleared up quickly -Insouciance 22:55, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

This now raises a new problem. Since it is word-for-word identical to the Polyhymnion article, is that item in turn a simple re-publication of this Wikipedia article (as is so commonly found around the web)? If so, it cannot be used as a reliable source, since it is merely citing itself.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 22:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Considering that it is written by a lutenist/scholar/theologian- Id call it more than reliable.Galassi (talk) 22:23, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I think the article on Polyhymnion appears to be admirable. The problem is simply that Wikipedia articles by design are anonymous and cannot be signed, and anyone is supposed to be able to edit them. Therefore no authority can inhere in the author(s).—Jerome Kohl (talk) 06:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Revisited

The entirety of the body of the article is enclosed in a series of quotes. It's good that those quotes are acknowledged, but it's not good that all we have is quotes and no original writing. -- ♬ Jack of Oz ♬ ^{[your turn]} 22:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Agreed, and don't you think it is more than just faintly ridiculous that an article consisting entirely of cited quotations is flagged with "This article needs additional citations for verification"?—Jerome Kohl (talk) 22:45, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Modern tombeaux

Is this page restricted to the original tombeaux, or should we also be mentioning the one everyone knows, Ravel's Tombeau de Couperin, and other modern ones like de Falla's Tombeau de Debussy and Arthur Benjamin's Tombeau de Ravel? -- ♬ Jack of Oz ♬ ^{[your turn]} 03:15, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Well worth the inclusion.--Galassi (talk) 03:30, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Tombeau For Michael Collins.ogg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)